The search for the perfect wideband

[Loomis112]

I have searched the interballs far and wide I have come to two conclusions

Dsm owners love AEM products and everyone else likes the Innovate LC-1's


I just want accurate on demand AFR readings whats the best in Zilvia's opinioun??

[hobbs]

I prefer the MTX-L from innovate, considerably faster readings than an AEM UEGO.

[ultimateirving]

Lc1 is quick response On The digital gauge. Had it 4 years with two new sensors over the time.

[aga]

innovate's controllers tend to get damaged. we ve had 3 go bad.

AEM is good for those who want "just" a wideband.

for more advanced features, i love the zeitronix. as for accuracy, all the widebands are preety much the same... 0.1 AFR accuracy. you dont need anything more accurate.

[Loomis112]

innovate's controllers tend to get damaged. we ve had 3 go bad.

AEM is good for those who want "just" a wideband.

for more advanced features, i love the zeitronix. as for accuracy, all the widebands are preety much the same... 0.1 AFR accuracy. you dont need anything more accurate.

I'm not looking for data logging and all that jazz I just wanna see AFR's.


You say AEM?

[aga]

for a simple and effective gauge, yes, aem.

[Marco,s14..]

I have aem uego.
Had it on my turbo 5.0 and now i have in my s14 , and still working pretty good.

[angel mkiv]

I have the aem failsafe and love it! Does what it should and don't have issues with it.Cool because it's a boost gauge and wideband together and can have it set up so that if your car ever runs to lean it will drop boost or retard timing.

[AS240]

I've had an aem uego and an innovate mtx-l. I prefer the mtx-l because of the considerably faster readings, and the fact that I can calibrate it myself. I just don't trust the "auto-calibrating" of the aem.