View Single Post
Old 05-27-2013, 10:22 AM   #20
Kingtal0n
Post Whore!
 
Kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 38
Posts: 4,649
Trader Rating: (17)
Kingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kingtal0n
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sileighty_85 View Post
So what your saying is that Nissan had no idea on what they were doing when they built these engines that have proven to last 20+ years with factory equipment while driving 70+mph on toll roads?

If that is the case why have these engines lasted 20+ years of DDing?
what kind of nonsense is that? I said that? I where did I say that. quote me.
You asked a physics question I gave you a physics answer. had nothing to do with road speed, chassis design flaws, inherent risks of swapping an engine, length of time engines sat in warehouses before being swapped, etc... thats a WHOLE different thing.
__________________
5.3/4l80e/turbo 240sx playthrough:
https://tinyurl.com/turbo240
Kingtal0n is offline   Reply With Quote