|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
S Chassis Technical discussion related to the S Chassis such as the S12, S13, S14, and S15. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-27-2013, 06:47 PM | #1 |
S13 16" vs 17" wheel pros/cons
If there is already a thread on this then go ahead and flame me, but i can't find anything.
Here's the deal, I'm stuck on whether i should run 16x8 or 17x9 wheels. The car is my daily and i occasionally do some drifting too. I need it to be practical but still look nice. I'm not so worried about it being "hellaflush" but obviously i don't want a huge gap either. I like the 16’s cause i can go lower without worrying about the tires rubbing, but i like the 17's cause i don't have to go as low to get rid of wheel gap. To me the 17's look a little classier, but the 16's use cheaper tires and are lighter. With the 16’s i wouldn't have to worry about rubbing when turning, but 17's would probably look better if/when i get a body kit. I'm just so stuck on this. So if someone can give me some opinions, that would be awesome. Also i'd like the see a pic of 17's that arent super flush. All the pics i can find are really flush. I'm getting coilovers at the same time btw. |
|
Sponsored Links |
05-27-2013, 07:23 PM | #2 |
Man w/ CTSV & a Car Seat
|
Why do you think that running a 17" rim will cause you to rub? Rim diameter doesnt mean jack and shit. Tire sizing/diameter and total circumference does, this is why you usually shoot for the same overall diameter as the stock OEM wheel.
|
05-27-2013, 08:02 PM | #3 |
9” is a decent amout wider than stock though. I didn't mean the larger diameter would make it rub but the width. I would need more backspacing and offset to run a 9 inch wheel... I could be totally wrong but that's my thinking.
|
|
05-27-2013, 09:39 PM | #4 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 16,760
Trader Rating: (73)
Feedback Score: 73 reviews
|
What car do you have? That might help.
Are you planning on rolling your fenders? What size tire are you going to get? What offset do you plan on running? 16" tires and 17" tires are almost the same exact price, just 16" tires are harder to find (used) I would NEVER go back to 16s after having a set for a while. on my S14 17x9 looks way too small. I wouldn't do anything smaller than a 9.5 with a 215/45/17 If you have an S13 you can run 17x9 or 17x9.5 +15 or lower offset with 215/40/17 all day if you have rolled fenders and adjustable camber, and have no issues with rubbing It's really up to you and how far you are willing to go to make your set up work. |
05-27-2013, 09:47 PM | #5 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: torrance, ca
Age: 39
Posts: 12,407
Trader Rating: (129)
Feedback Score: 129 reviews
|
Nailed it. Personally I find it much harder to find good tires in decent sizes in 16" and the likelihood of scoring used tires is low. (For drifting purposes, not daily duty)
|
05-28-2013, 07:07 AM | #7 | |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: France - Toulouse
Age: 41
Posts: 1,851
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
17" tires are cheaper, from experience. Now If you are concerned about stance, flush and all that BS, wheel weight is the least of your worries. If you want to go low, keep a good suspension geometry and have good quality dampers / springs, you are looking at a 5000-6000$ price tag on suspension parts. Without labor, wheels, tires, brakes. Just good/custom adjustable suspension arms, good coilovers and corrected knuckles. But as you are already concerned about tire price and stance, i fear you are not going to do this. While i'd really like you do to things correctly, i fear you will be doing like most folks here: crappy isis/ebay adjustable arms, oem knuckes (maybe with ichiba crappy 5 studs conversion), and some cheap hard as a rock ebay coilovers that have form way over function so you can get that low stance without grinding tires on every bump of the road. This is the cheap way. The car wont handle, and will eat through tires ultra fast. The last way is just not to get the car low. It wont cost an arm and a leg, wont require custom knucles or redesigned suspension kit. And this will handle, while being confortable too. TL;DR: cheap, low, handling. pick 2. |
|
05-28-2013, 08:50 AM | #9 |
Just cause i metioned the cheaper tires doesn't mean i'm cheap. I was simply listing it as one of the pro's of 16”wheels. I decided on the 17’s though, if you saw my last comment. And i don't know what the fuck a square g6 is so no.
If you read my first post i said i was NOT worried about stance and flush and all that. I just want to go low enough that it doesn't look retarded and i can get rid of the massive wheel gap. As for suspension i'll admit i was looking at the isis adjustable rear kit. All the reviews i read said it was actually nice quality, including a magazine article. I'm not set on it by any means but it seems like a lot of people are very happy with their isis parts. NOW back to my other question: Will 17x9 +20 be ok for front AND rear or will i need smaller for the front? |
|
05-28-2013, 08:57 AM | #10 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: May 2010
Location: lake mary, Fl
Age: 34
Posts: 1,954
Trader Rating: (26)
Feedback Score: 26 reviews
|
can't you do what everyone else does.... and search the fitment thread?
Not trying to be a ass about it, but figuring this stuff out with all the information provided there is kind of almost too easy..... you don't even have to know how to read, just look at the pretty pictures.
__________________
|
05-28-2013, 09:07 AM | #11 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,772
Trader Rating: (38)
Feedback Score: 38 reviews
|
Quote:
Next time, use the search function for this forum or google. Wheel fitment questions belong in one thread. Find it. |
|
05-28-2013, 09:09 AM | #12 | |
Quote:
|
||
05-28-2013, 11:09 AM | #13 |
Premium Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: torrance, ca
Age: 39
Posts: 12,407
Trader Rating: (129)
Feedback Score: 129 reviews
|
17x9 +20 does NOT stick out of stock fenders. maybe they were running additional spacers.
|
05-29-2013, 02:44 AM | #15 | |||
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: France - Toulouse
Age: 41
Posts: 1,851
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
i use 1.5° camber, 235s on 8" front et35 + extended lower arms (so that should be like an et15 or et10), and it DOES stick out quite a lot. Same goes for the rear. But if you just stretch 205s on it (yes, that is stance too) and run 5° camber, it wont. |
|||
05-29-2013, 10:34 AM | #16 |
I don't think I'm going to be low enough to need any major mods. Just the adjustable camber arms should be enough. So I'll run the 17x9 all around with a slightly stretched tire and I should be good. Cool, thanks for the help guys
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|