|
I don't get how so many people are saying he "deserves" the house. How does he deserve the property? From a legal perspective, fine. He's doing nothing wrong. But from a moral perspective, he abused an age old law desperately in need of reform for his own personal gain. A guy swooping in and taking ownership of a $300k house in a decent neighborhood amist an economic downturn is hardly the intent of adverse possession laws.
|