Which do you like better? - Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

BlueSix · 10-13-2001, 03:16 PM

<img src="http://www.wickednet.org/~bluesix/240/zeditcompare.jpg">

http://www.wickednet.org/~bluesix/240/zeditcompare.jpg

Which do you prefer, the one on top or the one on the bottom? I like the one on the bottom even though I screwed up the taillight.  What do you guys think?

dave2u · 10-13-2001, 03:23 PM

I like the top one. Bottom ones nice but too small. Top ones got a bit more beef about it.

*LanceS13* · 10-13-2001, 03:24 PM

Looks like a big CRX IMHO.  I like the first one better...it's sleeker.

*ca18guy* · 10-13-2001, 03:51 PM

If you want to change something on the new Z, change the front grill or the shape of headlights (try to put 300zx headlights on it <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'> ) The lines of the car look fine. No need to make it look like a CRX.

10-13-2001, 03:59 PM

ok ok ok info......... i heard they have a production tt coming out too, 335 horsepower, 289 on the middle of the line and a 3.0 with 197, anyone else heard this??

S13Grl · 10-13-2001, 04:05 PM

*ca18guy* · 10-13-2001, 05:34 PM

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from nismos14 on 3:59 pm on Oct. 13, 2001
ok ok ok info......... i heard they have a production tt coming out too, 335 horsepower, 289 on the middle of the line and a 3.0 with 197, anyone else heard this??
</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>

Nismo14 nobody knows, the info you said sounds like the info from a british website that said those figures. I would'nt count on those figures. A TT version would make alot more then 335 HP. The probable HP estimate is one version of the engine that makes 280 to 300 HP, and maybe a direct injection model that makes alittle more horse power after a year or two. Of course they could surprise everyone with a TT, the last 300zx was't expected to be a TT, but they don't want the new Z to get to expensive.

10-13-2001, 05:37 PM

i saw in a mag that the production version in Brit was gonna be 335 hp tt and 289 na, and 197 on a 3.0, and the old tt went frm 222 na to only 300 thats not a big increase either

10-13-2001, 05:48 PM

oh i like being on  the top let the lady relax and i'll do all the work  :biggrin: uh.... yah the top car uh huh :o

BlankFlip · 10-13-2001, 06:04 PM

nice job, but i like the top version better, just "flows" better <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'>

*ca18guy* · 10-13-2001, 06:45 PM

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from nismos14 on 5:37 pm on Oct. 13, 2001
i saw in a mag that the production version in Brit was gonna be 335 hp tt and 289 na, and 197 on a 3.0, and the old tt went frm 222 na to only 300 thats not a big increase either
</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>

The 3.0L 300zx's TT version has a 78 HP increase, but the 3.5L 350z gets TT's and only gains 46 HP ?  I'm just saying it sounds like more spam info about the 350z. Besides the fact that it go's against everything Nissan has said and all major magazines.

misnomer · 10-13-2001, 09:15 PM

top, the bottom looks a little too. . . what's the world for it. . . "Ford Focus"

I gotta agree whith what whomever said about the grille. Smoth and round car with a #### black rectangular grille, ugly!!!

240sxtreme · 10-14-2001, 02:18 PM

I thought this was gonna be an entirely different question!  <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'>   top, all the way...the bottom's taillights are in the wrong place....I' mean, above the wheel???

personally, I think they need to redo the taillights completely.

Tuck&Poke · 10-14-2001, 02:34 PM

335!!uh no.  it more like 250 i know it could make more but theyre trying to keep the price down so its affordable (well relativley affordable.  sorry guys i expected more too.

*ca18guy* · 10-14-2001, 02:44 PM

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from minime686 on 2:34 pm on Oct. 14, 2001
335!!uh no. it more like 250 i know it could make more but theyre trying to keep the price down so its affordable (well relativley affordable. sorry guys i expected more too.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>

Uh no!!!  the maxima makes 255 HP out of it's VQ35DE, the Z won't have less HP then the Maxima. The exact quote from the nissan site is "3.5-liter 24-valve DOHC V6 engine rated at 260-plus horsepower" Notice the plus, "rumors" have the HP number more around the 280-300 HP mark. But nobody knows til Nissan tells us.

Chokudori · 10-14-2001, 04:28 PM

Definitly the top

Zexel · 10-14-2001, 04:41 PM

vancouvers14 · 10-15-2001, 11:30 AM

i like the bottom, but there isnt enough overhang for it to be legal

TRM02 · 10-15-2001, 02:02 PM

I like the TOP one.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

10-13-2001, 03:16 PM	#1
BlueSix Zilvia Member Join Date: Sep 2001 Posts: 173 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	<img src="http://www.wickednet.org/~bluesix/240/zeditcompare.jpg"> http://www.wickednet.org/~bluesix/240/zeditcompare.jpg Which do you prefer, the one on top or the one on the bottom? I like the one on the bottom even though I screwed up the taillight.  What do you guys think?

10-13-2001, 03:23 PM	#2
dave2u Zilvia Junkie Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: uk Age: 50 Posts: 499 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	I like the top one. Bottom ones nice but too small. Top ones got a bit more beef about it.

10-13-2001, 03:24 PM	#3
LanceS13 AutoX Junkie Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: MS Age: 39 Posts: 2,044 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	Looks like a big CRX IMHO.  I like the first one better...it's sleeker.

10-13-2001, 03:51 PM	#4
ca18guy Premium Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Clearwater FL Age: 39 Posts: 3,226 Trader Rating: (0) Rides Gallery: ca18guy Feedback Score: 0 reviews	If you want to change something on the new Z, change the front grill or the shape of headlights (try to put 300zx headlights on it <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'> ) The lines of the car look fine. No need to make it look like a CRX.

10-13-2001, 03:59 PM	#5
Guest Posts: n/a	ok ok ok info......... i heard they have a production tt coming out too, 335 horsepower, 289 on the middle of the line and a 3.0 with 197, anyone else heard this??

10-13-2001, 04:05 PM	#6
S13Grl Married to the Mob Join Date: Dec 2000 Age: 40 Posts: 3,670 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	Top

10-13-2001, 05:34 PM	#7
ca18guy Premium Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Clearwater FL Age: 39 Posts: 3,226 Trader Rating: (0) Rides Gallery: ca18guy Feedback Score: 0 reviews	</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from nismos14 on 3:59 pm on Oct. 13, 2001 ok ok ok info......... i heard they have a production tt coming out too, 335 horsepower, 289 on the middle of the line and a 3.0 with 197, anyone else heard this?? </td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'> Nismo14 nobody knows, the info you said sounds like the info from a british website that said those figures. I would'nt count on those figures. A TT version would make alot more then 335 HP. The probable HP estimate is one version of the engine that makes 280 to 300 HP, and maybe a direct injection model that makes alittle more horse power after a year or two. Of course they could surprise everyone with a TT, the last 300zx was't expected to be a TT, but they don't want the new Z to get to expensive.

10-13-2001, 05:37 PM	#8
Guest Posts: n/a	i saw in a mag that the production version in Brit was gonna be 335 hp tt and 289 na, and 197 on a 3.0, and the old tt went frm 222 na to only 300 thats not a big increase either

10-13-2001, 05:48 PM	#9
Guest Posts: n/a	oh i like being on  the top let the lady relax and i'll do all the work  :biggrin: uh.... yah the top car uh huh :o

10-13-2001, 06:04 PM	#10
BlankFlip Nissanaholic! Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: The Future Posts: 1,627 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	nice job, but i like the top version better, just "flows" better <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'>

10-13-2001, 06:45 PM	#11
ca18guy Premium Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Clearwater FL Age: 39 Posts: 3,226 Trader Rating: (0) Rides Gallery: ca18guy Feedback Score: 0 reviews	</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from nismos14 on 5:37 pm on Oct. 13, 2001 i saw in a mag that the production version in Brit was gonna be 335 hp tt and 289 na, and 197 on a 3.0, and the old tt went frm 222 na to only 300 thats not a big increase either </td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'> The 3.0L 300zx's TT version has a 78 HP increase, but the 3.5L 350z gets TT's and only gains 46 HP ?  I'm just saying it sounds like more spam info about the 350z. Besides the fact that it go's against everything Nissan has said and all major magazines.

10-13-2001, 09:15 PM	#12
misnomer Nissanaholic! Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Nevada Posts: 2,293 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	top, the bottom looks a little too. . . what's the world for it. . . "Ford Focus" I gotta agree whith what whomever said about the grille. Smoth and round car with a #### black rectangular grille, ugly!!!

10-14-2001, 02:18 PM	#13
240sxtreme Zilvia Junkie Join Date: Oct 2001 Location: Portland, OR Age: 44 Posts: 386 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	I thought this was gonna be an entirely different question!  <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'>   top, all the way...the bottom's taillights are in the wrong place....I' mean, above the wheel??? personally, I think they need to redo the taillights completely.

10-14-2001, 02:34 PM	#14
Tuck&Poke Zilvia FREAK! Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: MIA Age: 35 Posts: 1,046 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	335!!uh no.  it more like 250 i know it could make more but theyre trying to keep the price down so its affordable (well relativley affordable.  sorry guys i expected more too.

10-14-2001, 02:44 PM	#15
ca18guy Premium Member Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Clearwater FL Age: 39 Posts: 3,226 Trader Rating: (0) Rides Gallery: ca18guy Feedback Score: 0 reviews	</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from minime686 on 2:34 pm on Oct. 14, 2001 335!!uh no. it more like 250 i know it could make more but theyre trying to keep the price down so its affordable (well relativley affordable. sorry guys i expected more too.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'> Uh no!!!  the maxima makes 255 HP out of it's VQ35DE, the Z won't have less HP then the Maxima. The exact quote from the nissan site is "3.5-liter 24-valve DOHC V6 engine rated at 260-plus horsepower" Notice the plus, "rumors" have the HP number more around the 280-300 HP mark. But nobody knows til Nissan tells us.

10-14-2001, 04:28 PM	#16
Chokudori Zilvia Member Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Colorado Posts: 249 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	Definitly the top

10-14-2001, 04:41 PM	#17
Zexel Zilvia Member Join Date: Jun 2001 Posts: 262 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	top

10-15-2001, 11:30 AM	#18
vancouvers14 Zilvia Addict Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 868 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	i like the bottom, but there isnt enough overhang for it to be legal

10-15-2001, 02:02 PM	#19
TRM02 Zilvia Member Join Date: Oct 2001 Posts: 166 Trader Rating: (0) Feedback Score: 0 reviews	I like the TOP one.