|
plants are living organisms too.
(and if you're eating that then probably you're destroying even more lives in numerical terms to satisfy your appetite)
unless you're eating poop, something has to perish in order to provide you with some form of sustenance.
I can understand if one chooses to eat food based on ecological impact, cruelty to the animals or the relevant health risks.
This is just collecting random data for the sake of it.
I'm sure it's interesting if you've nothing better to do.
Not saying that choosing what we eat doesn't have it's costs, I just don't see how this study measures anything worth a rat's ass.
|