PDA

View Full Version : Hot off the presses, just wanted to make sure this was seen

Id-
10-28-2004, 12:28 AM
http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20041028-122637-6257r.htm

Has to do with the 377 tons of missing munitions. Funny how the washington post is giving out this report.
crioten
10-28-2004, 09:36 AM
hahha, notice in the article that it says "almost certainly"....even they put quotation marks around it...
KA24DESOneThree
10-28-2004, 11:26 AM
Was that ever a smoking gun?

This explosives thing totally blew up in Kerry's face.
nismo2491
10-28-2004, 02:09 PM
cute. love to hear that our "aliance" with russia lets them give out nukes to third world countries.
KEvin
sykikchimp
10-28-2004, 02:21 PM
Can you freaking believe Guliani blamed the lost explosives on our troops?
West
10-28-2004, 03:29 PM
Can you freaking believe Guliani blamed the lost explosives on our troops?

As did Kerry...
RJF
10-28-2004, 04:05 PM
Can you freaking believe Guliani blamed the lost explosives on our troops?

:bs:

Provide your sources if you are going to publish "Democratic" facts.
Xren17
10-28-2004, 04:32 PM
Here is a link to where Guliani blames the troop. Yes it's partially the troops fault but the blame is ultimately on those in authority.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20041028/pl_usnw/kerry_campaign__guiliani_blames_troops_for_missing _explosives__video_of_guiliani_denigrating_troops1 38_xml
RJF
10-29-2004, 07:47 AM
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20041028-115519-3700r.htm

Also, look at the last paragraph on the first page of IAEA report.

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/alqaqaa_documents.pdf
sykikchimp
10-29-2004, 09:38 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/29/politics/29bomb.html?ei=5065&en=9b3f4b6995f82009&ex=1099627200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print&position=

According to VIDEO TAPE the explosives where still there when the 101st got there.

OOOOPPSS!!! OEH NOES!!

Just accept it. Your oh so precious comander in cheif LIES TO YOU constantly and always shifts blame.
RJF
10-29-2004, 10:45 AM
Yeah, but we have them. :rawk:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,137017,00.html
evilimport
10-29-2004, 05:05 PM
Yes, but that commander, in Iraq, should've stepped forward about this a week ago....
KA24DESOneThree
10-29-2004, 06:11 PM
Guiliani does not blame the troops. He just points out the fact that the President is not the one who should be getting the brunt of the blame. Anyway, what blame is there to get? That New York Times story is written so that the "facts" contained therein may not be facts at all. "Videotape appears identical" does not mean it is identical. "Many of the containers are marked "explosive" does not mean they contain HMX or RDX. "Apparently left unguarded" means nothing. "'Al Qaqaa, the official said, "was not controlled for three weeks after the I.A.E.A. left," and added "there are a lot of dots we have to connect." Where is the smoking gun? "'The damning thing is the seals. The Iraqis didn't use seals on anything. So I'm absolutely sure that's an I.A.E.A. seal.'" Wow, imagine that the Iraqis use a seal on one of the most powerful convential explosives... wouldn't that seem smart? I mean, sure they were evil, but I doubt they wanted to blow themselves up.
sykikchimp
10-30-2004, 07:24 AM
KA24... your reaching. They said when compared to the previos photos, they could have been mistaken for being the same photos. That's pretty freakin close. Not to mention RJF's link to the fox story confirms that it was still there.

Now - I think this stinks from both sides.. The timing of the release of this 4-5 month old story just reeks of political discourse.. but what reeks worse is why Bush and his cohorts can't get their story straight.

One day it's we don't know, and "we're lucky it wasn't more", then the story changes to Russians helping them, then the next day the show photos of trucks outside bunkers which means NOTHING according to white house officials who admit it really has no significant "proof" value. Now all the sudden, after Don Rumsfeld, Colin powell, and his entire administration has no idea what happened, there just so happened to be a whole planned operation to remove and destroy the material? WTF?!? How the hell could at least SOMEONE not know about this. Specific operations like that aren't just made up by officers on the ground. How in the hell did NO ONE controlling the battle front at home know about it? Impossible.

"Hmm, ya know guys.. I was thinkin'.. No one else is taking care of these explosives and stuff.. Why don't we form a little sub group, and go secure all this stuff? we can call it 'Task Force Bullet'. Sound cool to you guys? cool."

...I don't think so.