Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

Go Back   Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum > General > Tech Talk

Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2014, 12:22 AM   #1
Shimadorisanni
Zilvia Junkie
 
Shimadorisanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 405
Trader Rating: (8)
Shimadorisanni is making a name for him/her selfShimadorisanni is making a name for him/her self
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
Preload/Suspension/Ride Height Questions

As of now I currently am riding on GP Sport Gmaster coils 10kg/8kg, and am currently maxed out on the rear using the bottom spinning mount. I need to know a way to lower the ride height a bit more while still maintaining similar preload rates. Would Swift Assist springs achieve this? Would it allow me to retain the preload? Or would they actually soften the spring? The other option is a helper spring, which I feel like accomplish the same thing. Also what helper/assist spring rate would be ideal? Any help would be appreciated.

Helper Spring
http://www.frsport.com/Swift-H65-060...m_p_62300.html

Assist Spring
http://www.frsport.com/Swift-A65-068...h_p_13984.html
Shimadorisanni is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 12-04-2014, 10:18 AM   #2
derass
Zilvia FREAK!
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Age: 33
Posts: 1,182
Trader Rating: (0)
derass is making a name for him/her selfderass is making a name for him/her self
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Depends on how much thread distance you have between the lower mount and the spring perch. Those helpers are going to add a few inches to the total spring length. If its too long, you would have to actually raise the car to install the helpers. That wont help you achieve what you're trying to do.

You didn't mention what chassis your car is, but I know S14 have very long rear shock bodies, so there may be enough room for your idea to work.

Either of your options will preload the new spring combination, the assist spring more-so than the helper. The assist spring has stiffer rates and is intended to offer a progressive rate when installed on a coilover with an existing linear rate spring. The helper spring has a very low spring rate and is intended only to prevent the spring combination from becoming loose at full droop, with the weight of the car on them, they will be fully compressed.

Installing helper springs would not affect the overall spring rate. Assist springs, in a sense would soften the spring. This is because the progressive rate ideology behind their use. However, once they are fully compressed (cornering, taking a bump etc.) the spring combination will take on the rate of the original linear spring.

With that being said, I personally would choose to get the assist springs. They would preload the entire spring combination while giving the coilovers progressive rates, making them ride much more smoothly. I would probably get the 5kg/mm rate as I have 6kg/mm currently and find them to be a bit stiff.

Another option would be drop knuckles in the rear.
derass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2014, 11:58 AM   #3
Shimadorisanni
Zilvia Junkie
 
Shimadorisanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 405
Trader Rating: (8)
Shimadorisanni is making a name for him/her selfShimadorisanni is making a name for him/her self
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by derass View Post
Depends on how much thread distance you have between the lower mount and the spring perch. Those helpers are going to add a few inches to the total spring length. If its too long, you would have to actually raise the car to install the helpers. That wont help you achieve what you're trying to do.

You didn't mention what chassis your car is, but I know S14 have very long rear shock bodies, so there may be enough room for your idea to work.

Either of your options will preload the new spring combination, the assist spring more-so than the helper. The assist spring has stiffer rates and is intended to offer a progressive rate when installed on a coilover with an existing linear rate spring. The helper spring has a very low spring rate and is intended only to prevent the spring combination from becoming loose at full droop, with the weight of the car on them, they will be fully compressed.

Installing helper springs would not affect the overall spring rate. Assist springs, in a sense would soften the spring. This is because the progressive rate ideology behind their use. However, once they are fully compressed (cornering, taking a bump etc.) the spring combination will take on the rate of the original linear spring.

With that being said, I personally would choose to get the assist springs. They would preload the entire spring combination while giving the coilovers progressive rates, making them ride much more smoothly. I would probably get the 5kg/mm rate as I have 6kg/mm currently and find them to be a bit stiff.

Another option would be drop knuckles in the rear.

Sorry, i will take some pictures today of the tread distance as well as the measurement from top of spring to perch. The chassis is an s13, and soon I will be adding subframe risers which i hope will give me a little more leeway. So for an 8kg/mm rear spring I would want a 5kg/mm assist spring setup?
Shimadorisanni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2014, 12:13 PM   #4
TheRealSy90
Premium Member
 
TheRealSy90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Age: 30
Posts: 7,679
Trader Rating: (10)
TheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant future
Feedback Score: 10 reviews
Adding any sort of additional spring is going to raise your ride height with your current setup.

You could get shorter swift springs to replace your current springs, however, I also have GP Sports coilovers and with the rear mounts fully raised, lock collars removed, and the spring perch drooped all the way to the bottom mount, i'm tucking rim on 17's... So I don't see the need for shorter springs.

Remove your lock collars and droop the rear spring to the lower mount, or as far as you need to go lower.

I'm planning on not drooping the spring in the future, and instead raising the top mounting point higher up inside the car, thus lowering the car. Also, subframe risers will not affect your ride height.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by crimsonrockett View Post
Such a good signature.
TheRealSy90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 09:58 AM   #5
derass
Zilvia FREAK!
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, ON
Age: 33
Posts: 1,182
Trader Rating: (0)
derass is making a name for him/her selfderass is making a name for him/her self
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I think Sy has the better idea of what you could do. Shorter springs will lower the car further and allow you to retain preload. If you want to have a very low ride height with the frame an inch from the ground and the wheel/tire right against the fender, a softer rate that would result after installing assist springs probably isn't the best idea. Those assist springs will have at least an inch of travel before they fully compress and you would bottom out on the road or your fenders.
derass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 10:25 AM   #6
Shimadorisanni
Zilvia Junkie
 
Shimadorisanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 405
Trader Rating: (8)
Shimadorisanni is making a name for him/her selfShimadorisanni is making a name for him/her self
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealSy90 View Post
Adding any sort of additional spring is going to raise your ride height with your current setup.

You could get shorter swift springs to replace your current springs, however, I also have GP Sports coilovers and with the rear mounts fully raised, lock collars removed, and the spring perch drooped all the way to the bottom mount, i'm tucking rim on 17's... So I don't see the need for shorter springs.

Remove your lock collars and droop the rear spring to the lower mount, or as far as you need to go lower.

I'm planning on not drooping the spring in the future, and instead raising the top mounting point higher up inside the car, thus lowering the car. Also, subframe risers will not affect your ride height.

I was going to do that but i was worried as to the effect that it would have after doing that, wouldn't the drooping spring cause some preload problems? I dont need to be frame rails on ground low, as I have BN, but would like to get more wheel under my fender if at all possible.

I thought subframe risers raise the subframe a few cm, allowing the bottom mounting point to be closer (in theory) to the top of the strut tower (coilover mounting point)?

Regardless, thanks for the advice. I will put this to good use. Definitely have thrown assist/helper springs out of the equation.
Shimadorisanni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 10:27 AM   #7
Shimadorisanni
Zilvia Junkie
 
Shimadorisanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 405
Trader Rating: (8)
Shimadorisanni is making a name for him/her selfShimadorisanni is making a name for him/her self
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by derass View Post
I think Sy has the better idea of what you could do. Shorter springs will lower the car further and allow you to retain preload. If you want to have a very low ride height with the frame an inch from the ground and the wheel/tire right against the fender, a softer rate that would result after installing assist springs probably isn't the best idea. Those assist springs will have at least an inch of travel before they fully compress and you would bottom out on the road or your fenders.

I agree, i would rather retain the same spring rate, while just sacrificing a bit of preload, rather than having more rear travel due to lower rate. Thanks for the help. Ill see what removing the bottom lock collars feel like.
Shimadorisanni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 12:25 PM   #8
TheRealSy90
Premium Member
 
TheRealSy90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Age: 30
Posts: 7,679
Trader Rating: (10)
TheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant future
Feedback Score: 10 reviews
Drooping the spring essentially would be no pre load on the spring. Also, rising the subframe is only rising up the inside mount points of the suspension arms, it is not raising the knuckle up towards the car, thus not lowering ride height.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by crimsonrockett View Post
Such a good signature.
TheRealSy90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 02:17 PM   #9
!Zar!
Premium Member
 
!Zar!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 14,576
Trader Rating: (27)
!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection!Zar! is close to perfection
Feedback Score: 27 reviews
Drooping the spring and putting a shorter spring on the car is the same thing.

Whoever says otherwise is an idiot.
__________________
!Zar! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 03:03 PM   #10
Shimadorisanni
Zilvia Junkie
 
Shimadorisanni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 405
Trader Rating: (8)
Shimadorisanni is making a name for him/her selfShimadorisanni is making a name for him/her self
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
How much revalving would be needed for a shorter spring?
Shimadorisanni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2014, 10:02 PM   #11
TheRealSy90
Premium Member
 
TheRealSy90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Age: 30
Posts: 7,679
Trader Rating: (10)
TheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant future
Feedback Score: 10 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Zar! View Post
Drooping the spring and putting a shorter spring on the car is the same thing.

Whoever says otherwise is an idiot.
You can retain preload with the shorter spring, but then again that wouldn't lower the car at all lol.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by crimsonrockett View Post
Such a good signature.
TheRealSy90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
s13, suspension


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright © 1998 - 2019, Zilvia.net™