PDA

View Full Version : dont get it?


djaztek12
09-03-2011, 01:38 PM
hey guys i'm new to the forum and the 240's. I Just got my first 1995 240sx and the previous owner had 225/40/18 tires in the front and 265/35/in the back. i thought it was better to have the bigger tire in the back? should i keep it like that or go 40's all the way around?:facepalm:

stinky_180
09-03-2011, 01:55 PM
huh? lol!

Tire Tech Information - Tire Size Guide (http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=46)

One_love_silvia
09-03-2011, 02:15 PM
its the width not the height that matters. tho it probably looks retarded with larger tires in the front.

Jay420sx
09-03-2011, 02:18 PM
225/40/18 tires in the front and 265/35/18 in the back

Bigger tires are in the rear (width wise), just your fronts have a little bit more of sidewall, only 5mm or something like that IIRC.

LOUD240
09-03-2011, 03:03 PM
225/4018 225mm wide 40= 40% of the width measurement

djaztek12
09-03-2011, 04:00 PM
is that a drift thing? the owner b4 me use to go canyon driving

Karlitos
09-03-2011, 04:08 PM
Go read up on tire sizing. The 225/40's are narrower but have a taller sidewall relative to its width. The 265/35 is a lot WIDER but to make the height look even with the fronts they chose a "shorter" sidewall. I think 245/35 are the ones with the most similar height to 225 but IDR.

And no, its not a drift thing, staggering is usually in RWD vehicles to get the most traction out of the wheels putting down the power.

djaztek12
09-03-2011, 04:18 PM
ok thanks:facepalm:

sw20>>s14
09-03-2011, 04:23 PM
zilvia HAS gone soft......

Dunkz
09-03-2011, 04:37 PM
he does have the bigger tyre at the back though, 35% of 265 is more than 40% of 225. :)

nismo 240sx
09-03-2011, 04:45 PM
you should of stuck to you honda! posably had to do with wheel fitmet to make the tire fit.. or that how he felt more comfortable driving threw the canyon..