|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
S Chassis Technical discussion related to the S Chassis such as the S12, S13, S14, and S15. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
06-27-2010, 11:08 AM | #1 |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Age: 33
Posts: 1,116
Trader Rating: (1)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Z32 Upright Discussion (coilovers, binding, unsprung weight)
I got a really good deal on an entire z32 rear upright coming with full calipers all around. I really want to put them in because of the weight advantage of losing unsprung weight, but figuring out whether powered by max has a z32 rear perch has been one issue along with a few others.
1. Anybody know any other manufacturers, (megan, Stance) that use the same coilover thread and coilover diameters as the powered by max where I can use the z32 rear coilover mounts on my powered by max coilovers? 2. After seeing issues with bushing movement, as well as potential binding, rubbing of mounts, etc, what are solutions. I see that a high articulation spherical such as what skullworks is selling seems to be a good option, but I havent seen images of what that looks like with a coilover, including clearances the toe arm/upright itself. Spherical is pretty pricey but you have to pay to play. 3. Or with these concerns, should i ditch the upright all together. I will be doing full z32 brakes with the rear ebrake and figure might as well swap the upright on, but im concerned with issues like this, then it may not be the upgrade for me, though i read in one bind thread, one guy removed his after some bad coilover rubbing, but claimed he had a noticeable difference due to the ~8lb reduction in unsprung weight. Opinions/solutions?
__________________
Hookers and blow. |
Sponsored Links |
06-27-2010, 11:35 AM | #2 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Misawa, Japan
Posts: 6,815
Trader Rating: (8)
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
|
I have my old bottom mounts off my Stances you can check the size and thread pitch with.
as for the bushing bindage I think thats only an issue with S14's Heres how mine sit right now
__________________
後輪駆動車1番 1989 Built SR GT2871R -363whp 1998 S14 W/RB25- 250ish (For Now) 1986 SR86 - 200ish 1990 R32 GTR - 320hp Don't Buy Engines from JDM-Online http://zilvia.net/f/businesses/207457-jdm-online.html Don't Buy XS-Power or SSAC Shit |
06-27-2010, 01:11 PM | #3 |
Guild of Skullduggerous Intent
|
OP - what s-chassis do you have?
S13 will be fine, no binding S14 will have an issue friends (and what I plan to do) grind a portion of the shock mount at an angle to get clearance with the coilover forks sphericals on an S13 are nice but not a necessity on an s14 they are IMO the angle that the coilover with the z32 uprights will lead to binding another option that I'm contemplating is taking the z32 to a fabricator and have the shock mount cut, clocked and welded to correct that misalignment angle on a note, if it's within your budge to get spherical do so the difference in articulation is worth it auto-xers and road racers swear by them even on stock uprights |
06-27-2010, 01:43 PM | #4 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,701
Trader Rating: (16)
Feedback Score: 16 reviews
|
Spherical bearings in ANY pivot on the rear of our cars is an absolutely huge upgrade. On an S14 with Z32 uprights it's basically a necessity from the high angle. If you run your car very low, you might need to slightly file the upright itself(the angle gets worse with travel), but they're a huge upgrade that you can immediately feel. Think about it, it'd be like going from a 20 lb wheel to a 13 wheel right there - absolutely huge.
Sphericals in all the other suspension pivots just let the suspension move without binding. With spherical bearings you can move the rear suspension up and down with one hand(without the coilover on there of course) - it's that low friction. Try that with rubber bushings, or even worse, polyurethane.
__________________
S13 Hatch - Goes around tracks quickly DEFSPORT |
06-27-2010, 02:18 PM | #5 |
Post Whore!
|
If you have an s14 forget it.... Unless you have a way to cut and correct the angle of the shock mount like the R14.
I had them on my s14... after grinding them down for clearance they would still bind and made my car handle like shit. Even with a spherical in there I believe the angle still messes with handling. The weight difference is noticable but not a huge deal. Poly bushings are a nice upgrade if you trim the sides down to keep them from binding when you tighten them and keep them lubed(zerk fittings). Edit: I take this back... Def is right.... poly bushings are horrible when installed in the uprights because they just create too much friction to let the sleeves rotate when the suspension travels. Might as well keep OEM rubber or go spherical. Last edited by az_240; 06-30-2014 at 03:33 AM.. |
06-27-2010, 03:14 PM | #6 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,701
Trader Rating: (16)
Feedback Score: 16 reviews
|
Quote:
Poly bushings suck in the upright IMO. No amount of messing with them or lube will ever fix them not wanting to rotate axially as the suspension moves through its travel. They're the worst choice of bushing material for this type of pivot point that has multi-axis rotation.
__________________
S13 Hatch - Goes around tracks quickly DEFSPORT |
|
06-28-2010, 12:40 PM | #7 | |
Guild of Skullduggerous Intent
|
Quote:
the spherical solves it, seen it on a couple of friends cars Poly bushes felt ok on smooth roads on mediocre ones, felt like driving on train tracks |
|
06-27-2010, 02:41 PM | #8 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Misawa, Japan
Posts: 6,815
Trader Rating: (8)
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
|
OP's got an S13 so he's GTG
__________________
後輪駆動車1番 1989 Built SR GT2871R -363whp 1998 S14 W/RB25- 250ish (For Now) 1986 SR86 - 200ish 1990 R32 GTR - 320hp Don't Buy Engines from JDM-Online http://zilvia.net/f/businesses/207457-jdm-online.html Don't Buy XS-Power or SSAC Shit |
06-28-2010, 01:08 AM | #9 |
Post Whore!
|
My poly bushings are pretty solid... more so than stock that is for sure. Trim them and keep them lubed and there shouldnt be any problems.
Sphericals would be nice but for that kind of money I'd rather get something cooler. |
06-28-2010, 12:31 PM | #10 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 47
Posts: 13,812
Trader Rating: (12)
Feedback Score: 12 reviews
|
When I did mine, Tein wouldn't sell Z32 fork mounts so I took a pair of old Z32 shocks and cut them up, then cut the ball mount off my HEs and welded the fork on, but at a slight angle, after setting the ride height and preload. The only issue is I can't change the ride height now without a full turn of the lower mount, but it takes some of the binding away by having it sit tilted a little. Still, the bearing is a much better choice and had they been available a decade ago I would have done them.
__________________
FORMERLY R240NA Learn what's really going on and protect your assets now before they're gone forever: www.paypalsucks.com |
06-28-2010, 12:35 PM | #11 |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Age: 33
Posts: 1,116
Trader Rating: (1)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Ok, I'm gonna experiment for powered by max coilover users for lower mounts, When I get a chance, i'll try the stances of sileighty 85, if not I've read that potentially some Honda coilover perches may also work, if so, i have a friend with a spare prelude lower perch that i could try.
Thanks for the insight guys, I didn't know it was a difference between s13 and s14 binding issues, so now I'm definitely leaning towards putting them on the car.
__________________
Hookers and blow. |
06-28-2010, 03:29 PM | #12 |
Post Whore!
|
^they must have taken a lot off the upright to get it to clear okay... my main issue is still the angle of the shock mount(on s14) which does not change with sphericals... that much angle cannot be good.
I know what you mean when you say driving on train tracks.... my poly bushings were "sandwiched" between the mounting tabs making it very hard for the suspension to travel. Once I trim them so the inner sleeve sticks out more it should help with that problem. |
08-20-2011, 11:26 PM | #13 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Oregon
Age: 39
Posts: 2,474
Trader Rating: (8)
Feedback Score: 8 reviews
|
not to bump a dead thread, but for future searchers, you need to remove the metal seal from your 240 axle and keep the rubber ones in the Z32 upright, as well as know that Z32 f(at least stance) are about 3/4 in shorter than S14 end cups, so you loose that ability to keep your car at a decent height for 255 to 285 wide tires.
|
05-30-2014, 02:05 PM | #15 |
Leaky Injector
|
How about I un-zombie this thread with something I've been working on for my racecar?
S-chassis rear coilovers on Z32 upright, with a cheap little adapter kit sound good? Not pictured, there's a slug that gets installed instead of the bushing with 2 holes in it, you then bolt the black bracket onto that, and then bolt in the S-chassis strut bottom into that... aligning the directions of everything is also super simple, and the slug can be installed backwards to adjust the strut position as needed Most of the solutions I've seen for this involve making either a custom fork for the coilover, or cutting and welding the cast aluminum mount, which introduces it's own problems I am aware that some S13's are slamming their suspension to a point where every last thread counts, and with this adapter you will lose about 40-45mm of maximum slammage, so it will be up to you to figure out if your setup can accommodate it... S14 or subframe swapped Z31's shouldn't have any issues The axis of the slug needs to match the strut axis at ride height when looking from the front, the strut can then be attached to the upper tabs by through bolt, which gets tightened at ride height (just like any bushing) I did investigate making a bracket that mounts the strut in various directions around the Z32 upright's bushing pod, and in every case, there was interference or weakness, this seemed to be the only sensible way The bracket is 1045 steel, e-coated, the slug will be anodized aluminum, with all zinc plated fasteners and locknuts... the bracket weights about 280 grams, I expect the total kit will add around .5KG to each corner The additional weight is easily offset for most coilovers, because the z32 fork style bottoms are generally steel, at least the ones you are likely to have modified, whereas the S13 style bottoms are aluminum... after saving ~8lbs according to some threads going with the aluminum upright, you might actually turn out weight neutral |
06-10-2014, 02:49 AM | #20 |
Leaky Injector
|
Everything arrived, fairly painless install, used a flapper wheel on a dremel to clean out the hole, after cutting out the bushing, sprayed with wd40, used a long m10 screw with big washers to draw it in against a cross bar with a hole in it...
Then I just leaned on the bracket to line it up, and rammed the bolts through, voila! |
10-13-2014, 07:15 PM | #21 | |
Leaky Injector
|
Quote:
|
|
08-13-2014, 11:05 AM | #26 |
Leaky Injector
|
Ok, I got that the S14 has binding issues, and the S13 dont... buuutttt, what if your S13 has an S14 rear subframe?
Also, Im in need of those adapters... anybody use them yet? |
08-14-2014, 05:48 PM | #27 |
Zilvia Addict
|
The binding issue is due to the strut angle which is mostly just chassis dependent not subframe, so you should be fine.
__________________
S12 || KN13 || S13 || B16 |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|