PDA

View Full Version : Bush vs. Kerry (whoever wins, we lose)

dplxy
10-01-2004, 06:54 PM
http://multigraphic.dk/lounge/weblog/images/uploads/alien-vs-predator.jpg

http://multigraphic.dk/lounge/weblog/images/uploads/kerry-versus-bush.jpg
Sanchi
10-01-2004, 07:03 PM
HAHAH good one i like the KVB
evilimport
10-01-2004, 08:34 PM
HAHAHA funnt shit fo' sho'!
FastBack 240
10-01-2004, 09:20 PM
this is true.
fastbacchris
10-02-2004, 04:02 AM
id go kerry because bush it the devil!
FastBack 240
10-02-2004, 11:48 AM
^ great answer.
AlligatorBling
10-02-2004, 03:39 PM
this guy should run for office. hell, id vote for him

http://www.bumfights.com/indecline/pics/9.jpg
RJF
10-02-2004, 04:05 PM
This is really what the election is about.

http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm
Sanchi
10-02-2004, 05:01 PM
Thanks RJF that was a great link. First minute i was thinking this is corny... but it wasent. Thanks for the link!!
RJF
10-02-2004, 09:12 PM
Sanchi - Your signature is one of my favorite quotes ever. I even have a variation that relates to this election.
fastpace
10-02-2004, 09:19 PM
Rufus for President!!!!!!!!!
SilviaNinja240
10-03-2004, 12:50 AM
Speaking of Star Wars..
http://www.uiowa.edu/~policult/bush/bushgallery/image/Coming_soon.jpg
FastBack 240
10-03-2004, 12:58 AM
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/jdejager/osamawantsu.jpg
evilimport
10-03-2004, 01:04 AM
RJF - GREAT link!!

SilviaNinja - Old, but funny none the less!

Fastback - Absolutely classic!
legin2
10-03-2004, 09:00 AM
This is really what the election is about.

http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm


that was very sweet! :bigok:
FastBack 240
10-03-2004, 10:41 AM
great link RJF
Sanchi
10-03-2004, 11:56 AM
RJF your pix much better suits our current president if you ask me. He use's fear on his own people to get things done. And ohh boy is there alot of hate, and who is suffering right now... everyone somehow.

But here is one of my favorite's!

http://home.earthlink.net/~lonewolve/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/bush_011503_01.jpg
FastBack 240
10-03-2004, 07:47 PM
Its going to be comical watching Cheney and Edwards debate. I think I know who will win that one hands down.
KA24DESOneThree
10-03-2004, 11:24 PM
I'm just waiting for Cheney to say "Shut the fck up you hospital-suing, insurance-premium-raising con artist." on live national television.
sykikchimp
10-04-2004, 05:43 AM
I'm just waiting for Cheney to say "Shut the fck up you hospital-suing, insurance-premium-raising con artist." on live national television.


hahaha.. I seriously wouldn't put it past him.

Sanchi - watch out.. now that you've implied that bush could somehow be bad, YOU are the terrorist.
Phlip
10-04-2004, 07:25 AM
hahaha.. I seriously wouldn't put it past him.

Sanchi - watch out.. now that you've implied that bush could somehow be bad, YOU are the terrorist.
Now that you mention it, I was shocked didn't jump from his podium and force Kerry to beat the fuck outta him in self defense... Dick Cheney, on the other hand, is the embodiment of evil, let Edwards get the upper hand on him and he will peel back the mask and go Skeletor on him, right there live on national TV.
MakotoS13
10-04-2004, 07:38 AM
haha that'd own the world
sykikchimp
10-04-2004, 10:31 AM
And since skeletor leaves no survivors, we would only be left with Ralph Nader to vote for..

hmm.... interesting predicament.
RJF
10-04-2004, 11:03 AM
How children are being "trained" by the left.

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/news/WABC_100304_middleschoolteacher.html

Why would Kerry's picture be placed on that bulletin board? He's not a President and hopefully never will be.
sykikchimp
10-04-2004, 11:37 AM
How children are being "trained" by the left.

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/news/WABC_100304_middleschoolteacher.html

Why would Kerry's picture be placed on that bulletin board? He's not a President and hopefully never will be.

I would also be outraged at the actions of that school. He IS the president, and as such should be placed along side all the rest of them. Children should indeed know who their president is.

But to try and somehow allude to this being the normal way of things for democrats is dispicable. Hopefully the "right" can get over their paranoia, and not view EVERYTHING as an attack.
RJF
10-04-2004, 11:41 AM
http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=\SpecialReports\archiv e\200410\SPE20041004a.html


Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
By Scott Wheeler
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
October 04, 2004

EXCERPT

(CNSNews.com) - Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by U.S. forces and obtained by CNSNews.com, show numerous efforts by Saddam Hussein's regime to work with some of the world's most notorious terror organizations, including al Qaeda, to target Americans. They demonstrate that Saddam's government possessed mustard gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction, in the summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations weapons inspectors were not present in Iraq. And the papers show that Iraq trained dozens of terrorists inside its borders.

One of the Iraqi memos contains an order from Saddam for his intelligence service to support terrorist attacks against Americans in Somalia. The memo was written nine months before U.S. Army Rangers were ambushed in Mogadishu by forces loyal to a warlord with alleged ties to al Qaeda.

Other memos provide a list of terrorist groups with whom Iraq had relationships and considered available for terror operations against the United States.
Among the organizations mentioned are those affiliated with Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Ayman al-Zawahiri, two of the world's most wanted terrorists. Zarqawi is believed responsible for the kidnapping and beheading of several American civilians in Iraq and claimed responsibility for a series of deadly bombings in Iraq Sept. 30. Al-Zawahiri is the top lieutenant of al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden, allegedly helped plan the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist strikes on the U.S., and is believed to be the voice on an audio tape broadcast by Al-Jazeera television Oct. 1, calling for attacks on U.S. and British interests everywhere.
Phlip
10-04-2004, 11:55 AM
And since skeletor leaves no survivors, we would only be left with Ralph Nader to vote for..

hmm.... interesting predicament.
Exactly the point I make... Wait, Condoleeza Rice won't be there, neither will Hillary Clinton, they will take the reins and run for Pres/Vice pres, they will then succeed in taking over the earth with Dick Cheney- ... err... Skeletor as their muscle
sykikchimp
10-04-2004, 12:19 PM
umm.. no ones debating that we shouldn't have attacked and removed Hussein from power. The problem comes in the execution, and lack of planning.

Everyone knows Saddam had chemical weapons at one point or another. (especially in 1993 when that document was written.) And everyone knows he hated the "infidels" as much as any arab nation. And 2000 was a year before sept,11, and 2 years before we voted to go into Iraq. Terrorist ties change like the wind from the reports I've read on the subject. Just like Zawhiri was a small time terrorist just a couple years ago, and from other sources I've read (can't remember) he was actually against Osama bin laden at one point.

We still haven't found any WMD, and we still haven't found ties to al-queda except some completely ambiguous sources sited by an internet news site. At least make the supposed documents available to the public so that other independent analysts can confirm their authenticity.
RJF
10-04-2004, 03:18 PM
umm.. no ones debating that we shouldn't have attacked and removed Hussein from power. The problem comes in the execution, and lack of planning.

So, according to your logic, WWII was a total failure? MrMeph quoted stats from just the Battle of the Bulge, where 19,000 Americans died over a several week period and the reason was an offensive by the Germans. Should we have seen that attack coming? Why wasn't Eisenhower fired and FDR criticized in the media?
SilviaNinja240
10-04-2004, 03:45 PM
There's a big difference between WWII and 'the war on terror'. Nazi Germany was a nation state with a military, economy and a means of production. However, terrorism is a bit more complicated due to the fact that its stateless, with no national army. Terrorism can't be about absolute victory or unconditional surrender, World War II style. It's about containment, simular to the cold war. There will always be animosity towards a world hegemon, due to conflicts in expanding markets and globalization, and there will always be someone who will blow themselves up fighting for the cause. Trying to do away with terrorism is like trying to do away with hatered, and that's impossible, thus the US will be fighting a never ending war.
Phlip
10-04-2004, 05:32 PM
^^^ And with that, ladies and gentlemen, we will not refer to it as "the war on terror" we must refer to it as what it really is: "the libel campaign against malicious intent"
Sanchi
10-04-2004, 05:48 PM
^^^ haha good one

hahaha.. I seriously wouldn't put it past him.

Sanchi - watch out.. now that you've implied that bush could somehow be bad, YOU are the terrorist.


DOH!! :ughd:
evilimport
10-06-2004, 04:50 AM
blah, blah, blah..... and we still haven't found ties to al-queda except some completely ambiguous sources sited by an internet news site. At least make the supposed documents available to the public so that other independent analysts can confirm their authenticity.
no ties to Al Queda, eh?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1005579/posts
SilviaNinja240
10-06-2004, 12:53 PM
as I said in my last post:
"yack, yack, yack.. such uncredable right wing sources, suprised nobody has quoted rush limbaugh yet"
It's easier to pursue a truth you want to believe rather than the reality of the matter.
RJF
10-06-2004, 12:57 PM
as I said in my last post:
"yack, yack, yack.. such uncredable right wing sources, suprised nobody has quoted rush limbaugh yet"
It's easier to pursue a truth you want to believe rather than the reality of the matter.

And the reality is being reported by the MSM? :bowrofl:
SilviaNinja240
10-06-2004, 01:15 PM
Nope, the best way to research the topic would be to gather news data from multiple news sources from both sides of the American political spectrum and international news, if your'e constantly researching in freerepublic, Fox news, bushblog (which isn't even news), drudge, etc.. your'e going to get a sqewed perspective of what is really going on.