|
Reading the title I expected this to be a different type of population control lol.
I feel it is a bit of a one-sided argument, due to the fact that it deals with prohibiting human potential/ reproduction. A comparable argument would be "Let's allow only Group X to gather/eat food, because our resources are limited." It is a viable (although necessary) human process conducive to life, and to constrain this act could be seen the same way.
Forgive me if this made no sense, it's late and I didn't want to forget my response lol.
But I believe a better population control would be to limit the amount of children people are allowed to have. I know, it still says "no", but it doesn't prohibit the behavior altogether.
|