PDA

View Full Version : Counterstrike vs. Counterstrike Source


HyperTek
02-02-2005, 05:53 PM
man i just got into a fued with this girl. I dont know why people perfer the old one to the new one?? The graphics are suxors now, and the controls feel like crap after playing source.... anyone agree with me? or do they perfer teh simplicity of the first one?

cali240sxdrifter
02-02-2005, 06:50 PM
I'd take Counter-Strike PreBeta 1 anyday

bobafett
02-02-2005, 07:12 PM
7 point was better than anything else but i like source better than 1 point +

mrmephistopheles
02-02-2005, 07:30 PM
yeah i used to play 1.4/5 a while back, and I've gotten into playing source now.. tried going back to 6 and it SUCKS.

G_Fish240
02-02-2005, 10:02 PM
Once you play source, you can never go back. I play source about everyday but I have friends that still have 1.6, everyone I go play with them it almost makes me sick. css > 1.6, cpl is source so everyone should move on already

KoukiMonster
02-03-2005, 03:31 AM
i used to have hl2 and source.


i got banned though. and i bought that shit too. probably when cal moves over to source then ill buy source again.

if you guys know what cal is i am cal-im quality for 1.6, w00ttt

SimpleSexy180
02-03-2005, 10:20 AM
i prefer source, the only reason i believe people dont like source is because it doesnt feel the same but i love it so fuc* them :).

THANK YOU COME AGAIN...

DaPCWiz
02-03-2005, 11:23 AM
Personally I like the feel and graphics of souce better, but I miss alot of the maps from 1.6 and prior :(

mrmephistopheles
02-03-2005, 04:11 PM
yeah, that's about the biggest thing about Source that sucks.. there's only a handful of nice maps... With 1.x, you had a HUGE selection of maps.

G_Fish240
02-03-2005, 05:21 PM
yeah, that's about the biggest thing about Source that sucks.. there's only a handful of nice maps... With 1.x, you had a HUGE selection of maps.
Its getting there,
and cpl > cal ;)

prophet_19
02-03-2005, 05:30 PM
i Like the old one but there is too many cheaters out there now.

tonesdefae86
02-03-2005, 06:23 PM
souce is better mostly hackers like 1.6 and 1.5 becuase its the easiest to hack on imo. also the grapics suck and steam 1.5 and 1.6 had some many probs on my comp

01SaturnL200
02-03-2005, 10:36 PM
1.6 > source

HyperTek
02-04-2005, 01:12 AM
man.. i feel depressed when i play an old game now.. esp old cs. ..

Offtopic- woooohooo 1.31 patch released for farcry and some map packs!! im playin the multiplayer, which I feel is alot better then HL2 deathmatch. Its nice to get away from cs sometimes.

infinitexsound
02-04-2005, 01:19 AM
eh its been 2 years since i played cs.......or any pc or ps2 game... just waiting for gt4.... so whats new with the new cs? ppl still runnin clans and all? i use to remember when lan parties was the shit...

SimpleSexy180
02-04-2005, 09:25 AM
^ its the same since when u played :)

KA24DESOneThree
02-04-2005, 01:15 PM
Screw CS. Battlefield or bust, especially DC Final with admins in the server.

Var
02-04-2005, 01:53 PM
The old versions dont even compare to Source. There is NO comparison. None. I wish i had 2 things i could compare. That way there could be a debate. Source owns.

Whiplash Willy
02-04-2005, 07:38 PM
Comparing 1.6 and source is like comparing shit and chocolate. ;)

tokesĀ¹
02-05-2005, 12:19 AM
can you bhop in source yet?

ICKY
02-05-2005, 12:23 AM
I like Condition Zero over all of them. I find it harder to get headshots in Condition Zero. I still play 1.6 and Condition Zero, but CZ is definately better. I never played source tho.