Look what I got in the mail! 56k, this is dumb, and not worth your time (5mb pics)

[Jeff240sx]

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/SonyDSCV3/Images/frontview-001.jpg

And I took this pic of my sleeping gf.. who won't let her face go over the net:
http://jeff.obhost.net/filestorage/Picture128.jpg

And her blanket.. from sitting in the same chair, the same distance away:
http://jeff.obhost.net/filestorage/Picture127.jpg

I'll save you guys the other 124 7.2mp pics of my foot, leg, television, fan, cat's ass, and other random apartment things.
But this camera is bad-ass.
-Jeff

[Jeff240sx]

Yes. I shop at Sam's. Enjoy Biscotti and Pretzels, and the occluded 4-pounds container of animal crackers. My mirror is apparently dirty (I can't see that from my chair), and there is a garden gnome on top of my television.
-Jeff

[Ritz S14]

Setting your ISO at 100 will give you clearer pics. Read the manual.. And you suck if you use the "auto" settings.

Oh yeah. Resize is key.

[zero.counter]

If there was better lighting and no flash, I am sure the pics would have come out better looking. Great buy however!

[Jeff240sx]

I'm not taking tripod pics where I spend 10 minutes setting up the shot. I'm using the auto setting, with my miserable house lighting, and taking pics of the threads on my couch.
I resized them for you. And that's not noise on the couch.. it's the actual stitching.
-Jeff

[Ritz S14]

If you read the manual... it wouldn't take ten minutes. :loco: :kiss:

[nrg]

not bad.. You have alot of learning to do.
What made you choose this camera anyways? there are tons of better camera (IMO) for the same price.

[jsr20det]

not bad.. You have alot of learning to do.
What made you choose this camera anyways? there are tons of better camera (IMO) for the same price.

Was gonna say the same thing.

Read the manual over and over. Work with those settings, cause those quality pictures can be taken with my 3.2mp sony.

[elevator]

As Napoleon Dynamite says, "Lucky!"