RalliartRsX

So honestly, how much of the hearing did you actually watch vs lifting your talking point directly from fox news or similar? Fox and ultra right wing sources are the only ones reporting as such......

S14rebuild

Been watching it all. Multi news outlets

Dems are grabbing at straws here....

lewisfk

^^ No way you could off!! I listened via NPR radio all day at work and your points are missing the mark! Mrs. Hill destroyed every talking point the Republicans had with facts, email, and dates backing up everything. The State Department witness did a better job than the Dems could off. The story line will shift to, Yes the POTUS asked for quid pro quo, but that is not impeachable.

RalliartRsX

So how did you come to the conclusion considering Hill had very strong testimony and Sondland produced actual tangible information in the form of Text messages, etc contrary to what you stated above??

Several folks had first hand exposure to the actual phone call. How would you explain that as well??

RalliartRsX

Also are you saying Vindman, as long term veteran, is not a viable witness??

I am struggling to see how you came to this conclusion considering the very bi-partisan nature of the folks who did testify and included tangible evidence.
Vidnman is valuable testimony I am not sure there is anyone as bi-partisan as Vidnmand with so many years of service who I would go against. And this is just one example

gbaby2089

nopenopenope

S14rebuild

Ya, this guy 1000% correct.

exitspeed

Whoa, another “I’m right and you’re wrong post”. Shocking.


I’m waiting to see how the whole thing shakes out honestly. Recent polls are showing people are over this thing and in one week went from more people thinking he should be impeached to more people thinking he should not. This could back fire of the Democrats in a big way. Russia 2.0. There were “facts” then too.

__________________
What I do for a living...www.mhrussell.com

Future240

My take on the impeachment is both sides are convinced they are right. I have not been able to watch it for myself so I don’t have an opinion.

All left news sources are reporting it’s a win for dems
All right sources are reporting it’s a loss for dems.

My only thoughts are the senate is republicans controlled. It would be career suicide as a republican to vote to impeach him. Not going to happen. If it’s s closed door vote you bet your asses any dissenters would get “leaked” to the public.

__________________

gbaby2089

Yes, impeachment has killed so many dems as Dem candidates have won traditional GOP seats across the south

lewisfk

The best thing in my opinion is to download the NPR app on your phone or listen driving int and coming home from work. I loved the back and forth with Rep Nunes and Mrs. Hill, she gave him the business for a solid 20 minutes.

S14rebuild

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...s-out.amp.html


NOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST


Lets go!!!!!!!!! TRUMP 2020

lewisfk

^^
Pamela will destroy Trump, and don't forget she will get her chance in the impeachment trial!

exitspeed

God Pamala Anderson was hot.

Not sure what she has to do with any of this though.

__________________
What I do for a living...www.mhrussell.com

S14rebuild

Thats as funny as this impeachment trial is...jokes

gbaby2089

nopenopenope

lewisfk

^^ Her record as a prosecutor is pretty damn good compared to others. The reason her record gets questioned is over the Police Officer who was murdered and the individual was not sentenced to death but life in prison. The widow of the slain officer and their family wanted the death penalty, Kamala ," said no." Kamala failed to meet with the family to discuss this matter. Kamala has a history of being cold, but not corrupt like Hilary.

I'm currently listening to NPR Broadcast, and all the 3 out 4 scholars agree the POTUS should be impeached.

RalliartRsX

Kamala would not wipe the floor with trump. It is not about record in this election, it is simply about optics, and Kamala would easy lose out on character assassination by gop.

In addition, she has been chameleon like on several topics. Dropped the ball heavily (in my eyes during a NPR interview) in immigration and overall, did not have the proper support staff to push her across the goal line. She didn't bother to campaign in Iowa and basically lost all her (donor) support. Also, the black vote was not guaranteed (which is why she chose to campaign in South and North Carolina as opposed to Iowa) and she just over extended herself and underestimated the importance of key checkpoints along the way.

Being a president is simply not about having a good record (which is checkered). There are several more factors which she simply did not posses or simply made the wrong moves.

^ And no. The reason her past was checkered was not because of that event. She pushed for proper rehabilitation of prisoners while also pushing for longer more stringent prison sentences for example.

lewisfk

^^ I referring to a debate and in a political setting. She was actually in Iowa and had scheduled events until her staffer wrote a op-ed.

S14rebuild

Does it matter anymore? Shes out, truth always comes out. Our president takes down another bully and liar

RalliartRsX

HRC whipped the floor with trump during the debates yet here we are

Also, Harris only showed up to Iowa AFTER the fact. She was already deep in the Carolinas prior to this ......well pass tf here Iowa sell by date.....and part of the reason why she is out. However, I put this one squarely on her team of strategist.

Do I agree with iowa being so important? No. However this is what we are working with.

Lest we forget, HRC negated to campaign in several states which won trump the electoral college....

exitspeed

In you opinion.

Allow me to correct you. You mean won Trump the presidency. Didn’t none of y’all have a got damn issue with the electoral college until it wasn’t what you wanted.

Sore fucking loser ass.

__________________
What I do for a living...www.mhrussell.com

RalliartRsX

Lol. Triggered much?

I have always had an issue with the electoral college as it allowed large swats of land to actually function as a vote. The issue is how do you balance farm owners with densely populated metropolitan areas. Every vote should be counted equally and allows this sham of an idea that one must campaign for 90% of the time in office vs actually doing your job that the folks elected you to do.

But again, please make more blanket ignorant statements as you normally do.

trump won the electoral college. Deal with it and stop being a little snow flake in hell when people disagree with your stance. Jeesss. It's almost as if you are about to have a freacking aneurism anyone as much as says trump had a bad hair day knowing full well dude wears a fucking 1990s chia pep on his head...….


P.S You dont win a football game scoring 3+ million points less than your opponent

S14rebuild

This is truth!

exitspeed

Man you are just obnoxious.

__________________
What I do for a living...www.mhrussell.com

gbaby2089

I love alt-right extremists telling Democrats who should represent their party.

In other news: There are many things galling about the Trump cuts to SNAP, but perhaps most galling is the fact the savings amount to 1/14th (!) of the annual cost of the Trump direct welfare payments to agribusiness to make up for his trade war.

Welfare for the wealthy versus trying to keep poor people food secure.

exitspeed

Rollins: Impeachment sham -- I've served 4 presidents and never seen such naked, self-serving partisanship
Ed Rollins By Ed Rollins | Fox News

“President Trump’s scheme subverted U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and undermined our national security.”

So reads the Democrat’s charade of an impeachment “report,” suggesting President Trump’s attempts to expose corruption in Ukraine were somehow politically motivated. The report’s author, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., went on to describe the president as “unbound” and “unaccountable”—because Schiff is a model of even-keeled temperament. He and other Democrats formally adopted the report a party-line vote, leading up to today’s impeachment hearing in the House Judiciary Committee.

Don’t be fooled: Schiff’s impeachment charade is exactly that, and it’s incompatible with the long and esteemed history of the United States Congress.

Anti-Trump Democrats have essentially hijacked one of the three branches of federal government by consuming Congress with a bogus impeachment process, which has only deepened our divisions while grinding government to a halt.

This is unprecedented. I have served four U.S. presidents, including two tours at the highest rank of White House staff as Assistant to the President.

I have also advised six different presidential campaigns, so I’ve lived and breathed politics for decades.

As chairman of Great America PAC, I worked hard to help elect President Trump, so I understand just how determined the Left is to not only undermine his agenda, but ultimately remove him from office.

I have never seen such naked, self-serving partisanship. Since Inauguration Day, impeachment has been the left’s primary agenda.

Mere weeks after his election, Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., pressured President Trump to divest business assets that could pose a conflict of interest, supporting legislation would make violations of federal conflict-of-interest rules “a high crime or misdemeanor under the impeachment clause of the U.S. Constitution.”

Three years later, that same agenda has resulted in the impeachment “hearings” we see today. It’s a farce.

After the Mueller report predictably exonerated President Trump earlier this year, Schiff embraced a whistleblower whose claims would purportedly lay the foundation for impeachment. Within months, however, a supposed truth-teller was exposed as a registered Democrat held over from the Obama White House. This was a Democrat who had previously worked with former Vice President Joe Biden.

According to one National Security Council official, the whistleblower was “accused of working against Trump and leaking against Trump.” That same whistleblower reportedly worked with a Democratic National Committee operative, Alexandra Chalupa, who conducted opposition research on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election. He even invited her into the White House for meetings.

In the process, the whistleblower even sought out Schiff for “guidance.” That’s right: The whistleblower, a Democrat, worked with the ringleader of impeachment to remove a sitting president from office. And now we are to believe the impeachment process is “nonpartisan”.

Making matters worse, Schiff repeatedly lied about his contact with the whistleblower. In an MSNBC interview, Schiff infamously claimed, “We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.” It’s a claim so egregious that even The Washington Post and PolitiFact—which are anything but pro-Trump—accused Schiff of lying to the American people.

The charade goes on. Schiff recently scrambled to stop the whistleblower from being named, while finding time to accuse President Trump of acting “for his own personal, political gain”—again, because Schiff is a model of nonpartisanship. Even as Republicans attempt to speak with the whistleblower, Democrats put up roadblocks at every turn.

David Bossie: Judiciary Committee continues impeachment witch hunt – But Trump did nothing wrong on Ukraine
Deroy Murdock: Impeaching Trump will hurt Democrats more than him
Harry Kazianis: NATO should die if allies won’t increase defense spending as Trump wants
As Rep. Kevin McCarthy recently explained, “[Schiff’s] focus—in his own words—is to send the president ‘back to the golden throne he came from.’”

Such partisanship is not only antithetical to our democracy, but it also sets a dangerous precedent for future dealings between a sitting president and the opposition party. If the Democrats can pursue impeachment now—when there are virtually no grounds to so—are we to expect an impeachment inquiry every four years?

How can Republicans trust any Democrat, when the Democratic Party has been hell-bent on impeachment since 2016? Imagine if Republicans had launched a bogus impeachment inquiry against President Obama, solely on the grounds of him being a Democrat.

In lieu of trust, what Republicans can do is mobilize. Based on recent polling, Republicans (and other Americans) are determined to look past Schiff’s impeachment charade and join together in support of President Trump.

The Democrats may have “impeachment,” but President Trump has a booming economy and the safest, most secure America in recent memory. I’ll take the latter, and so should you.

__________________
What I do for a living...www.mhrussell.com

gbaby2089

nopenopenope

RalliartRsX

Yep. Triggered as fuck Hahahahah!

exitspeed

Please stop with the “I know you are but what am I”.

Also, during an “impeachment “.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

__________________
What I do for a living...www.mhrussell.com