View Single Post
Old 08-18-2010, 05:00 AM   #10
bb4_96
Zilvia Addict
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Under my car
Posts: 785
Trader Rating: (4)
bb4_96 is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger240 View Post
if you really want to make things ''fair'' dont use income alone... figure incomeXhours worked and you'd have to have a reasonable floor on this as some bozo who works part time under the table making 200/week working 15 hrs shouldnt have to pay 30 bucks for speeding whereas someone working 50 would have to pay 300

why? because its easier for the bozo to knock that 30 dollar fine than it is someone making a grand a week or whatever
Who cares if he works 50 hours a week? If he makes 6 figures it doesn't matter how much someone works $100 still isnt going to be a deterrent. As far as the under the table argument your either making the under the table cashflow crowd sound like a huge income sector or your proposing a noticeable portion of the nation is hiding their income. The fairness in that situation would wind up being best case scenario like any other federal program... full of loopholes, bugs, caveats, and be marginally functional.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ranger240 View Post
what about students? does some 16 year old driving 80 in a 55 get penalized less because he only makes 3 grand a year at a summer job?
If it's based on income. He'd get hit with a fine based on his income. Besides a 16year old doing 25 over is going to get his license suspended per graduated licensing.
bb4_96 is offline   Reply With Quote