Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum (#/f/index.php)
-   LOUD NOISES (#/f/forumdisplay.php?f=105)
-   -   the extreme end of capital punishment? (#/f/showthread.php?t=297429)

brndck 12-29-2009 10:29 AM

the extreme end of capital punishment?
 
China executes Briton despite UK, family pleas - Yahoo! News

CLIFFS: china executed a british man for smuggling 9lbs of heroin into the country. the uk claims he was mentally unbalanced.

is this too extreme? many of us in the u.s. wish we had stricter punishment for criminals, but where do you draw the line? how far is too far?
discuss.

Quote:

URUMQI, China – China brushed aside international appeals Tuesday and executed by lethal injection a British drug smuggler who relatives say was mentally unstable and unwittingly lured into crime.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown said he was "appalled" at the execution of 53-year old Akmal Shaikh — China's first of a European citizen in nearly 60 years. His government summoned the Chinese ambassador in London to express its anger.

China defended its handling of the case, saying there had not been documentary proof Shaikh was mentally ill. Beijing also criticized Brown's comments, but said it hoped the case would not harm bilateral relations. The Foreign Ministry called on London not to create any "obstacles" to better ties.

Shaikh's daughter Leilla Horsnell was quoted by the BBC and other British media outlets as saying she was "shocked and disappointed that the execution went ahead with no regards to my dad's mental health problems, and I struggle to understand how this is justice."

The execution is the latest sign of how China's communist government, with its rising global economic and political clout, is increasingly willing to defy Western complaints over its justice system and human rights record.

Last week, a court sentenced the co-author of a political reform manifesto to 11 years in prison in what rights groups called a direct rebuff to international pressure. Diplomats from more than a dozen countries were shut out of Liu Xiaobo's trial on subversion charges. The United States called for his immediate release.

Earlier in the month, China urged Cambodia to interrupt a U.N. refugee screening process and subsequently Phnom Penh repatriated 20 ethnic Uighur asylum seekers accused of involvement in ethnic unrest in western China.

Shaikh, a Briton of Pakistani descent, was arrested in 2007 for carrying a suitcase with almost 9 pounds (4 kilograms) of heroin into China on a flight from Tajikistan. He told Chinese officials he didn't know about the drugs and that the suitcase wasn't his, according to Reprieve, a London-based prisoner advocacy group that is helping with his case.

He was convicted in 2008 after a half-hour trial.

He first learned he was about to be executed Monday from his visiting cousins, who made a last-minute plea for his life. They say he is mentally unstable and was lured to China from a life on the street in Poland by men playing on his dreams to record a pop song for world peace.

The press office of the Xinjiang region where Shaikh had been held confirmed the execution in a statement handed to journalists.

In his statement issued by the Foreign Office, Brown said he condemned the execution "in the strongest terms, and am appalled and disappointed that our persistent requests for clemency have not been granted."

"I am particularly concerned that no mental health assessment was undertaken," Brown said.

The Foreign Office said Foreign Minister Ivan Lewis on Tuesday had reiterated to China's ambassador, Fu Ying, statements by Brown and Foreign Secretary David Miliband condemning Shaikh's execution.

Brown had spoken personally to China's prime minister about the case. Miliband had earlier condemned the execution and said there were unanswered questions about the trial — including over whether there was adequate interpretation during the trial.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Jiang Yu responded that drug smuggling was a serious crime.

"We express our strong dissatisfaction and opposition to the British accusation," Jiang told a regularly scheduled news conference in Beijing.

The official Xinhua News Agency quoted China's Supreme Court as saying Tuesday that although officials from the British Embassy and a British aid organization called for a mental health examination for Shaikh, "the documents they provided could not prove he had a mental disorder nor did members of his family have a history of mental disease."

"There is no reason to cast doubt on Akmal Shaikh's mental status," the Supreme Court was quoted as saying.

Xinhua said Shaikh was put to death by lethal injection. China, which executes more people than any other country, is increasingly doing so by lethal injection, although some death sentences are still carried out by a shot in the head.

The Beijing-based lawyer for Shaikh's death sentence review, Zhang Qingsong, said Tuesday he never got to meet with Shaikh despite asking the judge and the detention center for access. He said China's highest court never evaluated Shaikh's mental status.

According to Reprieve, the last European executed in China was Antonio Riva, an Italian pilot who was shot by a firing squad in 1951 after being convicted of involvement in what China said was a plot to assassinate Mao Zedong and other high-ranking communist officials.

"The death of Akmal Shaikh is a sad indictment of today's world, and particularly of China's legal system. ... We at Reprieve are sickened by what we have seen during our work on this case," said Sally Rowen, legal director of Reprieve's death penalty team.

Reprieve issued a statement from Shaikh's family members saying they expressed "their grief at the Chinese decision to refuse mercy."

The statement thanked supporters, including those who attended a vigil for Shaikh outside the Chinese Embassy in London on Monday night, along with members of a Facebook group that drew 5,000 members in just a few days.

The statement asked the media and public to respect the family's privacy as they "come to terms with what has happened to someone they loved."

Gareth Saunders, a British teacher who knew Shaikh in Warsaw, said his friend was cheerful but obviously very mentally ill. He said the last time they met in an underpass, Shaikh said he was traveling to Central Asia but would return in two weeks.

"I tried to contact after two weeks, no reply. that was the last time I tried to contact him," Saunders told The Associated Press.

Brian 12-29-2009 10:37 AM

I don't feel that he deserved the punishment.

slider2828 12-29-2009 11:16 AM

We can't use our countries view on capital punishment against other countries IMO. In China, Thailand, and Singapore, if your caught, you will get the death penalty period. If you look at those area's history with drugs such as opium and the such, I think its valid. Current day laws are based on the history of the country as it is considered past precedence.

Also in those areas, drug offenses are considered much more serious than it is here.

murda-c 12-29-2009 11:23 AM

it's cool they just drive the price of drugs up and I make more money.

rb26man 12-29-2009 11:33 AM

i say punishment should fit the crime and that totally didnt fit

ryguy 12-29-2009 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rb26man (Post 3208030)
i say punishment should fit the crime and that totally didnt fit

All depends on your viewpoint. 9 pounds of heroin is surely enough to effectively end the lives of other people. However, I disagree with the way China handled the mental disease aspect.

I personally think we should take a tougher stance on punishment in America.

aznpoopy 12-29-2009 11:48 AM

death penalty for drug smuggling? i'm totally down with that.

due process is another matter entirely. haha. US has a bit too much. but china has practically none at all.

driftking777 12-29-2009 11:54 AM

I know this is going to seem brash, but laws like this, although might be harsh, keep honest people honest, and take scum of the streets.

I personally hate the way Americas Judicial system works. You can be a convicted murderer (and admit to it) and sit on death row for years. What a waste of tax payers money. And we wonder why there is over crowding in the prison system. Then im sure someone will say something about the mentally unstable, but thats a another topic almost in itself.

i have a much much longer speech, but my son is crying. so im ending this now...

g6civcx 12-29-2009 11:58 AM

Other countries don't value human life as much as America. What's left to discuss?

slider2828 12-29-2009 12:02 PM

Pfffft... the mental aspect of what? He was able to buy 9LBS of Heroin... Come on... 1stly he was able to buy 9lbs of it somewhere.... If someone has a line to buy 9lbs on the street let me know cause it ain't that easy. 2ndly, he sane enough not to take 9lbs of it himself. 3rdly 9lbs being smuggled into china means he had a means of slangin it, so he can't be stupid. 4th, he was caught with it.... (what else is needed). 5th, its like OJ being smeared with Nicole's blood. He couldn't get off, now if it was heroin on the dudes glove then maybe hahahah

driftking777 12-29-2009 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aznpoopy (Post 3208064)
death penalty for drug smuggling? i'm totally down with that.

due process is another matter entirely. haha. US has a bit too much. but china has practically none at all.

agreed. msglenth

driftking777 12-29-2009 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g6civcx (Post 3208088)
Other countries don't value human life as much as America. What's left to discuss?

No some countries have zero tolerance for fuck ups. Neither do i. People make mistakes. But running drugs isnt a mistake, its a life choice.

Matej 12-29-2009 12:12 PM

Every criminal suddenly has a mental disorder.

driftking777 12-29-2009 12:13 PM

btw, before this gets locked for becoming political or anti whatever, it should probably be moved to new OT section (whatever its called)

murda-c 12-29-2009 12:14 PM

Why don't the chinese just stop buying the drugs?

g6civcx 12-29-2009 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by driftking777 (Post 3208114)
No some countries have zero tolerance for fuck ups. Neither do i. People make mistakes. But running drugs isnt a mistake, its a life choice.

Or they have a population problem.

driftking777 12-29-2009 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by g6civcx (Post 3208214)
Or they have a population problem.

Yes china does have a population problem. So does alot of nations (Japan for one)

Which in my mind further proves the point, why allow all these fucks ups run the streets after you catch them? You shouldnt, there are plenty of good people in the world that prefer it to be safer. I know i do. Catching and releasing criminals is not on my list of "Its OK"

g6civcx 12-29-2009 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by driftking777 (Post 3208453)
Yes china does have a population problem. So does alot of nations (Japan for one)

Which in my mind further proves the point, why allow all these fucks ups run the streets after you catch them? You shouldnt, there are plenty of good people in the world that prefer it to be safer. I know i do. Catching and releasing criminals is not on my list of "Its OK"

I have no issue with capital punishment and the crimes for which capital punishment may be prescribed.

I do have an issue with the standard of proof. How much is beyond reasonable doubt? 99.9%? 99? 95? 90%?

Do we need eyewitness testimony? video evidence? forensic evidence? How much is enough to be sure the person is guilty?

There is always a slight bit of doubt with every conviction. I just don't know how much would be enough to overturn a capital punishment sentence.

drift_limo 12-30-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slider2828 (Post 3208000)
We can't use our countries view on capital punishment against other countries IMO. In China, Thailand, and Singapore, if your caught, you will get the death penalty period. If you look at those area's history with drugs such as opium and the such, I think its valid. Current day laws are based on the history of the country as it is considered past precedence.

Also in those areas, drug offenses are considered much more serious than it is here.

so true.

I heard people in thailand that are from other countrys get cought and get the death penalty.

god bless america for real.
or else im pretty some in here would be on zilvia in cell block D right now.

upsdude 12-30-2009 08:04 PM

at least china has the balls to stand up to other countries and protects its sovereignty.. unlike the U.S. who bends over to whatever the U.N. wants, and apologizes for everything that is perceived as inappropriate. i'm not saying that china doesn't trample on it's citizens rights.

ronmcdon 12-31-2009 06:37 AM

Well, it is their laws and customs.
Dont go if you dont like it.
Its not like there are any surprises.

Tbh - i was actually surprised this was the 2nd european killed since the 1950's.
That seems very forgiving.

murda-c 12-31-2009 07:02 AM

Jeez guys it's just heroin.

not like it was anthrax lol.

kingkilburn 12-31-2009 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by driftking777 (Post 3208453)
Yes china does have a population problem. So does alot of nations (Japan for one)

Japan's population problem is that it is very sharply going down. No one's having any kids. The death to birth ratio is like 2/.75 or something along those lines. Even with immigration they can't keep up.

It probably a good thing for them though.

Brian 12-31-2009 01:43 PM

USA has a population problem.

have you guys driven in Southern California?

Weedm 12-31-2009 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian (Post 3211839)
USA has a population problem.

have you guys driven in Southern California?

Hahaha. Everyday and I can't agree more. Doesn't matter what freeway you're on, if it's during week day rush hours you're certainly due to hit traffic regardless.

Back to the topic. I don't think the guy deserved a death sentence. A jail sentence for a certain amount of years would have been a better verdict in my opinion. Regardless of how harshly strict their drug smuggling laws are, ending a human life over such a crime is not correct. But that's just an opinion from someone who is from America.

Forgiving is to set a prisoner free, and realizing that the prisoner was you.

drift_limo 12-31-2009 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian (Post 3211839)
USA has a population problem.

have you guys driven in Southern California?

no thats mexico we took it back.
lol


china has a bad population problem.

but as for there punishment I think they should. heroin is up there as one of the worse drugs and anybody that does it is just a loser.
so im glad they are gettin the death penalty. They should do the same for meth,coke and heroin addicts here in the US.

theicecreamdan 12-31-2009 07:24 PM

If somebody brought 9 pounds of heroin into my house I'd probably kill them... so.

HalveBlue 01-06-2010 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drift_limo (Post 3212156)
They should do the same for meth,coke and heroin addicts here in the US.

Why? :confused:

usdm180sx 01-06-2010 09:12 AM

Who saw that movie "Red Corner" with Richard Gere back in 1997? He was an attorney in China charged with murder but it was a total setup. If he was found guilty the Chinese court was going to shoot him and mail his family a bill for the bullet.

ronmcdon 01-06-2010 11:02 AM

Wow, that film was older than id care to admit.
some things dont change much.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNTA8-NCiCw

still it seems tame in comparison, to say Midnight Express in the late 70's
Dude was also busted for smuggling drugs.
No execution involved, but he was stuck in a miserable Turkish jail

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAY4aADKk08


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright © 1998 - 2019, Zilvia.net™