|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-06-2004, 07:14 PM | #1 |
93 Octane in a stock 240
The 240 I'm looking at right now has only been powered by 93 Octane gas. I understand 93 Octane is a better grade fuel than Unleaded, but can it have any negative impact on the engine? Does is even make a difference since the engine is normally aspirated? Thanks
|
|
Sponsored Links |
03-06-2004, 07:39 PM | #2 | |
Zilvia Member
|
Quote:
|
|
03-06-2004, 07:53 PM | #4 | |
Zilvia Addict
|
Quote:
|
|
03-06-2004, 08:03 PM | #5 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Don't look now...
Age: 34
Posts: 3,327
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
03-06-2004, 08:05 PM | #6 | |
Zilvia Addict
|
Quote:
(message length) |
|
03-06-2004, 08:24 PM | #7 |
Nissanaholic!
|
On the S14, I have used 93 for the last year since I got it with the exception of being cheap for a couple of weeks. I would over-rev in some situations when using 87 octane and set off the knock sensor. I learned my lesson after having tested the situation by using 87 and getting the error, then switching to 93 without any issues. I am not worried about performance, but moreso detonation due to cheap fuels and costly downtime. Read the sticker on the inside of the gas door...
|
03-06-2004, 09:06 PM | #8 |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Camp Snake Bite, CA *RIP*
Posts: 2,356
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Finally somebody that believes me. Personally I run the highest octane I can afford. Detonation should scare everyone and their mother.
__________________
|
03-06-2004, 11:55 PM | #9 |
Nissanaholic!
|
I run 87 most of the time. I used to run 91, but never noticed a difference in performance. Never had a problem with detonation (I am pretty high altitude, however). Most resources I can find also say it's useless to buy higher grade gas than your car requires. I'm personally a bit more concerned with cheap fuels and modifier deposits than the octane rating of my gas. If you're that concerned, bust out your owners manual and see what it asks for. IIRC, my '92s manual just says 87. . .
I am of the opinion that higher grade gas is really only needed for high compression or forced induction.
__________________
Rowsdower saves us and saves all the world! |
03-07-2004, 12:35 AM | #10 | |
Quote:
|
||
03-07-2004, 12:49 AM | #11 | |
Zilvia Addict
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Woodstock, Georgia
Age: 42
Posts: 652
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
__________________
Fat girls are like scooters...they are fun until your friends see you riding one. "Did you ever think that it could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others?" A -> B |
|
03-07-2004, 03:52 AM | #13 | |
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 48
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
__________________
92 White Pearl Sileighty ~S15 Front ~180SX Kouki tail lights ~S13 Blacktop SR20DET |
|
03-07-2004, 08:54 AM | #14 |
well... it's true lower octane is more likely to detonate, but do you know if 87 or 89 octane will detonate in our cars? i've used 87 for a while, and i don't *think* my car has knocked, but perhaps the ecu retarded timing before i knew it, at least according to what you are saying. so do you have any proof that there is indeed knocking? or that the ignition is retarded when someone uses 87 octane?
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|