some kind of minimum intelligence requirement should be enacted...

[Warwick5s]

if you decide to make a website you should probably know what the hell you are talking about.

for example:

http://www.toyota-supra-pics.com/


whomever can find the most errors on that page wins an e-cookie.

[KiDyNomiTe]

well if you mean the celica supra part, there are some supras called celica supras that were in production IIRC, this is way back.

[Warwick5s]

oh yeah - i know the mk1 and mk2's were lengthened celica bodies.


but the mk4?


Toyota Supra MK4
The last of the Supras was very similar to the Celica that it was based on, though bigger single lights, side air vents and an outrageous spoiler set it apart.


and that pic of the mk1 is definitely a mk3.

[Thrill Capsule]

WOW, truely an idiot. Hes way off with the "MKI" and picture deal.

MKIII's and MKIV's were not based on the celica platform at all...

Edit: cursed spelling...

[Baka Sama]

WTF Is up with that site??
I use to own a MKII Supra.. It was a 86 right before the new body styles of the MKIII. I loved that car but the hood was so freakin long. Yeh it was a celica-supra, and had the supra logo across the back end. Anyway this site looks like some idiot wants the show the world how little he knows about supras... I feel sorry for him when he comes back to his own site after a few months of learning about supras.. Hes gonna feel.. well like this... :bash:

[Sabertooth]

Originally posted by Warwick5s
if you decide to make a website you should probably know what the hell you are talking about.

crack-cocaine

[method2833]

:bs: thats all i half to say about that

[Phlip]

I don't think his approach to it was as wrong as his execution of it... I personally always thought that the last supra resembled the celica a little, but I could never be stupid enough to say that the only differences were cosmetic as he seems to be doing here. For that, he gets :hammer:

[Steeles]

yeha that guy needs one of these:

http://www.zilvia.net/f/blued2/top_search.gif