Quote:
Originally Posted by Agamemnon
You are, like most idiots of society, are jumping to conclusions that have zero facts.
The earth has been in a state of cool down. So if carbon is the reason for the supposed rise in global climate temps, then how come 1998 was the highest recorded year in the last 11 years? If carbon is on the increase, then your logic would then indicate that temps will follow. But they aren't.
|
this is info collected by a researcher at stanford
as you can see, the temp rise isn't linear, which explains how 1998 could be the highest (btw highest what? temp or carbon?)
here's another graph of carbon levels from michigan taken from ice cores
not sure where this one is from, but it basically says the same thing...
no need for your name calling. there are a couple of my sources after doing a quick search of my files. now lets see yours, bro
edit: found another pretty graph from one of my books. *note the graph ends at 1950 and our current carbon level is around 380ppt*
