![]() |
Quebec RHD ban.
Do I live in Canada, no. But I found this interesting.
Quote:
|
Yeah, I don't see what the big deal is against RHD.
the worst I can think of is that it's a minor inconvenience w/ toll booths. gov'ts could just RHD cars a bit more & profit off of it. be thankful you don't have CARB-like laws out there. |
i've always kind of wanted to have a rhd car, just so people at drive thrus and parking attendants and valets would be like "LOL WUT". other than that i see no appeal, and it's a minor handicap being on the wrong side of the car.
|
^^ Or being on the correct side of the car! hahahaha!!! depends on POV...
|
oy vey, I live one province over from Quebec. Thats a stupid law.
|
any politicians will always have something new? why not focus on drug smuggling and criminals
geeez |
theres a carls jr near my work with the drive thru pick up window is on the passenger side....
|
Way to fail again, canada......
...stupids. |
There is no point to RHD
...unless the car only comes in RHD ...and it is a cool car. |
Quote:
Ya....like mail trucks! |
This is important...
Not. Sounds like the board of transport is just bored. |
Quote:
those who brag about it, is completely meaningless imo. that being said, I also don't see why there should be anything against it either. It's not like like it would be more of a pollutant and/or more unsafe. It's not like it would give the said politician more or less votes to ban RHD. If anything, govt's are just cutting off another source of revenue they could otherwise tax. (yeah it's not a lot of $$$, but it's revenue nonetheless). I really fail to comprehend the rationale behind such meaningless laws. It's almost like the governments are banning shit for the sake of it. |
Quote:
|
its great on the track if your right handed.
but in reality, they suck dick. left hand turns are brutal, no drive thrus.. bleh |
Quote:
|
damn.. i cant stand all these governmental regulations, to me its all bullshit!! whats next they gonna impose a law on motor vehicles even those that are found in their own country, its not the car that dangerous, its the stupid drivers that the DMV passes that makes a car dangerous shit even i can make a geo metro dangerous !!! i dont see this law being justified, to me its just another way of making the government control the masses!!
|
Quote:
also, this is Canada we're talking about. not southern California. |
Quote:
|
i think they should. you're just creating a handicap by driving on the wrong side on public roads. you are creating a safety hazard.
and to this community, not being able to convert to rhd would be like not being able to bedazzle your favorite capri pants. |
Quote:
|
RHD is boring. Nissans are boring.
I'm getting rid of my RHD Nissan for a Lotus. This thread is boring. Fap |
Quote:
and I prefer shifting with a lhd. Having driven in some miscellaneous parts of europe, japan, & hong kong (learned to drive there), I can say it just doesn't feel right driving in a rhd car, and shifting with my right hand. maybe it's just a matter of practice, idk. I'm sure ppl just get used to it either way. |
Quote:
|
This is what socialized healthcare will lead to.
|
Quote:
|
rhd is ghay anyway
|
OK I'll try to explain some points.
First, you must know that in Québec, we have the SAAQ (as mentionned in the article). They provide standard DMV services, like plates and driving license, but they also provide an universal "personal damage" coverage for all Québec residents for every accident related to cars. We all pay $60+ (I don't know exactly) each year on our license for that coverage (which we don't have to pay through a private insurance compagny, obviously) and we get coverage for physical damage in a car accident, or even physical damage if we are hit by a car as a pedestrian for example. You must also know that the funds of the SAAQ were "wrongly" taken to finance other spheres of the governement. So right now, the SAAQ is in the red. So, when the SAAQ sees those new kind of cars, and they see those awful "statistics", they sure don't want to pay, so they ban them. Problem is that the statistics they base their judgment on are either wrong or biaised. The only real study was done in British Columbia by the association of insurers or something... So they decided to ban for 6 months. But you see, the 6 months expired in November 09... They could not prove that RHD caused more accidents, so they decided to continue the "temporary" ban for another 6 months.... And there is another reason why they would want to ban them... Pure politics... the current Québec governement is pursuing all the car and bike enthusiasts for the sake of "safety". And it works, with all the baby boomers agreeing blindly!! They introduced speed cameras and red light cameras. They introduced bigger fines for excessive speeding (remember they are broke). They doubled, tripled and even quadrupled the cost of a motorcycle driving license (they say its because they are dangerous on the road... but it's because they are broke). They ban RHD cars for.. who knows how much time now... all for safety. But we all know it's because it's a joke to get your driving license here. Make driving school harder and more useful, with winter driving, night driving courses. That will reduce accidents. Anyway sorry for the rant.:hs: |
yes, lets ban anything we can on this continent before we can actually certify that it is not safe for the roads after intensive crash testing and driving as auto manufactures do. Importation of jspec cars is good business in Vancouver, B.C. if it gets banned there, ill know then that this big chunk of land called North America has gone down the shitter. and since when is liability such a concern in a socialist country, and is this just a french thing? hmm.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
guess what, Vancouver will be fine without importing a handful of 15 year old shitboxes yearly. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright © 1998 - 2019, Zilvia.net™