|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Motorsports and Skilled Driving Discussion for Organized Racing and motorsports and tips and techniques at becoming a better driver. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-17-2005, 01:10 PM | #1 |
Zilvia FREAK!
|
DIY skidpad testing
well guysive been reading up on how to do skidpad testing. As far as the math goes, here's what i found:
G= 1.225XR (radius of the circle) DIVIDED BY 2T (the time in seconds it takes to get around the circle) Well when you just simply plug in numbers, saying it took you 16 seconds to get around the skidpad, you end up with... (on a 200ft diameter skidpad) 3.8Gs!?? WTF? why is it coming out so wierd. Someone help me here. I divided by 32 (16x2) and thats what i got. I know this isn't right. Someone wanna help me. |
Sponsored Links |
02-17-2005, 05:04 PM | #2 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tallahassee
Age: 35
Posts: 76
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
that seems to be a bastarization of the physics formula for centripital acceleration.
a = (v^2)/r to find that in g's we do a/g = (v^2)/(rg) remember g= 9.81 m/s^2 anyways v = 2(pi)r/t so we get = ((2(pi)r/t)^2)/rg = (4(pi)^2 * r) / (t^2 * g) ~= 4.02 (r/t^2) now the r of stated circle is 30.48 m pluging in we get = 4.02 (30.48/(16^2)) ~= .48 g's Now I dont know if this is right, but it makes sense from my limited experence with physics. Did some quick google searching http://www.2quicknovas.com/formulas.html : I believe this is the site you found http://www.westernracing.com/reference/formulas.htm : Has the same formula i just dirived but it's in feet units, the previous site just said 2t != t^2 hope this helps. Last edited by 1101; 02-17-2005 at 05:29 PM.. |
02-17-2005, 05:15 PM | #3 |
Zilvia FREAK!
|
^^ wow,way over my head. I found the formula i got in SCC, and other places online, so im almost sure its right, im also sure that im plugging in the numbers wrong. If you care to try again,and put that into words, that would be awesome, but i dont even think i can comprehend what you wrote in taht thing^
|
02-17-2005, 05:31 PM | #4 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tallahassee
Age: 35
Posts: 76
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
http://murray.faithweb.com/formulas.htm
Another site that says it should be t^2 not 2t |
02-17-2005, 06:28 PM | #5 |
Zilvia FREAK!
|
^Thats much more correct sounding. Because then if it took you 16 seconds to get around, itd be more along the lines of .47G's,which still sounds insanely pathetic. Something still isn't adding up. SCC's project Silvia with 225/45/azenis sports went around HALF the 200ft skidpad in 7.13seconds. Soo, figuring it would take about 14 seconds to get around completely.......that would equal .6g's (when their actual number was just over 1g). W.....T......F?
|
02-18-2005, 10:17 AM | #7 |
Leaky Injector
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tallahassee
Age: 35
Posts: 76
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
that 7 s figure was stated as before they tuned th suspension more after their diff change.
going around 1/2 a of a 200ft skid pad in 7 seconds is SLOW (pi)r = 1/2 the distance around the circle finding the rate of travel we divide by time so (pi)r/ t gives us feet / sec multiply by .681 to get miles / hour so going around half that circle in our case would be : [ (pi)(100)/7.13 ] * .681 ~= 30 mph quite slow. They said in the article that there ass end was out for most of it also. I never saw them give any more skid pad figures later to back up their 1+ g reading. |
02-18-2005, 12:14 PM | #8 |
Zilvia FREAK!
|
they ran 7.33 around half the skidpad with everything but their quaife differential. When they put the diff on, they pulled a 7.13. So is this method correct?
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|