Thread: Weight of Rims
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2013, 06:29 PM   #12
Kingtal0n
Post Whore!
 
Kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 38
Posts: 4,646
Trader Rating: (17)
Kingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kingtal0n
Quote:
Originally Posted by Croustibat View Post

Now if you really are a good driver, have a very good pedal feeling and control, and an absolute need to improve your times, then by all mean reduce wheel inertia.

But If you are not ? Forget it. Driving will just be harder.

So, just to be clear, your reason is that everyone sucks at driving and thats the reason why not to reduce rotating mass. lol


Crusti, aluminum connecting rods exist, and so do lightweight flywheels and lightweight driveshafts. If those parts didnt work, they wouldnt keep making them for years and years. People would eventually figure it out and stop buying that product.

YOU didnt notice the increase in fuel economy and acceleration because YOU did not have the right logging tools or engine setup. I, with my little data-logger software and my lead foot on the dyno DID notice a difference in fuel economy and acceleration when adding a knife edged crankshaft to an SR20DET for instance.

Just depends on the setup and intended use for the vehicle. Lighter is better in general because rotating mass is an energy hog. Thats all Im saying and its dead accurate.
__________________
5.3/4l80e/turbo 240sx playthrough:
https://tinyurl.com/turbo240
Kingtal0n is offline   Reply With Quote