|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Off Topic Chat All non related chat goes here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-29-2012, 08:09 PM | #121 | ||
R.I.P. Aya, always love
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Los Feliz/Hollywood
Posts: 18,558
Trader Rating: (215)
Feedback Score: 215 reviews
|
Quote:
Now for you to speculate they would keep on increasing the pricing trend is purely speculative. I would hazard to say it will quite possibly be a reversal. Reason being will the 370 is great from an engineering and handling perspective it has not sold nearly as well as the 350. Do not think Nissan does not take note of these things. Also the BRZ is starting at like 26k . So they really could steal some thunder by downsizing a bit and dropping the price a bit. Who knows this is all theorizing. lol Quote:
There is no way Nissan is doing away with V6's they get great results out of them and they use them all over the product line. I would hazard to say the VQ series engines are the most used engine in Nissan engine product line up. On the scaled down Z front they could easily do a 250Z with a VQ25HR.
__________________
"Having a lot of tracks on a song is like putting stickers on a car to get more horsepower" New Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uebV1OnbRsw Buy my mounts! http://zilvia.net/f/sale-items/51531...ns-mounts.html http://zilvia.net/f/tech-talk/317539...e-mouts-6.html |
||
Sponsored Links |
05-29-2012, 08:36 PM | #122 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
While the BRZ may be fun, lets not forget it's still a solid notch down below the 370Z, just like the 370Z is still a rung below a 'Vette. Lets also not forget about the other V8s out there - the old SOHC 4.6 was 225-260hp depending on the year, when the Z came out with 287hp that was Most V6s today are +300hp anymore, V8's are in the 400's and Turbo-4's are still 200-300hp, not much more then they where at the start of the 90's. Weight, simplicity and packaging also benefits the V6 engines as well. Sure it sucks that you can't just turn up the boost or swap turbos, but few consumers do that anyways. Honestly, the Z needs to worry about moving up market, not down market. A Twin-Turbo version in the 40's that can compete with the 'Vette in performance and Caymen in quality is what we really need. The FBRZS is just a Miata with better styling and marketing. It's not exactly novel. |
|
05-30-2012, 11:00 AM | #123 | |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: earth
Age: 59
Posts: 1,138
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Did I say anything about power? No, they have gone the way of the dodo because of emissions and gas milage. With obd3 on the horizon and the emissions standards it will bring for new cars I highly doubt the the next z will be an n/a v6. If anything maybe a smaller displacement turbo vq could be coming down the line. It's true that the new forced induction 4's are not putting out that much more power then what they used to but the response and torque curve that they can achieve now is pretty incredible.I don't think stuffing a 4 cylinder in a z and trying to make it compete with the brz or other sub 30k sports cars is the answer here. For the next Z they should develop a chassis that can be used for multiple platforms like volkswagen is doing so that they can build multiple cars on one platform without all the extra r and d cost. |
|
05-30-2012, 12:20 PM | #124 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
also the VQ puts out late 90's V8 power, but now everyone makes V8's with 400+hp, not 300hp. |
|
05-30-2012, 04:40 PM | #125 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
So what? Its still more powerful then the "most powerful" Turbo-4s on the market and the car performs admirably. A $52,000 Cayman makes 265hp. Where is the outrage? A BRZ that costs $26,000 is only making 200hp - nearly 100hp less then cars that cost $3,000 less. |
|
05-30-2012, 04:54 PM | #126 | ||
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
Do you even have the slightest clue on the packaging and material costs of incorporating a turbo into a production car? I suspect if anything, Nissan is already developing a VQ-series replacement, something cheaper to build, with more displacement options and a larger utilization of polymer technologies. The Z does not produce enough sales to warrant its own unique chassis and power-train development. It will continue to hare chassis, engines and parts with Nissan's luxury and car lines. Quote:
Where have you been for the last 2012 years? The Z has been riding the same chassis as the G-series since the 350Z came out, it also uses the same damn motor and running gear. Volkswagen is the last person Nissan should be copying. Hell Volkswagen has not had a "sports car" since the early 90's and what a failure the Corrado was. |
||
05-30-2012, 05:12 PM | #127 |
Post Whore!
|
Watch out class, this is the future of V6 engine design.
300hp, VVT, E85 and 87 Octane, no PVC system, 260ft ft/tq at 4,500rpm Yes kids, the exhaust manifolds are integrated into the heads. This is a reduction of cost, parts and weight. |
05-31-2012, 04:50 AM | #131 | |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: earth
Age: 59
Posts: 1,138
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Are you illiterate? I never said all 6 cylinders, I said most n/a high performance 6 cylinders will be going to the way side. Turbochargers have become much much cheaper then what they used to be when they were reserved only for limited production sports cars. I didn't not say the Z should have its own unique chassis, if you had read what I posted I said they should make a chassis which many cars could be based off of like what volks wagen is doing (this includes porsche) so they can lengthen and widen as well as shorten a narrow it so it may be used in a wide range of cars, hence making a small sports car more feasible. I was not just more or less talking about VAG not just volkswagen, this includes porsche. |
|
05-31-2012, 07:35 AM | #132 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
i would never buy a Porsche so i dont really care about a Cayman. just remember our 240's cost almost 26k back in 1998(probably over 30K with in todays market). |
|
06-03-2012, 07:25 PM | #133 |
Post Whore!
|
Saw a group of BRZ's and FR-S's parked together in front of a restaurant.
In person, both cars look the same. I thought it funny that the owners are having meets already. |
06-03-2012, 10:55 PM | #136 | |
Zilvia Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Much cooler part of Az
Age: 38
Posts: 220
Trader Rating: (1)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Quote:
A 240sx would cost about 26-30k in today's dollars. And remember, that is for the same KA, 140hp, 5spd car some people think is worth 12k stock...today.... Back on topic, the reason I like these cars is because of what I was wanting to do with my 240sx. I wanted to rebuild the engine, supercharge it and get about 200hp...but now, I can get that without the headache with more features. All I need to do is wait until they come on the used market or wait until there are some discounts. The 240...now might get a V8...
__________________
blah blah blah |
|
06-04-2012, 02:06 AM | #137 | ||
R.I.P. Aya, always love
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Los Feliz/Hollywood
Posts: 18,558
Trader Rating: (215)
Feedback Score: 215 reviews
|
Quote:
I think people are losing sight in this discussion. Nissan Already has a car that competes with the Vette and the 911 . The GTR. Honestly I don't think Nissan has ever looked at Z's as Corvette Competitors. They have always positioned them against Porsche's and that goes straight back to the 70's with the 240Z. I have already stated the fact that in the U.S. the Z is and always will be a six cylinder car. I also do not think given current sales numbers they want to try and push it upstream price wise. Nissan already has their top end car with the GTR, The Infiniti G series lands inbetween the Z and GTR last thing they would want to do would be move it upstream and have it competing directly with the G series in pricing. Add to the fact that its already been noted in Automotive publications that Nissan has been thinking and talking about downsizing the Z. Quote:
You really like to extrapolate as well. Seriously dude for all intensive purposes a 335HP V6 is in V8 HP territory period. If you study V6's in the 90's they were lucky to get 300HP with Turbo's. You are really just trying to argue semantics here. Plus we are getting way off the main topic is the BRZ a 240sx successor.
__________________
"Having a lot of tracks on a song is like putting stickers on a car to get more horsepower" New Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uebV1OnbRsw Buy my mounts! http://zilvia.net/f/sale-items/51531...ns-mounts.html http://zilvia.net/f/tech-talk/317539...e-mouts-6.html |
||
06-04-2012, 02:51 AM | #138 |
Post Whore!
|
I don't consider more weight and more power more upmarket. That's like paying more money for more power and weight. Keep it light and simple hence FR-S/BR-Z > 370z. Or Lower weight and higher power to weight ratio > more weight with the same power to weight ratio. If you want prestige buy a high end car.
|
06-04-2012, 02:51 AM | #139 | |||
Zilvia Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Age: 36
Posts: 969
Trader Rating: (12)
Feedback Score: 12 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
However, I don't not want a 240sx successor. I really do not want a RWD 2.5L N/A from Altima's engine. I want my turbo-4 silvia successor. Quote:
Whether the 370z doesn't seem to be an upgrade to you, to me, any sports car you get under $35000 is considered affordable (I got my 40th for 33k OTD). At least Nissan took the risk and balls to continue making a "sport car" line when Toyota was busy making hybrids. As much as I can't see myself trading my Z for a BR-Z, I really do hope it does really well because the current trend of car sales for "sporty cars" under the 35k range since 1995 is pretty scarily declining. I also believe this is why there was so much marketing hype back then for Hyundai Genesis and now with the FR-S, especially the tuner scene. To me, I would think a failure on the FRS/BRZ would also mean the end for Nissan's "silvia" and "z" line. |
|||
06-05-2012, 10:55 AM | #140 |
Post Whore!
|
|
06-05-2012, 10:59 AM | #141 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
Average car sold in the US is close to $31,000 anymore. Inflation is a bitch. Really a Z is only a few grand more then a V6 Camry. |
|
06-05-2012, 12:04 PM | #142 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix AZ
Age: 36
Posts: 10,287
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
the BRZ is sold out? did they make way less BRZ's than FRS's? because the Toyota dealership up the street has quite a few just sitting around.
__________________
|
06-05-2012, 01:01 PM | #143 | |
Guild of Skullduggerous Intent
|
Quote:
Most if not all have been claimed by pre-orders. |
|
06-05-2012, 02:36 PM | #144 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
the VQ puts out V6 numbers for today. Ford, Chevy, Hyundai, Dodge, Chrysler and Nissan all make 400+hp V8's and they all make 300hp V6's. the VQ is an Average V6. |
|
06-05-2012, 03:57 PM | #145 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 7,666
Trader Rating: (63)
Feedback Score: 63 reviews
|
Quote:
I do not feel special for VQ much. Sure it is great engine but everybody else has same or better performance in very similar platform. Too bad mustangs dont come with EcoBoost V6. I'd be more interested than 5.0 V8 |
|
06-05-2012, 06:29 PM | #146 |
Zilvia Addict
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Garden Grove, CA
Age: 36
Posts: 969
Trader Rating: (12)
Feedback Score: 12 reviews
|
I also concur about the VQ as well considering the only benefit you get is a wider powerband with extra 800RPM. With extra $12k, I'd take the Boss Mustang with its V8 hitting 8000RPM range and suspension that put the Nismo 370z to shame.
|
06-05-2012, 09:18 PM | #150 |
Nissanaholic!
|
jukes look like dog poop imho, dont care how fast theyre making them. Wish i could afford a new car, then i would take these cars into consideration, unfortunately not until another few years..
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|