|
Home | Rules & Guidelines | Register | Member Rides | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Chat General Discussion About The Nissan 240SX and Nissan Z Cars |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-21-2014, 09:07 PM | #31 |
Zilvia Member
|
I made the thread to show the progression of events, i wanted all the details i could get, i did not want to be retroactively posting everything. Plus now everyone can go through the agonizing wait with me
|
Sponsored Links |
01-22-2014, 12:29 PM | #32 |
Zilvia Member
|
sub'd. I'm tired of owning an s14 and cressida daily. Wanted to dump them both for a BRZ but an r32 has always been a dream. Besides, who needs a warranty on anything?
|
02-01-2014, 07:01 PM | #38 | |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: It's dark, and hell is hot!
Posts: 9,413
Trader Rating: (23)
Feedback Score: 23 reviews
|
Quote:
...There's plenty of reasons... |
|
02-01-2014, 07:38 PM | #39 | |
Zilvia Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 353
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I am sure someone will add more detail but there is some legal bs that you can't legally import the vehicle unless it is exported straight out of the country of origin, which would be Japan. |
|
02-01-2014, 07:57 PM | #43 |
Post Whore!
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pair of dice, Norcal
Age: 31
Posts: 2,619
Trader Rating: (24)
Feedback Score: 24 reviews
|
I thought R32's are illegal in the states and R33's are legal.
R32's failed the crash test and R33's passed it. Once caught by the police, it will get crushed?
__________________
REVIEW |
02-01-2014, 08:27 PM | #44 | |
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: colorado springs, co
Age: 27
Posts: 34
Trader Rating: (0)
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
__________________
if you aint crammin big wheels you aint doing it right |
|
02-02-2014, 09:55 AM | #45 | |
Zilvia Addict
|
Quote:
The problem with the handful that have come in from Canada is that they technically shouldn't be permitted yet, because even if they had the correct paperwork showing the month of manufacture, the earliest those '89s would meet the requirement is the summer. Who knows what is going to happen to them, because they were technically imported incorrectly. Despite the fact that they filed all the correct paperwork and followed the established processes, they didn't meet the month requirement and expecting the Federal Government to say, "oh well, you slipped it by us so it's our fault and you're good to go" may be expecting too much... So, if a car from Canada doesn't have the original paperwork it doesn't mean it can't be imported. It just means that if the Canadian title shows it is a 1989, it could technically be a December '89, which means it could be imported after January 1st, 2015 because there is no way that it is less than 25 years old at that point. Why import from Japan? I can think of a few very good reasons: 1. Far more availability 2. Outfits like ourselves can have it tuned here 3. You can fly out and drift it before we ship it (possibly in a competition) The savings that can be had by getting a bunch of parts installed before it is shipped can literally offset the cost of shipping the car. If those parts are large like seats, roll cages, coilovers, differentials, aero parts, etc. this can result in a significant savings. As ridiculous as it sounds, we can ship a car to the US for not much more than a full aero kit...
__________________
www.gtr-garage.com |
|
03-01-2014, 08:43 AM | #51 | |
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wasaga Ontario
Age: 39
Posts: 28
Trader Rating: (1)
Feedback Score: 1 reviews
|
Quote:
wasn't the year change over still done in september back then? meaning a dec/89 car would have been sold as a 1990 model year car... |
|
03-01-2014, 04:01 PM | #52 |
Zilvia Member
|
|
03-01-2014, 07:34 PM | #56 |
Zilvia Member
|
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|