View Single Post
Old 11-24-2009, 05:03 PM   #15
Agamemnon
Premium Member
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lake Stevens, WA
Age: 38
Posts: 2,585
Trader Rating: (20)
Agamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfectionAgamemnon is close to perfection
Quote:
Originally Posted by deolio View Post
in the 50's, they (scientists) though we were headed for an ice age. this isn't according to me, that is according to my information. people get their numbers from different sources, but they all pretty much suggest the same thing.

i'm not sure if water molecules refract light the same way carbon molecules... might be something to look into...

i don't really understand what that graph is actually representing... probably because i've been up for 28 hours writing a paper and studying, but the bottom line is carbon is something we don't need any more of in our atmosphere. i'm sick of people arguing this shit to death as if being more environmentally conscious is a bad thing.

my personal oppinion is that it's a natural cycle that has most likely been aided by man. i just haven't found any sound evidence for any other reason why temps and carbon levels are rising to sway my opinion any other way. i don't think it's going to be a dooms day scenario like some people say. new weather patterns are all that's really changing.
I agee with you on all counts, except when it comes to man-made CO2 emissions as the sole reason for any kind of upshift in earth's global temps. There is much evidence to show that there isnt a direct correlation between CO2 and the sudden rise in temps.

With that being said, I agree that being more environmentally conscious is a great thing.
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote