View Full Version : SR20det Rocker Arms keep popping
SoCalDrifter
03-07-2014, 01:19 PM
im just about to give up on everything this is the 5th time ive popped a rocker....its killing my track days...i just fully built the whole motor top and bottom end figuring everything will be perfect after that but nope still popping rockers....i have rocker arm stopper, TI dual springs and retainers, everything...
idk what the deal is any info can help....someone said my turbo hits to hard on the rev limiter so it keeps popping it but its a gt30.76R at 18psi idk what to do
Ka-t in progress
03-07-2014, 01:34 PM
Where is your rev limiter set at?
hobbs
03-07-2014, 01:38 PM
First thing would be to get rid of the rocker arm stoppers, if you keep spitting rockers you will damage your motor with a RAS installed.
e1_griego
03-07-2014, 02:34 PM
Are you running AEM?
TheRealSy90
03-07-2014, 04:28 PM
Get rid of the rocker arm stoppers.
Do dual rocker arm guides.
End thread.
e1_griego
03-07-2014, 04:29 PM
^ You always mention that. Details?
jr_ss
03-07-2014, 06:17 PM
It's just taking the "guide" shim(one with the slot) and utilizing it on both sides of the rocker arm instead of one side with the completely flat one. Keeps rockers from kicking sideways, which is the major reason they fly off.
SoCalDrifter
03-08-2014, 12:02 AM
Where is your rev limiter set at?
7200
First thing would be to get rid of the rocker arm stoppers, if you keep spitting rockers you will damage your motor with a RAS installed.
i thought it was better to have a RAS so it doesnt do as much damage if one were to pop off
Are you running AEM?
ya aem v1
Get rid of the rocker arm stoppers.
Do dual rocker arm guides.
End thread.
gunna look into those havent heard of them
TheRealSy90
03-08-2014, 09:33 AM
You run a guide shims on both arms of the rocker. It's as easy as it sounds. Why bandaid the problem with stoppers that do more damage than good when you can fix the problem completely. You just have to machine the other arm of the rocker to allow it to fit inside the guide shim.
e1_griego
03-08-2014, 09:36 AM
Thanks for the explanation.
I have seen a lot of SR cars with AEM kick rocker arms -- maybe someone else can weigh in on the technical explanation.
SoCalDrifter
03-08-2014, 09:51 AM
You run a guide shims on both arms of the rocker. It's as easy as it sounds. Why bandaid the problem with stoppers that do more damage than good when you can fix the problem completely. You just have to machine the other arm of the rocker to allow it to fit inside the guide shim.
with or without RAS? wouldnt it be better to have RAS so incase it does break a rocker doesnt mess up the valves...seems like the dual guide shims is like its made to keep rockers from popping off...either way going to do this when i put it back together
TheRealSy90
03-08-2014, 09:55 AM
The thing is, rocker arm stoppers usually just cause the rockers to snap when they decide to throw. But with dual guides you will not throw a rocker arm, so there is no use for the RAS. But it's up to you if you want to leave them installed, they just won't do anything.
SoCalDrifter
03-08-2014, 10:21 AM
The thing is, rocker arm stoppers usually just cause the rockers to snap when they decide to throw. But with dual guides you will not throw a rocker arm, so there is no use for the RAS. But it's up to you if you want to leave them installed, they just won't do anything.
o ok cool thanks for the help gunna do that later today
if anyone has any other ideas throw them out there im only giving this motor till the end of the month to shape up or its out of here hah
EDacIouSX
03-11-2014, 02:38 AM
Wow, very interesting about removing ras.
Sent from my HTC6500LVW using Tapatalk
sil80dude
03-14-2014, 10:28 AM
The guides for the rocker arms are all one size the shims are not! Its important to have those shims and have them be the right size for proper valvetrain wear. You should go solid lifters shimmed properly and keep the RAS
SoCalDrifter
03-14-2014, 03:47 PM
The guides for the rocker arms are all one size the shims are not! Its important to have those shims and have them be the right size for proper valvetrain wear. You should go solid lifters shimmed properly and keep the RAS
going to try tomeis upgraded rocker arms and if after that it still blows those imma loose my mind
VNG704
03-14-2014, 04:19 PM
Stupid question but I assume the shims are the correct sizes?
SoCalDrifter
03-14-2014, 05:27 PM
Stupid question but I assume the shims are the correct sizes?
shims are stock size on stock rockers
VNG704
03-15-2014, 08:01 AM
shims are stock size on stock rockers
Did you have them in order and put back with same rockers and guides that they were with originally? I'm just thinking it's possible the height is off which may cause them to pop. There is a variable difference in height that is okay, but it is very small. Do a search but I think within .025mm difference in height between a shim and that same rocker's guide is okay. If you didn't measure them then I would go back and measure before buying new things and hoping it solves the problem. Hope that helps.
SoCalDrifter
03-18-2014, 04:11 PM
http://www.ebay.com/itm/TOMEI-SR20-DET-ROCKER-HYDRAULIC-PIVOT-LIFTER-STOPPER-KIT-Nissan-S13-S14-S15-/120943304594?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item1c28c85f92&vxp=mtr
has anyone heard of this or used them before???
TheRealSy90
03-19-2014, 07:17 AM
Here's the thing, all the guide shims are the same size, and since you want to do dual guide shims on all the rockers, you don't have to worry about mixing up the shims because they are the same size. The hydraulic lifter will take care of the MINUTE size difference between the guide shims and the flat shims. Trust me, i've done it before and it works flawlessly. If you are really that anal about it, get the guide shims matched to the thickness of the flat shims that you are replacing, one by one. Remember, you have to shave the outside left arm of the rocker so that it fits all the way into the guide shim. It's honestly super easy to do.
santasnowman
03-19-2014, 07:32 AM
Buy a VE head. Problem solved. :P
SoCalDrifter
03-19-2014, 12:17 PM
Here's the thing, all the guide shims are the same size, and since you want to do dual guide shims on all the rockers, you don't have to worry about mixing up the shims because they are the same size. The hydraulic lifter will take care of the MINUTE size difference between the guide shims and the flat shims. Trust me, i've done it before and it works flawlessly. If you are really that anal about it, get the guide shims matched to the thickness of the flat shims that you are replacing, one by one. Remember, you have to shave the outside left arm of the rocker so that it fits all the way into the guide shim. It's honestly super easy to do.
whats all done to your SR? have you popped/broken a rocker since you've done the dual guide shims? ive been thinking about doing that but one of my friends thats been workin on SRs for awhile doesnt like the idea this is the only place ive heard of it being done
Buy a VE head. Problem solved. :P
alittle late for that now ive already built the whole head id just be dropping another 2.5k to do that.. id rather put a V8 in and sell the whole SR
tommyboi
03-19-2014, 09:55 PM
Have you shimmed your head properly with a shim plate(Kent Moore plate, I have one and would sell it if needed) or something like the rps sport shim tool with dial indicator? Also are your hydraulic lifters bleed correctly and not worn out? Did you get a valve job done and they did not check valve stem height? Are you running big cams with aggressive lift with soft valve springs? All of this could be your problem.
If memory serves me right, each shim just has to be leveled with the right side of the arm for each rocker arm.
There's a bunch of crazy things you can do like the mazworx valve stem conversion, idea behind is that less mass = less force.
I have not had a problem with my built head. But I'm not running anything crazy... I hit the rev limiter quite a bit also.
Super tech beehive dual springs
[email protected] with titanium retainers.
Super tech valve stem seals
Hks 264 step 1 in/exhaust
Nissan oem valves
Nissan oem rocker arms
Valve guides re-sleeved with liners
3 angle valve job and shimmed with Kent Moore plate.
SoCalDrifter
03-19-2014, 10:31 PM
ok so after a few days of looking around on what to do im gunna start out by doing tomei solid lifters with the test shims to make sure everythings perfect and even and then im gunna take it out and drive it.... if it blows a rocker again then ill do the dual guide rocker mod thingy and then take it out after that... if it does it after that:picardfp:i give up
Drakkar
03-26-2014, 08:11 PM
You can order guides in different thicknesses. I am running a solid set up with dual guide conversion. I had my valves tipped so all of my guides were the same size. When you go to do it just make sure you measure the valve lash correctly. There is a thread on this website for it. You will find that each guide maybe a different size. That is OK as long as they are within tolerance with the base circle of the cam on the rocker.
Here is a link for guides. You can find them cheaper if you look around.
Just have the machine shop match the relief cut on the other side of the rocker.
http://www.frsport.com/Nissan-13218-53J00-Valve-Rocker-Guide-for-Solid-Pivot---Hydraulic-Lash-SR20DET-3mm_p_60078.html
SoCalDrifter
03-27-2014, 03:30 PM
just ordered the mazworxs dual rocker arm guide conversion kit with brand new rockers already grinded down so this motorfucker should be bullet proof
i should be all done and running it next weekend ill let you guys know how it goes
SoCalDrifter
04-14-2014, 12:29 PM
ok so i got the solid lifters and new rockers w/ dual guide shims in and the lifters are really loud and i think there especially loud since im running lash type cams on solid lifters so im gunna order the right tomei 270 cams and get it all tuned up and go beat on her...hopefully she can take it:x: otherwise :madfawk: the SR
TheRealSy90
04-14-2014, 06:30 PM
I don't understand why you did solid lifters if you also did dual guides. Go back to the hydrolic lifters and you won't have all that valvetrain noise... Solid lifters are a waste of money with no performance benefit.
Also, i'm curious how much mazworx charged you for machined rockers and dual guides. I do it locally for people for 20 bucks lol.
SoCalDrifter
04-14-2014, 08:51 PM
I don't understand why you did solid lifters if you also did dual guides. Go back to the hydrolic lifters and you won't have all that valvetrain noise... Solid lifters are a waste of money with no performance benefit.
Also, i'm curious how much mazworx charged you for machined rockers and dual guides. I do it locally for people for 20 bucks lol.
i did both so ill never have to worry about rockers ever blowing up again.....ever.... it literly happened everytime i went to the track my turbo just hits really hard at redline so thats why I didnt think the hydrolics could handle it and its says the solids are made for high reving and thats exactly what im doing so seemed ideal.... and mazworx was only 70 people around here havent heard of it or thought it was sketchy so i didnt trust them and just went with the people who know to do it right
SoCalDrifter
04-14-2014, 08:52 PM
and now tomei's back ordered till the end of may on cams and frsport had the one i need and i called back and it was already sold....what are the chances... so now im on the search otherwise a long shitty down time again
TheRealSy90
04-14-2014, 10:38 PM
Are you revving higher than 7500rpm? If not then the turbo isn't going to have any effect on the hydrolic lifter's performance. That is really just an rpm issue, and i've only heard of the aem rev limiter being the one that tends to throw rocker arms due to the gain/how fast it hits the limiter. And like I said, with dual guides the rocker cannot throw, so the solid lifter has no benefit. Might as well put rocker arm stoppers on it as well.
SoCalDrifter
04-16-2014, 02:35 AM
Are you revving higher than 7500rpm? If not then the turbo isn't going to have any effect on the hydrolic lifter's performance. That is really just an rpm issue, and i've only heard of the aem rev limiter being the one that tends to throw rocker arms due to the gain/how fast it hits the limiter. And like I said, with dual guides the rocker cannot throw, so the solid lifter has no benefit. Might as well put rocker arm stoppers on it as well.
when i was blowing up rockers it would only occur when i hit or was bouncing off the rev limiter to long/much so at like 7400rpm and i had a RAS even then wasnt doing the trick so thats why i got solid lifters and cams and dual guide shims so i can turn the rev limiter up a good amount
SoCalDrifter
04-23-2014, 11:49 AM
so got the car tuned put down about 450-470whp on the dyno at 8500rpms took it out to the track yesterday for some testing everything was running perfect until my stupid clutch fan broke and messed up my water pump and ended the day gunna go out again on thursday so far so good with the setup.....finally
Drakkar
04-23-2014, 12:11 PM
solid lifters are good for high rpm. The hydraulic lifters are noisy when they get old. Street vs race take your pick. Have you already installed your guides? what size did you end up going with?
SoCalDrifter
04-23-2014, 02:10 PM
solid lifters are good for high rpm. The hydraulic lifters are noisy when they get old. Street vs race take your pick. Have you already installed your guides? what size did you end up going with?
ya installed the dual guides along with tomei solid 260 intake cam and 270 exhaust cam just because thats all i could get my hands on since tomei is back ordered about a month on cams but pretty happy with the 260/270 alittle more pick up
TheRealSy90
04-23-2014, 06:49 PM
solid lifters are good for high rpm. The hydraulic lifters are noisy when they get old. Street vs race take your pick. Have you already installed your guides? what size did you end up going with?
oem Guide shims are all the same thickness.
SoCalDrifter
04-23-2014, 11:08 PM
solid lifters are good for high rpm. The hydraulic lifters are noisy when they get old. Street vs race take your pick. Have you already installed your guides? what size did you end up going with?
o ya if your talking about guide shims i just used stock
AJZax
04-24-2014, 04:20 PM
What springs did you go with?
All R.A.S. will do the same thing, don't waste time with them. Doesn't matter the brand.
I took mine and sat on the rev limiter at 8k for 4 minutes, almost straight, just TONS of rev limiter. I'm running tomei dual springs and ti retainers. OEM hydro lifters, factory shims and guides, on oversized valves (light ferrea and BC ones [don't ask why they're mismatched, I don't want to talk about it hahaha]) and I'm running 270 tomei pro cams. 12.5mm lift? (could be wrong it's from memory)
What cams are you running with what springs?
Every spring has a resonance, and at certain RPMs this can resonate "just right" to prevent the spring from functioning normally, there's also spring bind. This is where dual valve springs are great because it staggers the "efficiency" ranges, which makes it so there's always an effective spring.
Be careful with too heavy of springs also, as at idle with too stiff of spring you can start burning cams with an idle set too low.
TheRealSy90
04-24-2014, 06:11 PM
Camp ramp has a lot to do with it as well. JWT cams can run rev limiter all day on a stock sr with no problem, BC not so much say goodbye to rocker arms without dual guides or upgrades lol.
SoCalDrifter
04-25-2014, 12:25 PM
What springs did you go with?
All R.A.S. will do the same thing, don't waste time with them. Doesn't matter the brand.
I took mine and sat on the rev limiter at 8k for 4 minutes, almost straight, just TONS of rev limiter. I'm running tomei dual springs and ti retainers. OEM hydro lifters, factory shims and guides, on oversized valves (light ferrea and BC ones [don't ask why they're mismatched, I don't want to talk about it hahaha]) and I'm running 270 tomei pro cams. 12.5mm lift? (could be wrong it's from memory)
What cams are you running with what springs?
Every spring has a resonance, and at certain RPMs this can resonate "just right" to prevent the spring from functioning normally, there's also spring bind. This is where dual valve springs are great because it staggers the "efficiency" ranges, which makes it so there's always an effective spring.
Be careful with too heavy of springs also, as at idle with too stiff of spring you can start burning cams with an idle set too low.
I have BC TI dual springs and retainers with Tomei solid lifters and tomei solid 270 ex cam and 260 intake cam with 12.5mm lift.....took it out to the track last night running like a beast was at like 7-8 in 2nd gear all night a 3rd gear 5-6k (small track only can get it in 3rd for a few seconds)
GroundPerformance
04-25-2014, 01:49 PM
Will all that money on the headwork. A stock VVL head swap would have been a better move.
SoCalDrifter
04-25-2014, 10:42 PM
Will all that money on the headwork. A stock VVL head swap would have been a better move.
ya i thought that half way threw but it was to late
TheRealSy90
03-24-2015, 01:26 PM
So how has it been working out for you? Next move for me is installing oem hydo lifters from a roller-rocker sr20de. They have larger oil ports and perform like solid lifters at high rpm, but are still quiet at low rpm and require no maintenance or periodic measurements like solid lifter kits.
Kingtal0n
03-24-2015, 02:15 PM
I am surprised nobody mentioned the fuel cut setting in the AEM vs. spark cut.
Isn't the ignition cut notorious for causing rocker problems?
First thing i would do is make your rev limiter fuel only, and soften it. Off at 7200 on at 6970 something like that.
TheRealSy90
03-24-2015, 02:17 PM
Yeah that's seemed to be the consensus regarding AEM limiter issues. I know the oem ecu uses a combination fuel/ignition cut that is fairly kind to rocker arms.
I always thought that a strictly fuel cut rev limiter would cause a lean issue since you are still on the throttle, and possible engine damage?
Kingtal0n
03-24-2015, 02:30 PM
Yeah that's seemed to be the consensus regarding AEM limiter issues. I know the oem ecu uses a combination fuel/ignition cut that is fairly kind to rocker arms.
I always thought that a strictly fuel cut rev limiter would cause a lean issue since you are still on the throttle, and possible engine damage?
The ecu is either injecting fuel, or not. There is never a situation where it will only inject "some" fuel. The ecu makes a decision call, before the intake valve even opens (usually) whether to inject or not. The AEM instruction manual specifically says injector phasing should be timed such that the end of the injector pulse is before the intake valve opens. It also says "never inject fuel into an open valve".
A lean condition can only happen if you have a not quite enough fuel, as if your fuel pressure drops ~10psi and you lose 12% of your injector capacity. If it goes much leaner than that, it will misfire. There is not much room for error, not to mention that a lean condition in an sr20det, from experience I am talking now, does not by itself cause immediate damage if the engine is tuned properly. the lean condition might take a few WOT passes (yes complete passes on a dyno for instance) before the heat builds up to the point where it ruins your piston rings. A single, complete, leaning out to (17:1),WOT pass, on a built sr20det with forgies and proper ignition timing, 20psi of boost on pump gas 93 octane 420BHP, will not hurt anything. Yes it the EGT will sky rocket and your warning light will go off to cool down the engine, but it will live. So Even if it were possible to be "slightly lean sometimes because of a rev-limiter related failure" even that should not have any lasting consequences. OEM engines are different though, the OEM pistons/rings do not tolerate these 17:1 WOT passes, so don't try that.
Spark cuts on the other hand lend all sorts of dangerous situations. You remove the spark but not the fuel- where does the fuel go? Some of it stays behind, the rest dumps into the exhaust system where it probably explodes as it passes the turbine. Good for spooling that turbine, bad for the engine, for many reasons that I am unfamiliar with. I could guess that it isn't good for the cylinder walls and rings, and I could guess that the residual fuel will interact and alter your next cylinder event, in perhaps unpredictable ways (the fuel is no longer atomized and suspended, ready for a proper burn) but these are just guesses. I am sure you could google "ignition cut engine failures" or "2-step ignition engine failures" or similar to get a few pictures of engines that fell apart while sitting on a spark cut.
TheRealSy90
03-24-2015, 02:40 PM
Yeah I didn't mean that it injects "some" fuel, but that it alternates between fuel cut and ignition cut while hitting the rev limiter. Well that is what Martin at R.S.Enthalpy told me about the factory ecu limiter. That it is neither strictly fuel nor ignition.
Kingtal0n
03-24-2015, 03:13 PM
Yeah I didn't mean that it injects "some" fuel, but that it alternates between fuel cut and ignition cut while hitting the rev limiter. Well that is what Martin at R.S.Enthalpy told me about the factory ecu limiter. That it is neither strictly fuel nor ignition.
I did some quick searching around... for similar topics
http://www.sr20-forum.com/tunercode/29491-rev-limiter-discussion.html
http://www.sr20-forum.com/tuning/1430-stock-rev-limit-what.html#post19535
http://www.sr20-forum.com/tuning/43959-rev-limiters.html
The puddle I referred to is called the "Tau"? puddle, and is referenced in a lot of tuning books I've read. It has been very difficult to actually piece all of this information together for me. It seems like every other person I talk to has conflicting statements about whether or not it would cause detonation. Some said there is not enough fuel to actually combust. I've talked to several tuners about this puddle, and a lot of them looked at me funny, scratching their heads.
I even brought it up to JWT and their tech said they have never heard of this. The factory Nissan computer cuts injectors one at a time for the rev limit.
I had my ignition cut set at 7400rpm with the JWT limiter at 7500rpm and I would still "bounce" the limiter. I set the MSD to 7300rpm and it stops right there! Also, the torque curve suggests that the MSD pulls timing by a few degrees on the top just before the actual cut. It makes it very very smooth. Look at my 3rd gear burnout video and you can see how smooth it is.
"Apparently spark cut comes from the days of carbs before fuel could be cut. Most people recommend and prefer a fuel cut. I'm not 100% convinced it's completely safe although it's going to be better than a strict spark cut.
I still think cutting both at the same time is best or if you have to then cut fuel first immediately followed by spark. There must be a reason why it isn't traditionally done that way since it seems so simple, easy, and effective. I feel like I'm missing something. "
"The QR25 rev limiter cuts fuel.
No late model OEM car cuts spark, it would be very
damaging to the cat."
"Here is how the current rev limiter works. There is a cut within the control range (smooth cutting), then there is a hard cut following that. The control range cut is all based around a percentage cut. The percentage can be considered a percentage of power reduction. The control range is below the RPM limit set in the table. In the advanced settings you can adjust the percentage cut at the start and end of the control range. The percentage cut at any point within the control range is interpolated from the start and end cut. The percentage is the number of missed firing events over a fixed number of firing events. Say for example the fixed number of firing events is 32 and the percentage cut is calculated to be 25% at a specific RPM. This means that over the 32 events, 8 of them will be missed, this spread out across the 32 events means that every 4th event will be missed. Hence reducing the power output from the motor by 25%. This same principle works for any given percentage. The hard cut is obviously all cylinders completely cut until the RPM falls below the hard cut activation. Adjusting the start and end cuts controls how aggressive the limit comes on. You will notice that there is a TPLow and TP100%, this if for correcting the start cut based engine load. (You don't need such an aggressive cut at lighter loads). This system of cutting allows you to have a limit that holds a perfectly stable RPM. Having a perfectly stable RPM limit allows for much more repeatable launches when using launch control. The choice between fuel and ignition cut is based on the application, there are pros and cons to both. Launch control typically calls for ignition cutting as it allows fuel to burn in the exhaust, banging and helping the turbo to spool up. With ignition cutting the chance of detonation is very small. The downside to ignition cutting is the banging in the exhaust can force the exhaust valves open, this can take load of shims (they may fall out) or it could allow a hydraulic lifter to pump up meaning the exhaust valve won't close fully. Heavy duty valve springs protects against this problem. The final problem with ignition cut is that it destroys catalytic converters, hence stopping factory from ever cutting the ignition. Fuel cutting eliminates the banging exhaust and keeps the exhaust valves happy, but can punish the bottom end instead. Detonation is common when fuel cutting (explained by Kieran's last post). Even factory cars detonate on the fuel limiter. Even though detonation is not ideal, engines can withstand it, as long as its not too extreme. When Nissan designed its factory rev limiter they probably weren't thinking that people would drive down the road wide open throttle on the rev limiter, although in saying that the cars were sold with a warranty. Rev limiting is never going to be good for the engine, but if its necessary do it and you engine will probably be fine. I know from experience that stock sr20 heads don't like ignition cuts as the hydraulic lifters pump up and hold the valves open, causing the motor to run on less that 4 cylinders for a few seconds. There is rev limit ignition trim which is ideal for fuel cut as it reduces the chance of detonation. If you want your fuel cut to be more aggressive like the stock, turn advanced mode on, change the control range from 200 down to 100, and you will start to see results. The next thing to do is increase the start cut values. Hope this points you in the right direction. "
From what I gather, our sr20det ecu is fuel cut only, and it does so by eliminating 1 cylinder at a time up to the "hard cut" limit. So is the power FC afaik.
AEM has the option to cut both, and the factory configuration file is set for spark first (like a "race" car with no cat). Which is why I posted to begin with- that initial spark cut was probably causing the symptoms they described in several threads, causing rocker failure.
Kingtal0n
03-24-2015, 03:29 PM
more info
high performance hyabusa,
fuel cut first, "soft" followed by a hard full cut of simultaneously fuel/spark
http://www.hayabusa.org/forum/nitrous/101809-rev-limiter-does-cut-fuel-spark.html
http://honda-tech.com/drag-racing-36/fuel-cut-spark-cut-rev-limiter-1981086/
"Dont cut fuel while using nitrous..."
Originally Posted by tony1
It cuts the injector completely for a cycle, it doesn't cut the injector in the middle of a cycle, it does not create a lean condition because there is no fuel in the cylinder when it happens. OEM's wouldn't do it if it could damage an engine...
Your bearings would have spun regardless of the type of cut you used.
amen brother.i have been using fuel cut on mine for about 5 years now with no problems.mine bangs the rev limiter many,many times each pass.
Traction control
http://www.racelogic.co.uk/index.php/en/racelogic-products/other-products/racelogic-traction-control#how-it-works
Cutting a single injector pulse:
The idea of cutting fuel to an engine sets alarm bells ringing in engine builders, as they all know that running a lean combustion mode will elevate in-cylinder temperatures very rapidly. The denser the air/fuel charge, the more heat the lean burn can generate. Therefore it is vital that a fuel cut system will not cause a lean burn.
RACELOGIC Traction Control prevents lean burn by removing 100% of the pulsed fuel delivery – essentially the affected cylinder takes a gulp of fresh air; the in-cylinder temperature remains virtually unaffected.
Prolonged fuel cut on one particular cylinder would cause scavenging of the petrol lining the inlet tracts, and when the next full fuel pulse arrived, it would be partially reduced in quantity by the re-wetting of these tracts. RACELOGIC Traction Control rotates cylinder cutting to prevent this situation from occurring."
TheRealSy90
03-24-2015, 03:53 PM
Lots of really great information in those posts, that is probably way over the head of the average 240sx owner haha. The posts about the TAO puddle are very intriguing.
I know from experience that stock sr20 heads don't like ignition cuts as the hydraulic lifters pump up and hold the valves open, causing the motor to run on less that 4 cylinders for a few seconds.
Now this really caught my eye. I have noticed a few times after going to the Entlaphy ROM tune, that there have been a couple instances where I hit the rev limiter, and then it seemed that the engine would have a brief missfire afterwards. Maybe the rom tune is now using a spark cut to an extent, causing this "lifter pump up" and valves to not close all the way briefly. I mean even a split second is still hundreds of rpm when compared to how high we are revving. This is the first time i've read about this issue, as i'm sure it's coming from someone with tons more experience. Those fwd forums really have the best tech guys haha.
So unfortunately there are pro's and con's of both spark and fuel limiting. And figuring out the best mixture of the two seems to be the way to go. I'm curious if anybody has managed to configue the rev limiter to hold a perfectly steady rpm, as they do with the lower rpm "launch control", which should be the least jarring to the valvetrain and engine as well.
TheRealSy90
01-29-2016, 02:55 AM
I am surprised nobody mentioned the fuel cut setting in the AEM vs. spark cut.
Isn't the ignition cut notorious for causing rocker problems?
First thing i would do is make your rev limiter fuel only, and soften it. Off at 7200 on at 6970 something like that.
Bumping this. Is it possible to set an AEM rev limiter to hold a "constant" rpm, so that the rpms aren't really bouncing up and down?
So did we reach a consensus that fuel cut is the way to go, so on an AEM would I want to disable the spark cut completely and strictly rely on the fuel cut settings? Not sure if that's even possible haven't looked in my tuner software in a while.
Kingtal0n
01-29-2016, 05:01 PM
Yes fuel cut, set it softly well before your actual redline. On an OEM bottom end, the OEM redline being around 7200rpm, I set my rev limiter to around 6800 for street cars. You don't want to spin much higher than that on a tight OEM bearing. It's just a safety precaution I take when people say they want to drive for 100k+ miles, this is one of the little things you can do to get the engine to last 10+ years, is to be generous with the RPM limiting (its just a "fun" car, no competition, so minimize risk) Its different if you have an aftermarket tricoat bearing with a .0022" clearance, then you can go to the sky and use a thicker oil. I've taken those to 8200rpm on the OEM lifters, no trouble, but I wouldn't do it repeatedly.
If you set the spark limiter much higher than you will ever go, you wont ever touch it. Newer versions of AEM have different models for fuel cut. The latest versions cut individual cylinders one at a time until the threshold for a softer cut. I am not sure when they started doing that though.
Croustibat
01-30-2016, 05:56 PM
Bumping this. Is it possible to set an AEM rev limiter to hold a "constant" rpm, so that the rpms aren't really bouncing up and down?
The way to do this is to retard timing a lot. Be aware this is going to produce a lot of heat.
TheRealSy90
01-31-2016, 09:20 AM
Kind of weird how when i was on the stock ecu years ago it revved to 7500 sometimes 7550 if I flat shifted.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.