Quote:
Originally Posted by slider2828
Personally I have seen why a .86 over a .64.....
For my setup a stock intake and exhaust manifolds, and 264 step 1 cams, to have 320HP and 270ft.lbs of torque at 16.5 psi on a dyno dynamics... I highly doubt a .64 can reach it with the same setup. Yes bla bla bla do this and that and boost up on the .64 and yeah it can do it.... But that is apples to oranges....
You have to create the same scenario with two different turbo's on the same boost level, otherwise like I said its apples to oranges. At 4800RPM I made Peak Torque and 5200 Made peak HP.... Like I said I doubt a .64 will do that on the same setup....
Keep in mind I track this car and is conservatively tuned by steve shadows.....
Whatever that maybe, you can't start changing a billion things and just compare the turbos, that just isn't good statistics.
|
What do you mean? are you saying a .64 wont make the same power at 16.5?
Or a .64 wont break 320whp?
Im making 363whp and 332ft lbs tq @ 21 psi on a .64
with stock cams and intake manifold on a Mustang Dyno
__________________

後輪駆動車1番
1989 Built SR GT2871R -363whp
1998 S14 W/RB25- 250ish (For Now)
1986 SR86 - 200ish
1990 R32 GTR - 320hp
Don't Buy Engines from JDM-Online
#/f/businesses/207457-jdm-online.html
Don't Buy XS-Power or SSAC Shit