![]() |
|
|||||||
| Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Tech Talk Technical Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
Zilvia Junkie
![]() |
One hose to the front facing T on the valve cover and the other hose to the barb on the intake tube.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 36
Posts: 4,590
Trader Rating: (53)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 53 reviews
|
The moment you realize that the baffles in the S13 suck shit and always cause oil to blow out of the t-fitting. Hence the reason people install catch cans or have someone weld them a hybrid S13/S14 valve cover.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
The moment you realize you dont know wtf you talking about ![]() Kingtalon, first time I hear about this restricter. Do you have any pics of it? Or where to buy it? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Age: 36
Posts: 4,590
Trader Rating: (53)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 53 reviews
|
Quote:
I'm guessing that separator piece is the OEM restrictor???
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Nissanaholic!
![]() Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: France - Toulouse
Age: 41
Posts: 1,851
Trader Rating: (0)
![]() Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
The thread is already some months old, so i doubt you will get an answer. It does not look like he is running a maf though.
Which allows me to answer this: Open your valve cover, see for yourself, there are baffling plates before the oil vapor pickups, which act the same as ... you got it, *working* oil catch tanks (not the ebay stuff that once vented to atmosphere just catch the water vapor that condenses during the night) |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SWFL
Age: 47
Posts: 3,318
Trader Rating: (3)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 3 reviews
|
The oem restrictor is a brass fitting inside the hose. If, you used the oem hoses with the separator then, yes you have the restictor! The restrictor can be taken out and put into a replacement hose.
__________________
![]() LoverTechnologies "Half Broken Things!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Zilvia Addict
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Nissanaholic!
![]() |
Yes, there's a restrictor on the turbo inlet
U see that fitting in there? You see how small the hole in the center is? Yeah... And yes, sr's arent the only ones that have baffles underneath their valve covers, many other engines have that too. If Im not mistaken ka have something very similar near the front covers, no? But the point is, you want to improve that. The more filtered the crankcase vapors going back into your intake without adding too much restriction, the better, no? That's why you want to choose the right catch can, not just a hollow ebay can that wont "catch" a thing, unless you're planning on modifying it. This is what I went with: |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Post Whore!
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 38
Posts: 4,649
Trader Rating: (17)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 17 reviews
|
Quote:
Which brings me to catch cans. Catch cans are (temporary) band-aids that help us cover up problems with oil passing a factory baffle, not fix them. A catch can can also be a safety net in the event of catastrophic failure (may protect the turbo or plumbing), or a cosmetic part just for looks. Keep in mind there are two sides to an sr20det valve cover; if oil is passing the baffle on the exhaust side, it may also be passing on the intake side at the pcv valve. A catch can on the exhaust side will only catch the oil flow problem on that one side. Besides all of that, there is still a problem with the additional crankcase volume a catch-can adds to the engine. Each hose contains additional air molecules that need to be moved in order to affect a pressure drop (PCV action) therefore diminishing the action of PCV and making it less effective. Therefore, it is best to run an engine (every engine) with MINIMAL crankcase volume (i.e. NO catch cans or other external devices which add volume to the crank case) in order to maximize the benefit of the PCV system. Great pic of the restrictor, lets discuss what it does. The PCV valve on the valve cover connects to the intake manifold where intake pressure drives PCV action during part throttle/cruise/idle. The other side of the valve cover connects to the inlet tube, which is connected through the air filter to the atmosphere. So if we remove the air filter, you now have a crankcase which is directly connected to the atmosphere. That means that for every molecule of air the PCV valve (intake manifold side) passes to the combustion chamber, it will be quickly replaced by an atmospheric molecule and the net pressure will remain atmospheric (NO pressure drop, NO pcv action). Thus, there are two major points of restriction between the intake side PCV valve and the atmosphere to solve this issue. The first one is the air filter. As the air filter becomes clogged (or simply OEM quality) there is some net drop in pressure on the turbo side of the filter. This helps lower the pressure in the inlet tube, increasing PCV action (by providing pressure below atmospheric). You might be saying, "what if my air filter is not restrictive at all? Sometimes they are very high quality" And this brings us to the existence of the second restrictor in the picture above. This fitting limits the flow of atmospheric molecules which can move into the crank case, as the PCV valve on the intake side is removing them, allowing the pressure in the crank case to drop below atmospheric until reaching equilibrium. Without this restrictor (and/or appropriate air filter) the crankcase pressure would never be driven below atmospheric, since atmospheric molecules could easily diffuse into the crankcase (if there were no restriction). As engines change, so must their PCV systems. A PCV system is part of the oil system and therefore a top priority, it should be the highest concern. If I remove the restrictor, I need to replace it with something similar or better, such as an appropriately sized, angled venturi style fitting, which may improve PCV action during boost (where a typical restrictor may lower/limit pcv action during boost). I also want to point out that engine oil seals, such as front main, rear main, valve cover, oil pump/pan, head gasket, are all affected by PCV action. high crank case pressures due to bad PCV valve, bad piston rings, or poorly implemented PCV plumbing, results with oil being pushed out of those seals, and if pressure climbs high enough, oil seal failure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Premium Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North Korea
Posts: 14,576
Trader Rating: (27)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Feedback Score: 27 reviews
|
Read up, kiddo. #/f/showthread.php?t...se+ventilation
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|