PDA

View Full Version : Today's Test Drive! S2000 and WRX


nismo270r
01-15-2002, 09:56 PM
I would have to say I had two of the most fun test drives today I've ever been on...besides the SE-R Spec V we tore the #### out of. :biggrin:  Here goes...

'02 WRC Blue WRX:

This is the first car we drove.  A bud of mine drove first, then me, then Rob (KoukiS14).  I would have to say the WRX is one helluva car for the money.  If I had to buy a sedan, it'd be a WRX.  For the price it spanks on the new Altima V6, but then again, the Altima is a different kind of car.  The WRX we drove had a factory short shifter with STI titanium knob, and the steering wheel column mounted boost gauge.  The boost gauge looked kind of cheap to me, with a wire loom running down into the console.  I would much rather lose the clock on the dash and get the 3 gauge cluster.  We took the WRX up through a twisty section of road we always take test drives and our own cars through to see how it handled...It impressed the #### outta me...For 4 guys weighing the car down, it didn't have much body roll for a stock suspension.  And you can't beat the sound a turbo boxer engine makes...:)  Brakes could have been better I thought, but not to shabby for stock.  A very fun car to drive, and something I may consider as a daily driver later...

'00 New Formula Red S2000 (26k Miles):

I don't know what the #### is wrong with the magazine people writing reviews on this car, but OMFG...AMAZING!  I don't understand where they get off saying it doesn't have any power down low for around town driving, etc.  You could leave the thing in 3rd and cruise around all day.  9000RPM redline absolutely SCREAMS!!  If you ever get the chance to drive one, don't bother turning on the stereo...the music from the engine is plentiful.  The thing handled just as awesome as it accelerated.  Tight suspension and fairly grippy tires for having 26k on them.  Potenza RE92 stockers on it.  Brakes left nothing to be desired, bringing you back down to zero in no time.  I rolled away from a stop light in 1st and punched it...brought it up to 9k, slammed into 2nd floored it again...Oh jeez....I needed a smoke after that test drive.  I must say I think it was much more of a driver's car than the WRX, but the WRX is much more of a practical car.  You can't really compare the two, much less than comparing apples and oranges.  Needless to say...these two drives made it worth getting up early today for...:biggrin:

whateverjames
01-16-2002, 08:59 AM
nice reviews. i'd consider an s2000 if the aftermarket is good. i test drove a 2001 z28 with upgrade gears and exhaust. it was poopy. even with the gears, it was like turbo lag from 1000-2000 rpms in second gear. first gear you do that and as soon as you hit 2000, it's like you're on ice. power is awesome from 2000-3500. after that the power drops off, and it doesn't have much power up top. the handling is bad, it throws you forward when you hit the brakes, and it doesn't feel like a predictable car. after i got in my 240sx, the powerband felt a lot smoother (worn out sohc KA). and the car felt connected to the road. camaros are great straight line cars though

Drifting Ricer
01-16-2002, 05:16 PM
Z28 have turbos?<img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt='???'>?<img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/confused.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt='???'>? 0_o? When did the come with turbos?
NIS:Hey do you work for a magazine nice work man. You actually buying a car or you just stroking around for rides. Shame on you!

LanceS13
01-16-2002, 05:46 PM
No, Z28's don't have turbos.
He said it was like turbo lag below 2000rpm. &nbsp;I guess maybe they have a wild cam or something that kills the low end?

AJ
01-16-2002, 06:11 PM
whateverjames.. the lt1's have better top end than the ls1's... and i tend to disagree with the rest of ur comments as well.. though i haven't driving on with stock suspension.. the gears were stock.. and that thing has pickup from 1000 rpms through the whole rpm range.. it was a ls1, which has a VERy even torque band, but my friend wants to swap an lt1.. so there has to be something right about it.. &nbsp;All i know is it outcornered my car, and accelerated like a bat outa ####.. the wheel hop was shitty on bad roads.. but without independant rear suspension, that is to be expected... well,, those r my thoughts anyway,, if i want a car to go fast for no money.. z28's r the be all end all.

nismo270r
01-16-2002, 06:45 PM
HAHA...I need to get a job with Car and Driver or something doing reviews...LOL. Not buyin' anything...just BS'in around for some phat ass test drives...Check out my new thread:

<a href="http://www.zilvia.net/forum/topic.cgi?forum=1&topic=2156" target='_blank'>http://www.zilvia.net/forum/topic.cgi?forum=1&amp;topic=2156</a>

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from Drifting Ricer on 7:16 pm on Jan. 16, 2002
NIS:Hey do you work for a magazine nice work man. You actually buying a car or you just stroking around for rides. Shame on you!
</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>

whateverjames
01-16-2002, 06:48 PM
yeah, the z28 does have power from 1000, just in second gear it felt like it wouldn't want to move at all, if i was at about 1500. but like i said in first gear, after 2000 it was like the rear wheels where on ice! lots o low end. it's not a bad engine. but i dunno. i know what i felt, and that thing had no power up high like it did down low, and it was annoying. nothing a cam couldn't fix though. my car has a suspension upgrade so i guess it wasn't fair comparing it to the camaro, but it could have been better for a new car.