|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
LOUD NOISES A place for political mudslinging, Pro/Anti legalization, gay marriage debate, Gun control rants, etc. If it's political, controversial, or hotly debated, it goes here. No regular Off-Topic stuff allowed. READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-27-2010, 11:30 PM | #1 |
Philosopher King
|
Natural Disaster Conspiracy
This is a place to let it all hang out. If you have a disaster some one has a perp.
Lets here 'em. Bonus points for theories that directly oppose\conflict each other.
__________________
G O L D E N B E A R R E P U B L I C |
Sponsored Links |
02-28-2010, 03:06 AM | #2 |
Zilvia Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 35
Posts: 500
Trader Rating: (-1)
Feedback Score: -1 reviews
|
Apparently... the Scientologists' are on top of this HARRRRPPP SHIT. Had to go on a field trip while I was in med school about 2 years ago in sunset here in LA. It's one of their museums called the museum of death. It's mainly on the truth about psych meds which is pretty crazy, I think everyone should go here just to check it out. At the end it randomly has an exhibition on all the crazy newer gov. shit and haarp was one of them ahahaha
oh btw it's free. Plus it's not Directly a Scientology recruitment place. Got scared for a min didn't want to go in and end up like Tom ahahahaha it has nothing to do with it but i think it's owned by them. |
02-28-2010, 10:09 AM | #3 |
Philosopher King
|
I love one group says that Russia has had weather control and is fucking us up with it, the only reason we are ok is because Israel has it to and they stand up for us.
The other group says WE have weather control and the government is using on every one. Now they say this weather control technology is causing the earth quakes. I have to ask, which one is it? You can't keep both theories.
__________________
G O L D E N B E A R R E P U B L I C |
02-28-2010, 11:04 AM | #5 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montgomery County, MD
Age: 33
Posts: 3,197
Trader Rating: (1)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Weather dominator!
Also HAARP causes mackerel clouds. They are not natural weather phenomena. HAARP is doing it from the other side of the planet.
__________________
|
04-21-2010, 10:32 PM | #9 |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Laguna Niguel (O.C.)
Posts: 1,301
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Check out the documentary "holes is heaven H.A.A.R.P". It'll explain everything.. I hate govt.
They themselves say they can manipulate the weather and even the minds of people (to a degree).. Scarey/annoying at the same time.. They are willing to develop this technology at the expense of lives and the planet. Again, they themselves say they don't know how far they can push the envelope this before they cause irreversible damage to the earth. |
11-10-2010, 02:32 PM | #13 |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NOLA
Age: 40
Posts: 1,509
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
My friend, today, told me that he spent six years in Alaska. I asked him if he knew about nome (sp?) He said no, but I kno w about HARP. I was like what's that. then he told me the jist of it and how Katrina might have been a result of them F$%^king with the weather... hmmm i must look into this
__________________
R.I.P. KAIN. YOU'LL ALWAYS BE BY MY SIDE! 240 addict miata addict |
11-30-2010, 10:03 AM | #14 |
BANNED
|
You guys remember the hottest day in LA ever a few months ago...? 113 degress in Downtown Los Angeles.
I think the General in charge of the weather machine was f**king up. He/she failed to properly adjust the flow of warm air from the gulf to counter the cold mass sent east from Asia. Radar shots of that day show a warm current coming from the south and curving westward in Baja California then hangs a right around Washington state. That warm current from the gulf never runs west of the Rockies. This time it went waaaaay west of the Rockies. It was used to counter a cold front sent our way. If the cold front would have crossed over the Rockies and collided with the warm front over "Tornado Ally", it would have been a disaster! Weather control was established as possible in the 1950's! |
12-01-2010, 05:56 PM | #15 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Southern California
Age: 36
Posts: 4,266
Trader Rating: (5)
Feedback Score: 5 reviews
|
fuck yeah...haarp. I watched those videos too....
if it's possible....we put military in haiti....when they didn't want military. one of south america's presidents was talking shit....we sent them a message. Mexico started talking shit...hit them with an earthquake too... who wants some? lol. but no really....major disasters bring people together...get ready for 2012. lol |
12-09-2010, 01:47 AM | #19 |
BANNED
|
From the 1950's I think.
http://graphicsworkshop.net/blog/Ima...er_control.jpg Imagine what may be possible today... |
12-15-2010, 12:57 PM | #21 | |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NOLA
Age: 40
Posts: 1,509
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. KAIN. YOU'LL ALWAYS BE BY MY SIDE! 240 addict miata addict |
|
04-14-2011, 01:30 AM | #23 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 138
Trader Rating: (8)
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
|
The greatest challenge to a Nations ability to conduct war is opposition from the its citizens.
Vietnam ended because of protest in America. Nuclear weapons were not used in Korea becuse the American people would not have stood by and let it happen. World War 3 started in early 2001. War has been conducted in a fashion that the world has not learned to recognise as war. This has allowed war to be conducted with minimal protest from "The People" These are inserts from the book written by two Chinese Col. in regards to defeating America. Notice how it will not speak of dropping bombs from the sky but rather using International law to defeat an enemy. I hope this sparks a positive and spirited debate! UNRESTRICTED WARFARE The English translation of the book was made available by the Foreign Broadcast Information Service on the internet in 1999. Reportedly, the United States Naval Academy wrote to the authors to ask for permission in using this book as their ...official textbook.[citation needed] The book was then published in English by a previously unknown Panamanian publisher, with the subtitle "China's Master Plan to Destroy America" and a picture of the burning World Trade Center on the cover. These additions were thought to be misinterpretations of the text, not intended by the original authors. A French translation was published in 2003. The text has been cited by the U.S. government, e.g. on a military website by James Perry who states: In February 1999, the PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House issued Unrestricted Warfare, a book written by two PLA air force political officers, Senior Col Qiao Liang and Senior Col Wang Xiangsui. The venue for publication and the laudatory reviews of the book in official publications suggested that Unrestricted Warfare enjoyed the support of some elements of the PLA leadership. The Western press quoted various sensational passages from the book and described it in terms that verged on hyperbole. The book was not a blueprint for a “dirty war” against the West but a call for innovative thinking on future warfare. [edit] Weaknesses of the United States The book argues that the primary weakness of the United States in military matters is that the US views revolution in military thought solely in terms of technology. The book further argues that to the US, military doctrine evolves because new technology allows new capabilities. As such, the book argues that the United States does not consider the wider picture of military strategy, which includes legal and economic factors. The book proceeds to argue that the United States is vulnerable to attack along these lines. [edit] Alternative methods of attack Reducing one's opponent, the book notes, can be accomplished in a number of ways other than direct military confrontation. The book notes that these alternative methods "have the same and even greater destructive force than military warfare, and they have already produced serious threats different from the past and in many directions for...national security." [edit] Lawfare Lawfare, or political action through transnational or non-governmental organisations can effect a policy change that would be impossible otherwise. Because of the international nature of the modern world and activism, it is much easier for nation-states to affect policy in other nation-states through a proxy. [edit] Economic warfare Owing to the interconnected nature of global economics, nations can inflict grievous harm on the economies of other nations without taking any offensive action. [edit] Network warfare see iWar One of the better-known alternatives in this book is the idea of attacking networks. Networks are increasingly important in not only data exchange but also transportation, financial institutions, and communication. Attacks that disable networks can easily hamstring large areas of life that are dependent on them for coordination. One example of network warfare would be shutting down a network that supplies power. If there is a significant failure in the power grid caused by the attack, massive power outages could result, crippling industry, defence, medicine, and all other areas of life. [edit] Terrorism Another famous instance of Unrestricted Warfare policy is terrorism. Terrorism is used by a group to gain satisfaction for certain demands. Even if these demands are not satisfied, a terrorist attack can have vastly disproportionate effects on national welfare. One only has to look at the economic crisis that followed the terrorist attacks against the United States, or the extensive security measures put in place after those same attacks. Terrorism erodes a nation's sense of security and well being, even if the direct effects of the attacks only concern a minute percentage of the population. [edit] Defence against unrestricted warfare The authors note that an old-fashioned mentality that considers military action the only offensive action is inadequate given the new range of threats. Instead, the authors advocate forming a "composite force in all aspects related to national interest. Moreover, given this type of composite force, it is also necessary to have this type of composite force to become the means which can be utilized for actual operations. This should be a "grand warfare method" which combines all of the dimensions and methods in the two major areas of military and non-military affairs so as to carry out warfare. This is opposite of the formula for warfare methods brought forth in past wars." [edit] Implications As the authors state, the new range of options combined with the rising cost (both political and financial) of waging traditional warfare results in the rising dominance of the new alternatives to traditional military action. A state that does not heed these warnings is in dire shape. WANT TO DOWNLOAD THE WHOLE BOOK? HERE IS THE LINK!!! http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...=rep1&type=pdf |
04-14-2011, 01:29 PM | #26 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Alberta, Red Derp
Age: 40
Posts: 1,729
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
So if you are right about everything you say.... and I've 'seen the light'. Now what? go over the internet and talk to a whole bunch more people, take arms, what? Show me the way o master.
__________________
KA-T ORG-Function over Flush |
04-15-2011, 01:04 AM | #28 | |
Zilvia Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North San Diego County
Posts: 163
Trader Rating: (6)
Feedback Score: 6 reviews
|
Quote:
both are going on as we speak. we have dozens of haarp facilities all over the globe that we can use to create/ affect weather as well as create tectonic disturbances. The russians have a more advanced SCALAR weapons system, which Israel also has- and who, at the moment, are standing between Russia and we fine folks. |
|
04-15-2011, 12:31 PM | #29 |
Philosopher King
|
No. Just no.
You Can Not have it both ways. Scalars are an entire different subject. Is it radio waves from haarp or scalars from who the fuck knows where. That one man has pulled the wool over America's eyes for decades by using a real thing(scalar) and completely twisting it into something else. It's the scientology of physics. Go read up on REAL physics having to do with scalars. No one is trying to hide anything. If that much potential energy was really there the world would already be using it.
__________________
G O L D E N B E A R R E P U B L I C |
04-17-2011, 03:54 PM | #30 | ||
Leaky Injector
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 138
Trader Rating: (8)
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|