|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
LOUD NOISES A place for political mudslinging, Pro/Anti legalization, gay marriage debate, Gun control rants, etc. If it's political, controversial, or hotly debated, it goes here. No regular Off-Topic stuff allowed. READ THE RULES BEFORE POSTING! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
06-29-2012, 05:30 PM | #1 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Phoenix AZ
Age: 36
Posts: 10,287
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
does the US defense budget make sense to you?
we spent over $700 billion in 2011 on defense/wars/so on. China, the big red country we're supposed to fear, spent about $150 billion. they have around four times our population, who, yes, probably don't live as well as most of us. but seriously, $700 billion? to fight for other countries' freedom, democracy, whatever bullshit they feed us? does it make sense to be spending so much on foreign wars when we have so many problems at home? WHY are we spending such a large amount of money overseas?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...y_expenditures please tell me why i'm a stupid idealistic liberal, but do it like i'm five. thanks.
__________________
|
Sponsored Links |
06-29-2012, 06:10 PM | #2 |
Zilvia Member
|
On a serious note, the US is out of hand with spending money out of country, wether it be through the defense budget or any other budget they want to apply it to. We would be spending the money to help other countries out ether way. sectioning it to the defense budget is the easiest way to justify the spending with the recent war and because of the troops we still have there. if they wanted too, they would fund it through another part, ether way, its getting spent. solution? |
06-29-2012, 06:10 PM | #3 |
Man w/ CTSV & a Car Seat
|
If it makes you feel better, its going down due to all the budget cuts.
Here's a breakdown of where most of that money goes: Operations and maintenance $283.3 billion +4.2% Military Personnel $154.2 billion +5.0% Procurement $140.1 billion −1.8% R&D, Testing & Evaluation $79.1 billion +1.3% Military Construction $23.9 billion +19.0% Family Housing $3.1 billion −20.2% Total Spending 683.7 billion +3.0% |
06-30-2012, 09:54 AM | #4 |
Zilvia Member
|
It's not necessarily fighting for other countries freedom, I don't think the regime actually cares. It's for the regime's own agenda. What was it, something like two or three dictators in a year? That doesn't happen very often. Gaddafi was actually a friend to Israel and they went in there and started an uprising. Same thing with Egypt (they weren't friends with Israel but now the Muslim Brotherhood is in charge, surprise, surprise). It would be nice to have some money spent here once in a while. It doesn't matter now though, the people don't have a say anymore.
On the other hand, I'd rather call it the "Offense Budget". |
06-30-2012, 10:21 PM | #5 |
Post Whore!
|
I don't care how much airshows cost. I want to see MORE of them.
Love jets, man.
__________________
http://bhworld.wordpress.com/ |
06-30-2012, 10:58 PM | #7 | |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange Park, FL (Jax)
Posts: 1,468
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I find it ludicrous for things like homeland security "borrows" 5 global hawks with the intention of doing port surveillance and then stuffs one into the ground. Military Global Hawk drone crashes in Maryland - latimes.com 170+million drone protecting a port while students get the shaft in local schools. Priorities man. Priorities
__________________
Eye on the Prize |
|
06-30-2012, 11:20 PM | #8 |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Austin, Texas
Age: 40
Posts: 1,162
Trader Rating: (13)
Feedback Score: 13 reviews
|
We do have a revenue problem, we are taking less money in under the last five presidents excluding Clinton ! Clinton raised taxes and left a surplus! Reagan raised the debt ceiling 18 times in his presidency!! We need to kill all the private contracts, or place them on hold until each contract and their performance is reviewed! That will save billions by itself! Every business must pay federal taxes. No corporate hand outs or subsidies to oil companies or any other business!
|
06-30-2012, 11:48 PM | #9 |
Man w/ CTSV & a Car Seat
|
Ive been in in the military for almost 12 yrs. Fraud waste and abuse is rampant in the military. Perfect example, buying office stuff. I have to buy items from certain vendors on line or on base, I get charged a grip more since they're gov contracts. Just a small example, box of printer paper. Office max price = $40, GSA price = $56. Thats just a small example.
|
07-01-2012, 06:16 PM | #10 | |
Leaky Injector
|
Quote:
FYI. You can buy from office max...just tell them its for the base and make sure you bring your receipt to your card holder. They also won't charge you tax. |
|
07-02-2012, 05:11 AM | #12 | |
Zilvia Member
|
Quote:
And people say government cannot create jobs... the largest contractor in the entire world is the United States Government. |
|
07-07-2012, 12:50 PM | #13 |
Leaky Injector
|
|
09-22-2012, 11:07 PM | #14 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
The reason that many Government furnished goods cost more is because of the requirements. Every contract is different but their are some stupid ass specs out there. Packaging requirements, testing data, unique performance specs ect. So while I can go to Autozone and buy a brake pad for $35... its two per box, while the Gov wants 4 per. It has no test data per production lot, the cardboard is single ply instead of double and the 3rd Party that is selling at Autozone never completed a flammability test in a Government certified lab that costs $18k. I'm not eating 18k... I'm going to bake that into my final price... and boom... $80 brake pads by the time you are done. |
|
06-30-2012, 11:55 PM | #15 |
Post Whore!
|
It's not just military.
"If Mr. Obama wins re-election, and his budget projections prove accurate, the National Debt will top $20 trillion in 2016, the final year of his second term. That would mean the Debt increased by 87 percent, or $9.34 trillion, during his two terms." Scary stuff. This mentality seems to be spreading. Hey if the govt can do it why can't I?!?! U.S. is out of control on so many levels. |
07-01-2012, 03:45 PM | #16 | |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Age: 40
Posts: 1,845
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
"az_240 got a 650 on his SATs" See how that works? No reference, no value to the words.
__________________
|
|
07-01-2012, 07:30 PM | #17 | |
Zilvia Member
|
Quote:
|
|
07-02-2012, 05:06 AM | #18 | |
Zilvia Member
|
Quote:
And make sure you add in the amount of money Bush had to lose before he began running deficits.... yeah because that wouldn't be important to the argument... PolitiFact New Jersey | Bill Clinton touts fiscal record as president during campaign stop in New Jersey Origin, stay out of the Loud Noises threads until you learn how to 1. answer questions, 2. do research, and 3. Comprehend the issues you talk about. Whatever mind control glen beck is using on you to turn your brain into a watery gravy is working overtime. |
|
07-14-2012, 03:23 PM | #19 | |
Zilvia Junkie
|
Quote:
At any rate, yeah, military spending is nuts. BUT, to reply to the original post comparing our military spending to that of China, I think that their Trillions go much further than our Trillions. Of course our military is probably still more advanced, but their wages and production costs etc. etc. yada yada is much, much cheaper than ours. So (hypothetically speaking) our one million might equal their $500,000 (probably not that big of a gap, but you get what I'm trying to say). |
|
07-02-2012, 02:47 PM | #21 |
Philosopher King
|
I'm fine with having a huge military and spending a lot of cash on it. But I'm not fine with that military being spread all over the world doing things the public isn't readily informed of.
I'm very not fine with the MASSIVE budgets the navy and airforce get to blow on experimental stuff that will never see the light of day. If we stopped developing new jets today it would be decades before anyone even had the remotest possibility to catch up. The B-2 Spirit is something like 25 years old and there isn't anything close out there that we aren't developing. With all the money being spent on the military we still have issues of living conditions and basic supplies. We still farm out labor at all levels to contractors. So how about we shift that money to other things in our country. Like competent high speed rail. More arts and sciences research grants. Public education budgets(with no bs federal strings attached). Rebuild our roads, dams, bridges, etc. There is just too much that needs done here to worry about the stability of some country the size of the county I live in halfway across the globe, especially when the instability was caused by us to start with.
__________________
G O L D E N B E A R R E P U B L I C |
07-07-2012, 04:18 PM | #22 |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Austin, Texas
Age: 40
Posts: 1,162
Trader Rating: (13)
Feedback Score: 13 reviews
|
OK, most of us can agree about the spending but how about the revenue! How much money do we have to borrow from China? Majority of the people in this thread blames Obama, but what about the House and Senate, there the ones giving out the tax breaks, the loop holds and agreeing to the austerity measures. These measures are boosted by the republicans, but have doomed most of Europe. Government must spend to create jobs, we need to rebuild America ASAP! Private companies care about their bottom line! If the majority of the Country follows Romney's 49 or 59 economical plan this country will end up like Europe! No revenue means borrowing, which means defense cuts, and less jobs for the military and civilian sector!
BBC News - EU austerity drive country by country |
07-08-2012, 06:12 AM | #23 | |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Orange Park, FL (Jax)
Posts: 1,468
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
They're going to need to spend less and take in more which is an impossible sell to the people because their actions have never matched their words. Give them more money and they won't keep spending the same. Anyone got a line by line breakdown of what we spent 5 trillion on that was so mission critical that it required us to tax the production of our generations to come to pay for it?
__________________
Eye on the Prize |
|
07-09-2012, 06:55 PM | #24 | |
Zilvia FREAK!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Austin, Texas
Age: 40
Posts: 1,162
Trader Rating: (13)
Feedback Score: 13 reviews
|
Spending
Quote:
I dont want massive spending! I want the same taxes under Clinton, I want tax loop holes closed! Most of our military spending was bullshit contract and politicians greasing their pockets by any means! The last 10 years have been war profiteering at its finest. The only people hurt are the tax payers! |
|
07-10-2012, 01:15 PM | #25 |
Post Whore!
|
and soldiers...
__________________
http://bhworld.wordpress.com/ |
07-10-2012, 02:02 PM | #26 |
Zilvia Member
|
^+1
Like said before, gove contracts are outrageous! The big companies that provide for the military, GE for example charge an arm and a leg for stuff that was developed back in the 70s-80s. Another example is a box of tape cost around $1000. Anywhere else would charge a fraction of that. Dig a bit deeper. Supply and demand, unfortunately the big companies in America are a cause of the amount of military funding. |
07-10-2012, 02:32 PM | #27 | |
Nissanaholic!
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Murrieta,CA
Age: 35
Posts: 1,648
Trader Rating: (1)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Quote:
|
|
09-22-2012, 11:12 PM | #28 | |
Post Whore!
|
Quote:
As I just stated. The Military is HORRENDOUS with spec-ing out shit. Go pull the prints for this stuff and check out all the military requirements. You realize those bolts at ACE have sort of Garbage chinese coating on them while the military is going to be calling out any number of specific coatings, not to mention actual certified lab testing results showing you pass salt-spray ect. Combine that with Government requirements to buy from smalls, minority owned ect... |
|
07-11-2012, 08:16 PM | #29 |
Philosopher King
|
The government shouldn't be contracting for anything military related. Why should an entire theater of combat hing on a single IT guy from General Dynamics not being an ass about a password on some piece of equipment?
__________________
G O L D E N B E A R R E P U B L I C |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|