View Single Post
Old 10-18-2009, 07:03 PM   #12
GSXRJJordan
Post Whore!
 
GSXRJJordan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: << 626 >>
Posts: 9,135
Trader Rating: (19)
GSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfectionGSXRJJordan is close to perfection
Send a message via AIM to GSXRJJordan
This really isn't that much of a change in gun control policy from where CA is at right now. We currently have fingerprinting/background checks/basic coursework/in-person class and a mental segment somewhere, I don't recall how in depth it is. Kind of a "common-sense" law, although I'm basically opposed to stricter laws (would prefer stricter enforcement of existing laws).

Quote:
Originally Posted by S14_Kouki View Post
Really a physical evaluation. Are they going to make you run a obstacle coures or the physical at the doctor. Why does it matter what physical shape you are in?? Add to this I know its not going to be free for the mental/physical test so is the government going to pay?? In return they will up the tax's
Barry has a good point on the physical, and in CA we take care of that aspect with the in-person training course. If you can't safely operate the weapon and hit the target 7ft-10ft away, you don't pass, period. Women have much more trouble with this, obviously.

In CA, the permit applicant pays all fees, so the cost of getting a permit would rise, not taxes.
__________________


Jordan Innovations has a new web site!
www.JordanInnovations.com -- All your favorite FD Pro Drifters love it, trust me -- www.JordanInnovations.com
GSXRJJordan is offline   Reply With Quote