Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum (#/f/index.php)
-   Chat (#/f/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   The banning of vehicle modifications / race car conversions (#/f/showthread.php?t=623484)

Krazykouki 02-09-2016 06:41 AM

The banning of vehicle modifications / race car conversions
 
Call to arms to get everyone involved to stop stupid $hit like this from happening. :rant2:

https://www.sema.org/news/2016/02/08...-into-racecars
Quote:

Originally Posted by ixfxi (Post 6019428)


exitspeed 02-09-2016 07:43 AM

Instead of manning up and going after China, where you can't see across the street some days, the EPA wants to outlaw a hobby of every day citizens. I would point fingers but whats the point.

Green Arrow 02-09-2016 07:59 AM

Thanks obama

iJDM 02-09-2016 08:11 AM

I agree with you OP, however I think it's an uphill battle for the EPA. Are they going to stop any "off road use only" aftermarket support for every vehicle ever made? Would be tough to do and probably take a long time.... Just my guess

zenkicpe 02-09-2016 08:15 AM

Some serious ass, ass problems...

exitspeed 02-09-2016 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iJDM (Post 6016676)
I agree with you OP, however I think it's an uphill battle for the EPA. Are they going to stop any "off road use only" aftermarket support for every vehicle ever made? Would be tough to do and probably take a long time.... Just my guess

It would be logistically impossible to remove any and all previously produced aftermarket parts in the country, but what they could do is make regulations that would make it virtually impossible for aftermarket companies to exist after the regulations are put in place. If say aftermarket parts needed certain amount of testing to comply with the new regulations it would make the parts more expensive, provide less of a performance increase and irrelevant. This would cost thousands upon thousands of jobs and close countless small and medium size businesses.

Now, you have to think of how much money the auto manufacturers have invested in performance models aimed at people who want to mod them. Everyone from Huyndai to Cadillac has performance models and divisions which spend billions of dollars in r&d, marketing, talent, etc etc. Besides SEMA I would think the auto industry would stand against this kind of overreach, especially with no actual evidence that this will even make the tiniest difference towards their "goal".

It's a stretch for this to happen. However, like any government regulation, they will probably pass a smaller regulation now, with hopes of many smaller regulations in the future to achieve this over the long term.

scottie 02-09-2016 08:44 AM

Aftermarket products and "off road use only" items probably result in 0.005% of Green House Gas emissions. I guess now that they have regulated the energy industry they are going after the automotive industry including the aftermarket. Just like the 2nd Amendment, this is government overreaching at its finest.

2muchboost 02-09-2016 08:51 AM

Not one for politics but irony in the governments action is pretty outrageous. I work in the Safety/Environmental Engineering field and can tell you Scottie is right. These types of mods are less than 1% of the emissions issues and pollution. I cant rant on and on about other sources and how obviously damaging they are yet the blind eye is turned to that.

Krazykouki 02-09-2016 09:11 AM

The only thing I can really do about it is spread the word. I fear that if most are quiet about it, we'll all end up driving Prius's....I had a nightmare one time that I owned a Prius.

exitspeed 02-09-2016 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottie (Post 6016686)
Aftermarket products and "off road use only" items probably result in 0.005% of Green House Gas emissions. I guess now that they have regulated the energy industry they are going after the automotive industry including the aftermarket. Just like the 2nd Amendment, this is government overreaching at its finest.

I'd argue it's even less than .005%. All the regulations and changes we've made over the last 30 years has apparently done 0 to effect "global warming/climate change". 2015 was the "hottest yearly record".

Jorgs_7 02-09-2016 09:25 AM

Sounds like they would just tighten up on already "off-road use only" part sales?

dsastr_clan 02-09-2016 09:45 AM

someone in the EPA saw one of them coalie guy videos, i wouldnt mind if they ban 'em

STEEZxIT 02-09-2016 10:53 AM

i really did have a nightmare that i owned and drove a prius.

STEEZxIT 02-09-2016 10:53 AM

if this goes through, i will be shopping around for new citizenship.

Levan. B 02-09-2016 10:58 AM

Signed it.

2muchboost 02-09-2016 11:34 AM

Global warming aside there are plenty of KNOWN pollution sources that are approved for the sole reason that "they drive the economy." Again I dont have to get into details but some of the data and information is what I analyze for work and can promise you that is the least of the worries when it comes to environmental concern.

ZenkiKid 02-09-2016 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2muchboost (Post 6016688)
Not one for politics but irony in the governments action is pretty outrageous. I work in the Safety/Environmental Engineering field and can tell you Scottie is right. These types of mods are less than 1% of the emissions issues and pollution. I cant rant on and on about other sources and how obviously damaging they are yet the blind eye is turned to that.

no joke Ive heard that Cow shit is a bigger issue with emissions/green house gases than cars do.

Highway Riding 02-09-2016 12:32 PM

Signed! Next you will have to mark down how much steak you eat per week and how many sugars in your coffee.

Gingersmurf 02-09-2016 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenkiKid (Post 6016761)
no joke Ive heard that Cow shit is a bigger issue with emissions/green house gases than cars do.

Actually, it is the methane produced from cows (farts) The amount of cows (US Alone) that is needed for beef for human consumption far outweighs the GH Gasses the cars in the world produce. There has been talks about putting domes over major farms to trap the gasses, and pulling them into vessels or storage containers to be used later as a fuel of some sort. The major issue is the absence of natural light, the heat from the cows and sun, and the possibility of exploding the whole damn farm.

Food for thought.

STR8 H8N 02-09-2016 12:59 PM

this is old news

Cash 02-09-2016 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gingersmurf (Post 6016767)
Actually, it is the methane produced from cows (farts) The amount of cows (US Alone) that is needed for beef for human consumption far outweighs the GH Gasses the cars in the world produce. There has been talks about putting domes over major farms to trap the gasses, and pulling them into vessels or storage containers to be used later as a fuel of some sort. The major issue is the absence of natural light, the heat from the cows and sun, and the possibility of exploding the whole damn farm.

Food for thought.

Maybe just attach a balloon-type gas capturing device to each cow's asshole.

exitspeed 02-09-2016 02:38 PM

Autoblog received a statement from the EPA. The gist is if you have removed things like your cat or reflashed your ECU you are already breaking the law.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/02/09/e...date-official/

Corbic 02-09-2016 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZenkiKid (Post 6016761)
no joke Ive heard that Cow shit is a bigger issue with emissions/green house gases than cars do.


12 largest container ships pollute more in one year then all the worlds cars combined.

Want to stop pollution? Shutdown all manufacturing in Asia. Force regulations that all products sold in the US and Europe must be made in accordance with US/EU standards of safety, welfare and environmental regulations.

Game Over.

OBEEWON 02-09-2016 02:47 PM

I'm for this bill because race cars you can't drive on the street are dumb.
They need to write into it no tube chassis too.

Gingersmurf 02-09-2016 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exitspeed (Post 6016847)
Autoblog received a statement from the EPA. The gist is if you have removed things like your cat or reflashed your ECU you are already breaking the law.

http://www.autoblog.com/2016/02/09/e...date-official/

That has to just about every single race car that currently exists. Any word on stand alone ECU's or Non-OEM ECU's? Engine swaps that have a different ECU from the shell but still OEM un-tuned? Even the pro racing teams use modified ECU's. I'm not completely sold on this actually going through, too many variables i think

EDacIouSX 02-09-2016 02:55 PM

effin government.

exitspeed 02-09-2016 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Corbic (Post 6016851)
12 largest container ships pollute more in one year then all the worlds cars combined.

Want to stop pollution? Shutdown all manufacturing in Asia. Force regulations that all products sold in the US and Europe must be made in accordance with US/EU standards of safety, welfare and environmental regulations.

Game Over.

Exxxxxatly. O*#%a and the EPA rather shit on our economy and our citizens then put pressure on China because we owe them so much fucking money. :picardfp:

Matej 02-09-2016 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exitspeed (Post 6016685)
If say aftermarket parts needed certain amount of testing to comply with the new regulations it would make the parts more expensive, provide less of a performance increase and irrelevant. This would cost thousands upon thousands of jobs and close countless small and medium size businesses.

No more Godspeed. :(

Aeroscraper326 02-09-2016 03:58 PM

Lololol Matej RIP godspeed

Krazykouki 02-09-2016 05:14 PM

R.I.P motorsports in general.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright © 1998 - 2019, Zilvia.net™