![]() |
The 2016 Miata ND Thread
This car really needs it's own thread. Still a long way before it goes on sale and lots of info still to be had.
|
|
They seriously need to make a coupe. I wonder if it would sell though, being a coupe would bring it closer the frs/brz market, minus the back seats (which could be seen as a good or bad thing with consumers i suppose).
|
Quote:
|
I dunno, the past 25 years have shown me that the Miata does not need a coupe version to be successful and the s2000 showed that a coupe version isn't isn't the only way to have a balanced/stiff chassis.
I'd rather have a robust factory turbo option that exceeds the Mazdaspeed NB. |
The Official 2016 Miata ND Thread
Quote:
I'd rather have a car without a smiling face. Why can Porsche design this absolutely disgustingly beautiful car that is nearly flawless in design but Mazda gives us a reject from the next "Cars" movie. I'm surprised Mazda couldn't integrate catfish whiskers or LED googelie eyes. https://photos.stuttcars.info/upload...ht-porsche.jpg http://www.cars.com/crp/vp/images/13.../profileup.jpg |
Quote:
Oh I should add Boxsters are fucking ugly and 911 cabriolets are ugly too. |
Quote:
Styling. Just like no one would call a GTi a girls car but people will make fun of you if you roll up in a Turbo New Beetle. The S2K (which I hate) is at least aggressive. The Boxster is timeless. |
Quote:
Ya A lot do Ferraris do too and I see no one putting them down. Face it this is a personal issue on your part. No one seems to be agreeing with you about it being a problem. Counseling perhaps? I kid but really get off the face thing man. It's a minor detail in a major improvement. One would say you can't see the forest for the trees. |
i dont see too much of a face on the new miata, the older one yes..
i see an inlet for air not a face although it looks a little droopy for my taste still excited even though i dont have the funds for one its nice to see new sport cars done right in this day and age of styling genisis is as fat as a camaro... half the time i see a FRS i mistake it for a TC so i cosign this as well... looks like a fun car haha any info on the engine thatll be thrown iin there |
I'm so excited for this. I think it looks bayad ayass. I'm a little underwhelmed by that exhaust note though.
a photoshop from the other thread: http://i840.photobucket.com/albums/z...ps752cf1ad.jpg 2016 can't come fast enough. I gotta replace this little guy: http://i840.photobucket.com/albums/z...psa0ea42fc.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
2200 is impresive for a modern day car sweet looking NB btw |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Gonna be honest here... I love Mazda's smiley face cars. Makes me smile whenever I see the previous gen Mazda 3. Brings back fun childhood memories of Wheelie & the Chopper bunch... lol
|
I just don't like how low down and skinny the headlights are, it's got a bit of a Hunchback of Notre Dame look, like the new Mustang.
Otherwise the rear end is on point, I'm very interested to see what it looks like with a hardtop on atleast. I'm not anti-vert, I've owned a S2000, but I always prefer a hardtop just for maintenance and security reasons. Good on them though for making it so light weight, hopefully they keep it simple on the electronics. |
love the front, wheel well arch, smiley grill and all.
my complaint is the rear, its kind of flat/plain on the design. maybe it needs a trunk lip or wider wheels to hide that pinched look. http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-27aNU08XyB...B-NC-ND-32.jpg I still cant believe its only 2200lbs. in the year of bulking sport cars. go mazda! fuck you nissan |
Quote:
|
2200lbs and 175hp sounds like a good time to me! i think i'd get one as a "daily" and then it would end up as a full track car in a couple of months haha
|
Quote:
|
Overall pretty excited about this car. Going to be interesting to see how it ends up. Since the looks have been addressed I'll chime in and say the headlights seem a little small or maybe a little low and forward in my opinion. I feel like it would be nicer on the eyes with a little tweaking.
As far as weight, I read 2400lbs, and if it is under 2500lbs I'd still be impressed. If this comes in lighter than the FR-S like projected, well, then what I'm curious about is the dimensions. The FR-S is pretty small. One thing I have a hard time seeing is the premise of 2200lbs and 175hp. Automotive development has exploded, and yes you can get crazy power right off the showroom floor, with a warranty to boot. But I still would not expect an entry level car like a miata to have that impressive a power to weight ratio stock. Regardless, I know Dave Coleman is involved in development, and that is really really good. Offtopic: Everyone on this site should know of Dave from project silvia/sport compact car mag, and I recommend any gearhead follow MotoIQ.com |
That is fugly. I am sorry to say it.. It really is ugly. Old miata was happy and looked cute and now this. It looks like it want's to rape and eat you. :(
|
^^^ No, you wanna know what fugly looks like? Go look at the FT-1 & the Nissan Vision GT Concept...
Quote:
|
Fucking noobs and 15 year olds coming out of the woodwork . Lol
|
Quote:
Ot: I hope FT-1 does have inline 6 twin turbo like 1JZ and 2JZ. |
Quote:
|
Ahahaha :D
|
|
They got it right I think! Makes me wanna give it a go
|
Take this shit to a miata forum
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
vB.Sponsors
Copyright © 1998 - 2019, Zilvia.net™