|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
S Chassis Technical discussion related to the S Chassis such as the S12, S13, S14, and S15. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-26-2014, 03:08 AM | #31 | |
Quote:
Injectors are rated at 43.5psi ( common base fuel pressure ) What happens when you take a 370cc and crank up base fuel to 80psi? It becomes 501cc How many cc does it take to make 380bhp at 80psi? 442cc albeit static you fucking moron! Just fuckin give up already, Jesus Christ..you've proven 3 fucking times you don't know what the hell your talking about.
__________________
406hp/385tq- [email protected] Hatch(old) 599hp/454tq- [email protected]??? Coupe(new) |
||
Sponsored Links |
04-26-2014, 03:16 AM | #32 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay Area CA, Sutherlin OR
Age: 33
Posts: 3,289
Trader Rating: (3)
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
Lets use your calculator again(what the 4th time I have showed you your numbers are BULLCRAP). To get 366 crank HP at 43.5PSI you need 640cc injectors, so your 370cc injector turned up to 80psi(which it isn't you said STOCK FUEL PRESSURE) you get 501cc. So do the math, 640CC(at 43.5) needed minus 501cc(80) supplied equals 139cc missing... To get your 370s up to cover the missing ccs you would need to go another 50psi above your 80psi figure. So if you are using this calculator and getting only 442cc needed for 380hp you are forgetting to change from 6 injectors to 4 or some shit because it just doesn't work with 4cyl. Someone can't math but that is ok, not everyone can be smart. Your power numbers of 366 crank are still bullshit even by your numbers, try to prove me wrong all you want but even your math does not work with stock fuel pressure.
__________________
Quote:
Need to adjust your idle? http://zilvia.net/f/s-chassis/395413...-pictures.html |
|
04-26-2014, 03:29 AM | #33 | |
Quote:
Lol, didn't I say static? I did! What's that mean? Fully open! Go ahead and put this in: 100% duty, 80psi @ bsfc what do you get? 442! Now! This was an example to prove your top fuel garbage wrong. I was running stock fuel pressure on this car, as I fucking said! ( my old car also did 360ish with cranked fuel pressure. So I know from experience, not just calculators that it works. ) I have 0 explanation for it myself. unless I have remand injectors that were on it when I bought the engine swap, but the car ran near perfect afrs with an injection multiplier calculated for z32 maf and 370cc injectors. I'm not claiming some magic formula, just sharing my results from the information I have. Including dyno sheet...
__________________
406hp/385tq- [email protected] Hatch(old) 599hp/454tq- [email protected]??? Coupe(new) Last edited by kovert240sx; 04-26-2014 at 03:36 AM.. Reason: Why do I get the feeling all this is going over your head, and you have to consult google before responding? |
||
04-26-2014, 03:39 AM | #34 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay Area CA, Sutherlin OR
Age: 33
Posts: 3,289
Trader Rating: (3)
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
You never said 100% duty cycle, that makes sense, my numbers are just as correct as yours and leave that margin of safety. IDK why I did not consider you were not running them far beyond that safety, probably because its 3am. I never said your system was running top fuel dragster pressures, and I even came back and admitted that was wrong when I remembered that one calculator was horse shit. Also quit your talking about the dyno sheet and post it already, but that dyno sheet could be from anything so again with how little sense your Unicorn SR20 makes I am inclined to not believe it.
Either you have no clue what is really on or in your engine or you are making stuff up to cover up being called out on 370cc injectors, stock fuel pressure, and such and such turbo.
__________________
Quote:
Need to adjust your idle? http://zilvia.net/f/s-chassis/395413...-pictures.html |
|
04-26-2014, 03:49 AM | #35 | |
Quote:
Sorry I didn't put it into basic terms for you. I obviously posted this in the wrong place when a thread on how to install a key ring light is one of the most viewed posts. No clue what the turbo was? I'll give you that.. I bought it as a 2510, but even I'll admit... I was in doubt after the dyno. No clue I was running 9.5:1? Yup, also admitted. Trying to get Internet points for false claims? No... Just sharing results from the information I had. Fuck me for sharing.
__________________
406hp/385tq- [email protected] Hatch(old) 599hp/454tq- [email protected]??? Coupe(new) |
||
04-26-2014, 08:42 AM | #36 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Denver
Age: 37
Posts: 2,052
Trader Rating: (14)
Feedback Score: 14 reviews
|
Seems to be a little foggy math on both sides, OP how sure are you that your motor came with stock 370s? I mean, could they have been upgraded in the mother land to 440 or 550s?
Also, OP, why do you think that this hasn't been posted before somewhere else; FWD sr's are running similar ratios, turbos and injections and have come no where close to this? Could it be the tune (which I may have missed you posting), the turbo or the dyno? Buddy of mine ran 550s, GTiR t28 (I believe 15psi), factory FPR, walboro and emanage an put down 280 ish... On a JDM SR20DE(T) which has the same comp ratio. Granted this was at altitude too, but I believe the dyno may have been compensating for that too... I am more curious than any thing, no offense, but I just want some information for the future of my SR. THANKS.
__________________
S13 Vert | SR | PE1420 | 5-Speed | 15x9.5 - 0 | |
04-26-2014, 08:30 PM | #38 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,701
Trader Rating: (16)
Feedback Score: 16 reviews
|
This shit stain is fucking hopeless.
You need more like 520-540 cc injectors running at 100% duty cycle (that still isn't technically static due to the lag time). You didn't get that out of a drop in pump and 370s. You didn't make 360+ on a GT2510. You'd need at least a GT2530. MAXIMUM theoretical thermodynamic efficiency gains going from 8.5 to 9.5:1 is on the order of 2.5-3%. Realistically on pump gas at this power level it's probably more like 1% max. Even on E85 you don't get the thermodynamic maximum gain due to extra pumping losses, more ring blow by etc. And before you get all uppity OP, keep in mind I've forgotten more about cars than you'll ever know.
__________________
S13 Hatch - Goes around tracks quickly DEFSPORT |
04-26-2014, 09:10 PM | #39 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: SoCal (I.E.), San Berdino, Colton, Redlands
Posts: 1,665
Trader Rating: (17)
Feedback Score: 17 reviews
|
OK this thread bashing has gone far enough now.
OP you brought this on to your self, but just leave this as is. The more you post the worse you make it for your self. This thread should be locked ASAP. |
04-30-2014, 08:13 AM | #40 | |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 2,263
Trader Rating: (43)
Feedback Score: 43 reviews
|
Quote:
Yeah, every SR20DE has OEM 9.5:1 CR pistons which is just the same thing as your SR20DET block with OEM DE pistons. Good job! |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|