Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

Go Back   Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum > General > Tech Talk > Engine Tech

Engine Tech Technical discussion related to all relevant engines such as KA, SR, RB, CA, 2JZ , L24/26/28, VG, VQ, and LSx series.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-03-2016, 03:41 PM   #31
cotbu
Post Whore!
 
cotbu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SWFL
Age: 47
Posts: 3,318
Trader Rating: (3)
cotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nicecotbu is just really nice
Feedback Score: 3 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by RB25GUY View Post
I beg to differ recirc setups on high hp SR will only help the turbo spool faster and still makes animalstics noises and cold side will always be the correct side imo
__________________

LoverTechnologies "Half Broken Things!"
cotbu is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 11-03-2016, 04:30 PM   #32
RB25GUY
Nissanaholic!
 
RB25GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NY
Age: 32
Posts: 2,013
Trader Rating: (9)
RB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the rough
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAT-PWR View Post
How can venting small amounts of pressure to atmosphere (intake) help the turbo spool faster? That pressure is immediately lost in the intake tube
It's not small amounts of pressure at 28 psi, its the same effect you get with no bov, all for faster throttle response which helps spool faster .... think about it...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellslikecurry View Post
Its not like you're putting a safc in a fucking Tesla.
RB25GUY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 04:51 PM   #33
KAT-PWR
Nissanaholic!
 
KAT-PWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: US
Posts: 2,040
Trader Rating: (11)
KAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really nice
Feedback Score: 11 reviews
No. the pressure is still being released. Sure there may be some residual pressure that assists by the valve not being large enough to vent all the pressure (pressure staying it pipes). But to say releasing that pressure in front of the turbo into open air makes no sense.
p1v1=p2v2


When air is vented to a non contained space (intake pipe) you're increasing the volume to infinity, as such pressure decreases accordingly to 0

Say you have 28psi (psi1) and a total pipe volume of 10m^3 (v1) you are venting this to the intake which as we know is open to atmosphere (there are other factors but let's not over complicate it) well say you use 100.000m^3
[(28psi)(10m^3)]/(100000m^3) = .0028psi into the intake preturbo aka nothing

You are correct that by keeping pressure up in the pipes full boost will be achieved quicker
__________________
MRP Manufacturing
KAT-PWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 04:55 PM   #34
justinbyrant
Zilvia Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: eugene
Age: 29
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: (0)
justinbyrant is an unknown quantity at this point
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAT-PWR View Post
No. the pressure is still being released. Sure there may be some residual pressure that marginally assists by the valve not being large enough to vent all the pressure (pressure staying it pipes). But to say releasing that pressure in front of the turbo into open air makes none.
I think the thought is if you release that air pointed into the turbo at fairly close range, the hope is it will blow through the fins and keep them spinning a bit, seems like hopeful thinking to me but who knows, personally I think running a tighter bov which would ideally maintain a small amount of pressure in the pipes would give better throttle response than anything else, it takes a lot less work to fill 5 feet of 3 inch pipe to 15 psi from 3 psi rather than from -15 psi
justinbyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 05:19 PM   #35
KAT-PWR
Nissanaholic!
 
KAT-PWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: US
Posts: 2,040
Trader Rating: (11)
KAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really nice
Feedback Score: 11 reviews
Yes residual pressure will help. I'm not arguing against that. But venting pressure preturbo will not help.
__________________
MRP Manufacturing
KAT-PWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 05:24 PM   #36
justinbyrant
Zilvia Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: eugene
Age: 29
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: (0)
justinbyrant is an unknown quantity at this point
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAT-PWR View Post
Yes residual pressure will help. I'm not arguing against that. But venting pressure preturbo will not help.
its not about pressure though its about flow, sure atmospheric pressure is 14.7 psi and a air compressor can run 200+ psi, and if you open that anywhere outside it doesn't increase the outside pressure, we all know this I don't think anyone is disputing it however if you now narrow the nozzle and point it at a fan when you vent the 200 psi out of the tank even if you narrow it down to a 28 psi tube and release it that way its still going to turn those fan blades (provided good bearings, close range, etc etc etc) I agree it wont generate any pressure however if its enough to keep the speed of the turbine up even a little then its still going to provide a miniscule advantage over venting to the atmosphere
justinbyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 05:26 PM   #37
KAT-PWR
Nissanaholic!
 
KAT-PWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: US
Posts: 2,040
Trader Rating: (11)
KAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really nice
Feedback Score: 11 reviews
After the air spends a long time losing velocity across the cross over tube. Seems trivial
__________________
MRP Manufacturing
KAT-PWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 05:27 PM   #38
justinbyrant
Zilvia Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: eugene
Age: 29
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: (0)
justinbyrant is an unknown quantity at this point
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
plus the intake is still going to be creating a draw its not exactly a 100% non contained space, if that was the case that air would blow out past the maf backwards and cause all kinds of messed up readings defeating the whole purpose of recirculating

I kind of think of it like piloting a boat down a river instead of across a flat lake or riding a bike in no wind or with the wind, its helpful
justinbyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 05:29 PM   #39
justinbyrant
Zilvia Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: eugene
Age: 29
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: (0)
justinbyrant is an unknown quantity at this point
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAT-PWR View Post
After the air spends a long time losing velocity across the cross over tube. Seems trivial
that's why using a smaller crossover tube would be more beneficial, same pressure flowing through a smaller diameter is going to create more velocity, at the same time a smaller tube will create a bottle neck slowing the speed of air escaping the charge pipes thus leaving behind a residual pressure once the valve closes, win/win
justinbyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2016, 06:18 PM   #40
KAT-PWR
Nissanaholic!
 
KAT-PWR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: US
Posts: 2,040
Trader Rating: (11)
KAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really niceKAT-PWR is just really nice
Feedback Score: 11 reviews
Only information I could find was import tuner where they didn't release the data on a seemingly factory 2008 lancer ralliart. 2% change in throttle response on a factory engineered car recirculated. Without having the hard data it's hard to determine its statistical significance. And any deviation from factory (increasing intake diameter, changing bov crossover diameter, length etc.) no real way to tell without data-logs if there is any real change
__________________
MRP Manufacturing
KAT-PWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 12:26 AM   #41
TheRealSy90
Premium Member
 
TheRealSy90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Age: 30
Posts: 7,679
Trader Rating: (10)
TheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant futureTheRealSy90 has a brilliant future
Feedback Score: 10 reviews
SR20 BOV Location

Well, looks like we need someone with a turbo that has a shaft speed sensor to do some logs. Shaft speed between shifts when recirc, vented, and even no bov/blocked bov. And then hot/cold side for all variants lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by crimsonrockett View Post
Such a good signature.
TheRealSy90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 12:03 PM   #42
justinbyrant
Zilvia Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: eugene
Age: 29
Posts: 229
Trader Rating: (0)
justinbyrant is an unknown quantity at this point
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
I would actually be very interested in seeing that lol
justinbyrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2016, 12:19 PM   #43
RB25GUY
Nissanaholic!
 
RB25GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NY
Age: 32
Posts: 2,013
Trader Rating: (9)
RB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the roughRB25GUY is a jewel in the rough
Feedback Score: 9 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAT-PWR View Post
Only information I could find was import tuner where they didn't release the data on a seemingly factory 2008 lancer ralliart. 2% change in throttle response on a factory engineered car recirculated. Without having the hard data it's hard to determine its statistical significance. And any deviation from factory (increasing intake diameter, changing bov crossover diameter, length etc.) no real way to tell without data-logs if there is any real change
http://www.speedhunters.com/2014/09/...rol-questions/




In a recirculating application this means the return path for compressed air returning to the intake is very direct, which enhances response. However, the air has not passed through the intercooler, so it can also be very hot (up to 100 degrees centigrade hotter than ambient air), introducing extra heat into the turbocharger system. The idea behind mounting the blow-off valve before the throttle body is that the airflow through the intake system continues to flow towards the intake manifold when the throttle is shut and the blow-off valve is venting, but when the throttle is reopened, air is still travelling in the same direction requiring less energy and time for the turbocharger to return to operating speeds. In a recirculating application the return path from the valve to the intake is much longer, however the recirculated air will be much cooler (only up to 50 degrees centigrade hotter than ambient air), thus not adding as much heat into the turbocharger system.

in theory you are right, in the real world its totally different ball game that ralliart they ran test on the CFMs on that baby (turboTD04HL-15T) is pushing compared to the TD06-25G no where near to compare



Ralliart TD04 on a 7 cm (.49 ar) 428 CFM, TD06H-25G is 850 cfm with a 10cm housing roughly (.71 ar) that 2 percent means nothing when the turbine flow difference is 100 plus percent more efficient than the TD04 they used in the "testing"......
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by smellslikecurry View Post
Its not like you're putting a safc in a fucking Tesla.
RB25GUY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2016, 06:26 PM   #44
Kingtal0n
Post Whore!
 
Kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 38
Posts: 4,649
Trader Rating: (17)
Kingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond repute
Feedback Score: 17 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Kingtal0n
bypass valve needs to be as close to the compressor as possible, with as short a tube as possible. Some new turbos are coming with them integrated to the compressor housing.

I made mine from scrap aluminum pipe and some shit I found on the floor of a friends shop

you can do it
Kingtal0n is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright © 1998 - 2019, Zilvia.net™