I'm not attacking you so don't take this personal.
You first said this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger240
technology can supplement workers, if people out there really want to argue that we need thousands of people to pick strawberries because nobody in america can develop a better way, well then your opinion of america is so messed up theres no point arguing with you, go read a book
|
Then you said this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger240
sure, but i'm taking about people being paid next to nothing to pick strawberries. simple tasks that can easily be mechanized.
besides i was never talking about guys who do Deadliest Catch stuff..
|
I am having problems following your argument.
Are you commenting about simple tasks in general? strawberry picking in particular? all tasks?
It seems like your first statement was talking about strawberry and orange. Your statement was also very open ended because you didn't say that there are tasks that cannot be mechanized.
At best, you said that jobs would be eliminated to be replaced with other jobs. You never actually said that some jobs cannot be eliminated.
Now you say that you're not talking about deadliest catch guys.
I'm having trouble following your logic.
1. What task(s) do you think can be mechanised?
2. What task(s) do you think canNOT be mechanised?
3. If you gave an answer for #2, does this answer contradict with your original statement:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger240
if people out there really want to argue that we need thousands of people to pick strawberries because nobody in america can develop a better way, well then your opinion of america is so messed up theres no point arguing with you, go read a book
|