|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-27-2018, 11:34 PM | #1 |
Post Whore!
|
The Official Garrett G25 Turbo Talk (550/660)
I am not sure if you guys are aware but it appears Garrett released a new line of turbos in a T28 housing. It appears these turbos are meant for 1.4-3.0 liter engines and can produce 550/660 horsepower. Maybe this might be a replacement for the gt2871r and want to know what you guys think. Like how they come with a v-band setup but it appears, these turbos are simply made for top mount manifolds. Has anyone here have or plan to purchase this turbo for their build?
G25-550: https://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbo...series-g25-550 G25-660: https://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbo...series-g25-660
__________________
|
Sponsored Links |
06-27-2018, 11:45 PM | #2 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 38
Posts: 4,649
Trader Rating: (17)
Feedback Score: 17 reviews
|
I remember back when they released the 'amazing' gt25r or whatever that supported 350bhp. now like ten years later its double?! I think that is a good benchmark for where we have gone from.
wow https://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbo...?itok=lfA7K_bA This one on a 2.0 looks pretty amazing. 07psi would take you to 300rwhp 15psi ""390rwhp 21psi ""430rwhp close to max output A good street setup with a little N2O fogger and E85 or methanol would put that 2.0 over 500whp on most dyno |
06-28-2018, 12:08 AM | #3 |
Post Whore!
|
yea, their new line up is pretty nuts. Small form-factor turbos that produce high hp. My concern is because I saw the videos from Adam LZ and Monky London, and it caught my interest.
Adam LZ (G25-550): Monky London (G25-660):
__________________
|
06-28-2018, 01:58 AM | #4 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: France - Toulouse
Age: 41
Posts: 1,851
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I have been waiting for feedback on these for quite some time now. Thing is, between pricing and lack of availability, it looks like not many people buy them.
And i do not feel like being a guinea pig for that kind of money. So... still waiting. i'd go with a g25 550 on a 1.8L engine, target is around 450whp with some room on e85 with headwork, solid lifters and cams among other things. I'd like to go bottom mount though. |
06-28-2018, 10:05 AM | #5 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago
Age: 35
Posts: 6,296
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I am curious about these. I have been more than happy with my GTX2863, coming from a GT2871. I can't imagine what this feels like.
__________________
PROCEED Grip Gambler |
06-28-2018, 03:26 PM | #6 |
Nissanaholic!
|
this is a great idea...im curious as the super charger guys found out that they are good til a point then they make no power I was told the speed of sound as it sucks no more air...but will be good to find out if this is legit!
|
06-28-2018, 07:24 PM | #7 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: torrance, ca
Age: 39
Posts: 12,407
Trader Rating: (129)
Feedback Score: 129 reviews
|
they should let me beta test the larger one. if I can get 500whp on 91 octane, at 18psi, I'd be a happy camper. Hopefully they'll release more info and pricing soon
|
06-28-2018, 11:23 PM | #8 |
Post Whore!
|
I can't wait for updates from either youtubers until they tune their cars. I am wondering if this would be a nice replacement for a stock sr20det with slight mods (retune, z32, and 740cc).
__________________
|
06-29-2018, 01:13 AM | #9 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 38
Posts: 4,649
Trader Rating: (17)
Feedback Score: 17 reviews
|
Quote:
It doesn't really matter how much boost once the turbo has enough capacity. It matters how much RPM you spin the engine. For example say you limited rpm to 6000. Well no matter how much "bigger and better" the turbo gets, even the best turbo in the world at 18psi is not going to touch 500whp with a 2.0L engine. Ex math, 122x6000/3456 = 211CFM * 0.069 = 14.6lb/min * (2.22) = 320 horsepower without drivetrain losses. So now lets take a 2.0L engine at 7psi with a "very efficient turbo" except this time we spin the engine to 9,800rpm 122x9800/3456 = 345.9 * .069 = 23.87lb/min * 1.5 = 358bhp So less boost, more power, because more rpm. but you knew that. |
|
06-29-2018, 01:30 AM | #11 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: torrance, ca
Age: 39
Posts: 12,407
Trader Rating: (129)
Feedback Score: 129 reviews
|
Very true! But thank you for taking the time to demonstrate WHY it works out this way!
|
06-29-2018, 08:13 AM | #12 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 2,254
Trader Rating: (3)
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
I'd love to see one perform on a pump gas KA.
Wish E85 was more available in my area, cause I'd turn my 3076 to the fuckin moon However, these are a seriously fucking stout turbo for a T2 frame. |
06-29-2018, 09:57 AM | #13 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: torrance, ca
Age: 39
Posts: 12,407
Trader Rating: (129)
Feedback Score: 129 reviews
|
yeah, def with the added displacement of a KA over an SR, the torque curve with the 660 would be fatty!
|
06-29-2018, 12:48 PM | #15 | |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 2,254
Trader Rating: (3)
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
Quote:
Most people upgrade before maxing a turbo out, anyways. 450 on a T2 framed turbo is stout. The fact that 500+ is even possible speaks volumes. When most people think of 500HP they think of something like a 3076. Companies releasing a smaller turbo that is more efficient is the coolest thing. |
|
Bookmarks |
Tags |
550, 660, g25, garrett, turbo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|