PDA

View Full Version : Digital Camcorders, what to get?


West
10-31-2004, 11:34 PM
So its time we get a digital camcorder. I am not sure what I want or need so I wanted to see what you guys suggest.

I like the Idea of the DVD-R built into the camcorder. However, I'm not sure how long it takes to transfer video to a computer via Firewire. Would I be better off getting a more feature packed digital camcorder vs. a DVD-R type camcorder?

There are a few DVD camcorders on ebay for about $550, which is more than I wanted to spend. I’d like to keep the price well below $550, so given that price range and what’s on the market now, what would everyone suggest I look into?

crioten
10-31-2004, 11:58 PM
dvd-r stores stuff in mpeg-2, so sometimes its not compatible with video editing software...they are also limited to real-time, constant bit encoding (usually 1mb/sec) compared to dv camcorders (usually 3.6mb/sec) so video quality isnt as good on dvd-r...

you want something with optical image stabilization, over electronic image stabilization (usually...but sometimes EIS is as good...)

also, the more CCDs (charge-coupled devices) like 3, will usually produce better video quality than one CCD

one more thing to consider....you have to finalize the dvd before you can view it on you computer/tv...that means that once you do that, you cant use it again (and they aint cheap)

West
11-01-2004, 12:01 AM
Well shit, that’s good to know.

Eliminate DVD Type Camcorders from my considerations...

West
11-01-2004, 12:31 AM
What does everyone think of the Cannon Optura 20? Im leaning tword a Cannon thus far...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=20330&item=3848936431&rd=1

Seems damn good for the price...

crioten
11-01-2004, 12:41 AM
best bet is to go to www.cnet.com and check out their editors picks and reviews...

i find them to always be pretty on target (also read the user reviews too...sometimes they add additional input )

i know the canon optura 30 is pretty good, so i imagine the 20 is pretty good as well

mrmephistopheles
11-01-2004, 01:35 AM
Honestly, the next camcorder I get will be something like this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=20333&item=3849836324&rd=1

this is what we have now. I wish we'd waited.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=3339&item=3849013097&rd=1

nocomedown
11-01-2004, 07:58 AM
this is what i have right now:
http://www.samsungusa.com/cgi-bin/nabc/product/b2c_product_detail.jsp?eUser=&prod_id=SC-D107%2fXAA
it's pretty nice...i like the big LCD screen, and it's not overly expensive. the picture quality isn't always the greatest, but it works for filming our fun times here at college.

as far as how much time it takes to transfer a video to computer via firewire, it takes just as long as the video is. basically you just hook the camera up to the computer, press play, and the computer will capture whatever you see on the screen.
(i hope this makes sense...i'm ignorant when it comes to this kinda technology so i don't know all of the terminology)

mrmephistopheles
11-01-2004, 02:54 PM
One could call it. "realtime capture"!

West
11-01-2004, 04:37 PM
Goddamn, you think im rich?

Maybe us mods/admins should post up our XMas wish lists so everyone can send us gifts :)

Jeff240sx
11-01-2004, 04:49 PM
With a $1500 camera, someone better be recording some damn good porn. I know that me playing with dogs can be captured on a $20 VHS-tape camcorder and I'd be happy.
-Jeff

s0ldats
11-02-2004, 01:06 PM
a good camera for general use is the panasonic pv gs200, it is ridiculously compact for a 3ccd camera and is <1000 everywhere.


basically only semi-weak point is mediocre low light focus performance.

Shin_Kudo
11-03-2004, 01:21 AM
I've got a Sharp, cost around 400. Well built, and good all around performance. I've got no complaints.

West
11-03-2004, 02:26 AM
a good camera for general use is the panasonic pv gs200, it is ridiculously compact for a 3ccd camera and is <1000 everywhere.


basically only semi-weak point is mediocre low light focus performance.

I just looked at that one tonight, although out of my price range. Considering the gs120 or 160... cant remember the model.

s0ldats
11-03-2004, 02:50 AM
120's the same except has no manual focus ring on and lower resolution stills. still great video performance.

West
11-03-2004, 03:29 AM
Damn! Just found the GS400. Now if I could dish out 1k$ for a camcorder!

nocomedown
11-03-2004, 07:19 AM
One could call it. "realtime capture"!
if one were so inclined