Your fav hdr pics

[drftwerks]

post em here

[mrmephistopheles]

Not going to post your favorites?

Some that I've done:

http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/2730/newhdr3imagesmr7.jpg

http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/9647/duskcy4.jpg

http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/452/fakehdrgu7.jpg

http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/6144/1218sd5.jpg

[C. Senor]

for those of us that are a little slow....mainly me. what does hdr stand for?

[drftwerks]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/New_York_City_at_night_HDR.jpg/800px-New_York_City_at_night_HDR.jpg

[mrmephistopheles]

for those of us that are a little slow....mainly me. what does hdr stand for?

High Dynamic Range. Google if you 'd like to know more.

[drftwerks]

ya unfortunately i dont have a camera capable of it so i can only look online for them

[C. Senor]

^i did. that's pretty cool. honestly didnt know you could do stuff like that. seems like a lot of work, but the end product is simply amazing. that 1st and last pic from mrmeph are dope as hell. as well as that city picture.

[SNC240SX]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3028/3050939761_c17aa17d21_o.jpg

[yokotas13]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2043/1979844751_a2a1f632f3.jpg

[Jakob]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2142/1786699724_2b15ba4763.jpg

[lucky7]

i havnt done any HDR's in a long time it seems. but heres some that i've done.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3020/2332422148_df4dc14301_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2256/2338902581_4d34b365cc_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3094/2351740694_7ec67832a7_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2348/2174268296_312e30a6e4_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2168/2178612989_14c53a0197_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2257/2143655771_f50e4e47fb_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2215/2163036229_27312b123f_b.jpg

HDR's are cool. i just got a little burned out. i havnt been shooting much lately. too busy with work and school. i shoul have some time in january to go shooting again. its been so long.

[lucky7]

LOL, i almost forgot. this was one of the first ones i'd ever done. so i oversaturated the SHIT out of it. lol.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2013/2132031866_1f4796d3a0_b.jpg

merry x-mas, '07.

[HalveBlue]

I have an HDR of Hong Kong that I took off wikipedia set as my background.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/Hong_Kong_Night_Skyline.jpg

LOL @ Christmas tree.

This is what I said about it the first time I saw the picture. I still stand by it.

"That first picture is totally bad ass.

It just screams, "Hey, I'm a fucking Christmas Tree. What are you gonna do about it?"

[lflkajfj12123]

^ some one has got to be doing the deed in one of those windows

[jamben]

dang nice pics.. lucky7

[lucky7]

^ some one has got to be doing the deed in one of those windows

its china. i think thats illegal or something. :wiggle:

dang nice pics.. lucky7

thank you.

mas HDR pixers.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2278/2181840639_1717d74610_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2122/2139871618_2065883897_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2283/2139811320_c6920a8575_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2224/2166812653_750357be51_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2075/2167623660_c7592876ba_b.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2233/2170798950_df1d819254_b.jpg

this is actually an HDR, turned blk/white. took it on mackinac island last january. took a small airplane to the island. since there are no cars on the island, we walked everywhere. and we drank plenty.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2284/2192880033_d817693e50_b.jpg

st. agnes, detroit. beautiful old building. unfortunately scrappers and such have broken in and stolen everything. im sure its in much worse shape now.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2165/2183694919_b947c90304_b.jpg

in my backyard last year. water droplets on the lens kinda ruined it. but i really like the placement of the sun.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2114/2251674628_88b0af7ba7_b.jpg

this one is kind of interesting.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3076/2648859250_830ce897cd_b.jpg

fisher body. this place is no more. it is completely sealed off now, and heavily guarded.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2329/2174268312_b0cfe7f96e_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3164/2648030867_bdc0051107_b.jpg

ill leave it at that. i could add many more. maybe another time. i dont want to completely jack the thread. :bow:

[Pank]

ya unfortunately i dont have a camera capable of it so i can only look online for them

every camera is capable of it

[lucky7]

anybody else?

[driftking777]

i did some to screw around but downloaded a free copy of photomatrix. and they added watermarks to it...i can still post them anywho though...

[driftking777]

First one i've ever done..saw this thread during the snow storm and decided to try it. Really want to try out some scenery shots though.

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d190/driftking777/Misc/Kitchen.jpg

BTW lucky7 i tried to take you inadvertent advice and not over saturate...so thats what i came up with..

...my original was over sat. and everything poped like crazy..looked cool but not like a real pic

[RUTH'LESSDET]

im curious about this because i took some pics with a canon xsi the other day of my car but i was messing around in photoshop CS :adjustment, "highlights and shadows" and created this:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/ruthlessdet/flushing%20meadow%2012%2007%2008/IMG_0174.jpg
is this considered hdr? yes im a noob to this go easy with me

[driftking777]

not 100% sure, but HDR is a style of editing that requires you to take 3-5 pics and combine them.

[Pank]

im curious about this because i took some pics with a canon xsi the other day of my car but i was messing around in photoshop CS :adjustment, "highlights and shadows" and created this:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v481/ruthlessdet/flushing%20meadow%2012%2007%2008/IMG_0174.jpg
is this considered hdr? yes im a noob to this go easy with me

no, thats not HDR
HDR Photography: What is High Dynamic Range? » i Digital Photo (http://www.idigitalphoto.com/high-dynamic-range-photography-explained/)
take different pictures exposing for the main elements of the scene (sky, lit buildings, shadows) and the combine so the image has the most detail, but sometimes a lack of contrast.

[RUTH'LESSDET]

no, thats not HDR
HDR Photography: What is High Dynamic Range? » i Digital Photo (http://www.idigitalphoto.com/high-dynamic-range-photography-explained/)
take different pictures exposing for the main elements of the scene (sky, lit buildings, shadows) and the combine so the image has the most detail, but sometimes a lack of contrast.
So after you take the different type of pictures this is all put together in a photo edit program correct??thanx for the info

[theronin]

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1366/752319396_5a15216b65.jpg?v=0


The Heart of Satan.

[driftking777]

^^correct.

[kingkilburn]

Does some one want to compile some photos photos for me? If so I can post them up.

[driftking777]

sure post the 3 pics (they are with different ISO settings correct?)

[kingkilburn]

Ya
Removed because my pics fail.

[driftking777]

*edit*

Couldnt do it, you either A) didnt take the picture with a tripod (kinda required) or B) moved the original position the tripod was at so the pic is in a different spot. F's up the image.

sorry man.

[driftking777]

btw...if you take the pics again, make sure the ISO is at a decent different (exeptionaly dark and light) it had issues with the little difference in ISO settings on your camera

[MikeisNissan]

what are the best bang for the buck for these types of cameras?

[i-love-my-s14]

I've always like this one of my s2k, but you'll have to excuse the watermarks on the picture. I'm still to cheap to buy the full version of the software, but hey free is free, I guess I am still a 240 owner at heart.


http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b218/robs14/HDR-AptParkinglot.jpg

[driftking777]

^^ same trial version im using.

Mike, as far as bang for buck cameras go. i would say any mid range, cannon or sony that has 10mp and a decent zoom. However they typically wont have detachable lenses, which is really whats needed to take Fantastic photos (fish-eye's ect.) I personally have a Sony Cybershot DSC-H7. i love the camera, just hate the fact that i cant change out my lenses (however thats what i have my Cannon Rebel 35mm for)

[KA-T_240]

Pics taken by a ex-local. Now lives in So-Cal.
http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg227/TYCPhotography/Misc%20Photography/HorseShoeBend.jpg

http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg227/TYCPhotography/Car%20Photography/North%20Dakota%20Photoshoot/AJ/A1.jpg

[95KA-Turbo]

First I must say...I had no idea Michigan was that amazing looking! I am sure it helps when there is someone who knows how to take good fucking pictures operating the camera.


Here are two I've done....I haven't really had the best luck with HDRs at all and usually end up editing them more after the merge. I got a new lens for Christmas though and plan on going and trying to find some new places to take some shots at.



Friend's old car:

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c51/95KA-Turbo/James8.jpg


My car from about a year ago:

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c51/95KA-Turbo/12-2-0710.png

[Pank]

^^ same trial version im using.

Mike, as far as bang for buck cameras go. i would say any mid range, cannon or sony that has 10mp and a decent zoom. However they typically wont have detachable lenses, which is really whats needed to take Fantastic photos (fish-eye's ect.) I personally have a Sony Cybershot DSC-H7. i love the camera, just hate the fact that i cant change out my lenses (however thats what i have my Cannon Rebel 35mm for)

the last thing you should be doing is basing a camera on how many mega pixels it has.

You can pick up 10d's and rebel/rebelXT DSLRs for under 300 dollars these days, which will run circles around a 400 dollar point and shoot.

all you need is a camera with manual controls, or at the very least, a way to adjust EV settings. thats it, theres no special camera you need to buy.

btw...if you take the pics again, make sure the ISO is at a decent different (exeptionaly dark and light) it had issues with the little difference in ISO settings on your camera

ok, you really need to stop giving out bad advice. You dont need to change your ISO. In fact, if you're on a tripod and not using a flash, its recommended that you use the lowest ISO possible for the best quality image. all you need to change is the exposure. Most of the time, its beneficial to leave the iso as low as possible, leave the f/stop the same, and change the shutter speed, so the depth of field or image quality isn't different through the 3 or 5 or 13 or whatever exposures it takes.

also, bracketing is 90% of the time not going to give you the best HDR. metering for the scene elements seperately is what you need to do.

also the 3 picture series he posted is easily saved, just some cropping, the angles are all close enough to make it work

[TheSquidd]

Every photography thread on this forum reminds me of how shitty I am of a photographer.

I can't shoot anything BUT cars. And alpacas.

Probably the only HDR's I've ever done:

http://violentrunning.squidd.org/galleries/d/25266-7/Untitled_HDR2.jpg

http://violentrunning.squidd.org/galleries/d/24792-9/Untitled_HDR1.jpg

And the now WORLD FAMOUS
http://violentrunning.squidd.org/galleries/d/29927-3/Untitled_HDR2.jpg

I can't shoot people, or buildings, or plants, or anything. I suck. grrr.

[Pank]

http://violentrunning.squidd.org/galleries/d/29927-3/Untitled_HDR2.jpg


thats an HDR? damn
That whole series you shot of that car was nice, i thought you either setup strobes or got the best lit parking deck on the planet

[Bubbles]

i havnt done any HDR's in a long time it seems. but heres some that i've done.



I like both of your sets.

Keep it up.



One of these days I'll quit procrastinating and attempt to learn how to use a proper camera.

[driftking777]

ok, you really need to stop giving out bad advice. You dont need to change your ISO. k

done...I was just giving the advice that the editor game me. Im new to the game. thanks for your advice however. iI'll practice with that.

[kingkilburn]

Not mine just some that I like.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1278/695622081_453903a07c_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3131/2854411894_f4baa95755_b.jpg
http://slughappy.com/wp-content/gallery/1440x900%20-%20wallpaperstock.net/ws_Tank_HDR_1440x900.jpg
http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs20/f/2007/272/0/c/Chicago_HDR_02_by_delobbo.jpg

[punxva]

here's one of my favorites i did, it was kinda impromptu but i over saturated it a little too much.

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c28/punxva/Chrishdr.jpg

[Pank]

Not mine just some that I like.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1278/695622081_453903a07c_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3131/2854411894_f4baa95755_b.jpg
http://slughappy.com/wp-content/gallery/1440x900%20-%20wallpaperstock.net/ws_Tank_HDR_1440x900.jpg
http://fc01.deviantart.com/fs20/f/2007/272/0/c/Chicago_HDR_02_by_delobbo.jpg

the shitty thing about HDR, and this is a perfect post to illustrate it, is that NONE of those pictures would stand alone, without the hdr (which i dont even think the beetle picture is).
the tree is composed boringly, the tank is horribly blurry and about 10 degrees tilted, and the skyline shot has someones jacket covering up the bottom right corner. But since "the colors are all pretty" and "it looks neat" people overlook it.

siiiiigh

[kingkilburn]

I noticed that to. Most of the time the pics are to blurry with only ok composition.

[drftwerks]

can some one properly hdr convert the following pic

http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff59/lowenbroke/buggirl.jpg

thanks

[punxva]

you cant really do it without 3 exposures at least one over one under and one properly

[drftwerks]

ok nvm then, just some eye candy.

[lucky7]

right, you need to take ATLEAST 2 photos of the same thing. different exposures. dont change the iso, dont change the aperture, dont move the camera, dont do anything but change the shutter speed. you shoot -2 or even -3 stops sometimes, and it increases the shutter speed. thus making all the dark parts REALLY dark, but making the bright areas exposed correctly, IE teh sky. then take one at the 0 mark. putting whatever it is you are focusing on, at the correct exposure. your darks will still be too dark, and your brights will still be too bright. then you take one at +2 or +3. slowing down the shutter speed. this will make your brights blown out and white. but what you're after, is getting all the dark areas and shadows to expose correctly. merge them all together, and you will see detail in the bright areas [skk], detail in the dark areas [shadows], and ofcourse the stuff in the middle will also be in detail. then you tonemap them and dick around with the settings.

i use a tripod. a STURDY one. no cheap shit, or wind will mess up your shit. use a timer (i use a remote so i dont get any movement in the camera/tripod). take your pictures. i usually take up to 7 shots. -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3. then i merge them together in photomatix. sometimes your highlights will still be blown out, and i will take the time to re-do the entire image. taking out the brightest or the darkest if i need to. really bright, and you will get purple/white spots that are hard to get rid of. too dark and you get alot of noise. trying to correct alot of noise, will result in blurry shit. it takes some time and plenty of practice to get it right. my advice, once you get the shot frames, and the focus correct, switch it to manual focus, so nothing changes. this is important. (dont forget to switch it back to auto focus before your next set of shots!! ive done this countless times, and it pisses me off when i get home!!!)

when i tonemap, i usually decrease the gamma (gamma makes your shit look faaaake!), increase the blacks a little bit. this gives more contrast, but at the same time it takes away detail in your dark areas [shadows]. sometimes ill bump up the whites a little if my sky is still blown out. i dont really care if i lose some of the HDR'd detail. as long as i gain in realism, thats my priority.

i have done my fair share of fake looking shit, but over time, i tried like hell to avoid it. heres some examples of what i feel is 'overdone shit'.

belle isle, detroit.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2362/2181852929_464b0e97d7_b.jpg

there was frost on everything, but it looks fake. i should have dropped the gamma and bumped up the blacks. it would have eliminated the 'glow' effect. i still think its decent enough to keep on flickr though. so its there. deal.

fake as fuck, but people seem to like it. i hate it, but whatever.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3017/2720996081_e0e0b0f823_b.jpg

example of what happens when theres a spot thats too bright. look at the bulbs in the light sticking up. its fucking grey/purple. that is data that is just shit on. there is no information to draw detail from. sucks. oh well, i feel the photo is shit to begin with.

top right of the picture. same shit happened. didnt realize till it was too late. fawk. i like the comp, too.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2080/2207561560_d469504eb5_b.jpg

was looking good, till i noticed a SHIT ton of noise in the bottom left. so i darkened it...alot. took away alot of detail, but helped eliminate alot of noise.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2237/2181858949_8f883407cc_b.jpg

the sky is fucked in this one. clouds look like cotton balls.. fail.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2170/2192880013_71b2d4ab43_b.jpg

the look can be mimicked by tonemapping. for example, this is 1 shot. i changed the exposure in CS3 and saved it as a 2nd file. then i merged them in photomatix and tonemapped 'em. not an HDR, it just looks like it.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2154/2160335548_358249d703_b.jpg

too much gamma. but i had to. turning it down made all teh dark areas black blobs. hate it, but others dont. thats why its still on my flickr page. i should delete that bish...
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3092/2557915636_81e5bc41ce_b.jpg

thats all for now. im tired as fuck and have shit to do. hopefully ill be doing alot more shooting in january when i have some time. hopefully i'll get into using my flash alot more. i still dont know what the fuck im doing with that shit.

[Matej]

can some one properly hdr convert the following pic

http://i242.photobucket.com/albums/ff59/lowenbroke/buggirl.jpg
Not HDR but whatevz.
http://www.matejblahut.com/image/auto/vw/gollyjeewillikers.jpg

[TheSquidd]

Fuck I need whatever lens it is that you're using Lucky7. Not that the lens is doing the work to make the photos good, but the perspective on it just make everything look so vast.

[Dutchmalmiss]

Pics taken by a ex-local. Now lives in So-Cal.
http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg227/TYCPhotography/Misc%20Photography/HorseShoeBend.jpg


Holy shit that one looks gorgeous to me. MOAR POSTS PLEASE.

[punxva]

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c28/punxva/jutsin%20and%20chris%20photoshoot/6.jpg

another one i took during a photoshoot with a friends car, i really need to take more exposures and work on them more in photomatix.

[scooby steve33]

i will say this is about 95% subaru content but there are some amazing hdrs in there
Post a "HDR" picture of your Subaru - NASIOC (http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1262516&highlight=hdr+thread)

[Z33dori]

yea i figured out the cheap/fake way to HDR pics last night(pics already taken)

some come out pretty good some don't do anything... and some look lame....

i'll have to find a way to post them up b/c they are on my laptop, and right now i have no wireless or a usb drive... LAME

[Z33dori]

cheapo way

http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j104/Zilvia13/HDRSikky.jpg
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j104/Zilvia13/HDRMDRACER.jpg

[lucky7]

meh. i may try this again tomorrow.. not really feeling it.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3256/3123500639_bc89f37ede_b.jpg

[Z33dori]

looks pretty nice i think....

[andmattsayd]

i found this one on the subaru forums
http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs28/f/2008/065/4/e/subaru_HDR_3_by_exxx2005.jpg

[lucky7]

except for the part where its not an HDR. :keke:

looks pretty nice i think....

thanks.

[KA-T_240]

Holy shit that one looks gorgeous to me. MOAR POSTS PLEASE.

Here is his myspace link:
http://a548.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/18/l_ebffe50bfaba566edb3246b5277d36d3.jpg


Next time he is back in MN, I am going to drive to where ever he is, and have him take pics of my car.

http://c3.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/20/l_84911f83602502886e512ecda5b558aa.jpg

[lucky7]

dude, you could do that. i guarantee it. there is nothing spectacular he's doing.

[SimpleSexy180]

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1169/993904995_a1387e123b_o.jpg

[mrmephistopheles]

dude, you could do that. i guarantee it. there is nothing spectacular he's doing.

I'd have to say it's very UN-spectacular.



http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j104/Zilvia13/HDRSikky.jpg
http://i78.photobucket.com/albums/j104/Zilvia13/HDRMDRACER.jpg

These make me want to stab my eyes out.

[Z33dori]

lol well i told u, it's just and HDR like effect done on photoshop.

i was bored on the airplane..

the top one isnt that muched change from it's original pic

but yea the 2nd one i just went over the top...

[KA-T_240]

dude, you could do that. i guarantee it. there is nothing spectacular he's doing.

Photoshop kicks my ass!!! I am messing around with stuff. I just need to learn more. I have paint shop pro at the moment(got it fro $20).

[lucky7]

photomatix. CS3 or whatever sucks for HDR's.

[Z33dori]

yea i have CS it totally blows

[lucky7]

the merging part is ok, but tonemapping is not happening in CS.

[Z33dori]

lol i just used the shadow/highlight feature...

lol i need to DL photomatrix.... and practice some actual HDR shots...

[Pank]

its photomatix, if you search photomatrix, you wont come up with anything.

[SimpleSexy180]

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1055/1430007405_9bc0c13dca_o.jpg
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1349/543523126_5a696c6361_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3265/3126274098_34c10622c1_o.jpg

[lucky7]

those are pretty dope. i dig 'em.

[Z33dori]

i love the 1st shot... can i get wallpaper size?

pretty please

[Element_on_20s]

This is the first one I did.

http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/1179/hdrishcopygv9.jpg

I really want to get more into it.

[Matej]

http://srika.com/img/chicago_hdr/chicago_hdr_west02_1280.jpg

[Z33dori]

*drool*

i'm really starting to like this HDR.... awesome for city night shots

[Mangudai]

And the now WORLD FAMOUS
http://violentrunning.squidd.org/galleries/d/29927-3/Untitled_HDR2.jpg




If mad max drove an S13...lol that looks great man

[SimpleSexy180]

big as they get

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3124/2815876596_ca410cddfb_o.jpg

[Daniel.]

A few that I did. I like them when they're not too overdone.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v323/spidermansro/IMG_2138_39_40HDR.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v323/spidermansro/IMG_2301_2_3.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v323/spidermansro/HDR_0513_4_5.jpg

[lucky7]

i hate to say it, but i think all 3 of those are slightly out of focus. lol.

[Daniel.]

haha, they probably are.

fail.

[lucky7]

what tripod are you using. that makes a big difference.

[irax]

http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/452/fakehdrgu7.jpg


wait.... this isn't hdr is it? lol fakehdrgu7????? lol

btw is that you and you wiffeeyy in the back? thats hawt

[Daniel.]

what tripod are you using. that makes a big difference.

the $20 one from best buy haha. that probably explains everything

:(


:sadwavey:


:duh:

[pbcstylez]

here is my first attempt at HDR:

HDR - a set on Flickr (http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/sets/72157611534919834/)

[img]http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3247/3131254219_af4b76686f_b.jpg[img]

[illxs14]

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3076/2648859250_830ce897cd_b.jpg

fisher body. this place is no more. it is completely sealed off now, and heavily guarded.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2329/2174268312_b0cfe7f96e_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3164/2648030867_bdc0051107_b.jpg




i've always liked your shots :yum:

[illxs14]

^^ lucky7

lol

[SimpleSexy180]

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2147/1619212708_d163448b3f_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2369/2043808005_923a70bf1f_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3150/2680513937_5f7752602c_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3059/2890298393_64cb55f68b_o.jpg

[driftking777]

obviously photomatix was used :thumbsdown:

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d190/driftking777/Misc/KrisCHDR.jpg

http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d190/driftking777/Misc/krisHDR.jpg

[cc4usmc]

love those pics simplesexy.

[motegineon]

yea i tried it

and i basically fail at life..

def looks different from the original but i dont knonw how to ine tune the curve to really get it looking nice..btw i didnt take the pics, my brother did, i just happened to have 3 of them with slightly diff exposures so i figured id give it a try..fun stuff though i had no idea about this kinda stuff

http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b124/motegineon/HDR.jpg

[francogt1]

SImpleSexy MOOOOORE please?

[mrmephistopheles]

http://img164.imageshack.us/img164/452/fakehdrgu7.jpg


wait.... this isn't hdr is it? lol fakehdrgu7????? lol

btw is that you and you wiffeeyy in the back? thats hawt

It's fake HDR. One image with exposure adjusted via photoshop and the outputs saved to 3 files total, then those files smashed together in photomatix.

Hi Ib!

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2147/1619212708_d163448b3f_o.jpg


Beautiful shots.

Also, fuck you for:
1.) making me homesick for a place I've only lived a total of 5 years and
B.) making me facepalm for not having taken shots like that, when there were ample opportunities and locations to do so.

[licenseless]

http://photo.crowdedheadspace.com/images/20071227215605_dunes4.jpg

http://photo.crowdedheadspace.com/images/20080129065807_cars9cropped.png

http://photo.crowdedheadspace.com/images/20080129012226_cars2cropped1.png

just a few i have done

i figured i should make a contribution

[licenseless]

http://photo.crowdedheadspace.com/images/20080328182620_deadcar1fin.jpg

[Smurf_240SX]

Damn I love these pictures!

[Smurf_240SX]

http://photo.crowdedheadspace.com/images/20080129012226_cars2cropped1.png

just a few i have done

i figured i should make a contribution


Is that a mirror on the Tailgate Reflecting that beetle? or am I seeing things?

[punxva]

another one i've done more recently

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c28/punxva/photoshoot/DSC_0010_1_2.jpg

[Chrischeezer]

first one i ever tried... didn't know what i was doing...

that crane messed it up in the backround

http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k141/ChrisCheezer/Jay-HDR.jpg

[fkaB18C5MK1]

http://omitted.net/gallery/d/23300-3/IMG_2596_7_8_tonemapped.jpg

[Otto347]

love those pics simplesexy.fucking word x11tybillion

[ZX88]

anyone have a good tutorial for this?

[XeroX]

anyone have a good tutorial for this?

2nd page, post 49.....

[TheStartingLine]

here is one of my brothers Maxima
http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g229/Srpowered240/3104447467_bde5abd17e_o.jpg

[Mx_Eva]

Obviously not mine, but certainly makes me miss Okinawa =(

http://www.hdrjapan.com/images/stories/HDR%20Shuri/Shuri-Castle-Okinawa-Japan-Panorama.jpg

[ericcastro]

let me post up my favorite HDR photos!!!


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.



.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.



.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

exactly.

[lucky7]

haterade. lemme get some. :D

recents. though i dont roll with HDR much anymore. tired of it.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3364/3257790193_434909e4c8_b.jpg

mostly cause high contrast is the effing shit!

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3320/3257792715_a23aa48c4d_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3395/3258961969_be3447ff8c_b.jpg

yawn. you see, here is high contrast. high contrast = win!
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3258963501_8e9c513ff8_b.jpg

[ericcastro]

Of course high contrast is the shit, lol.

What do you think DV camera's, HD and still camera's have been trying to copy since they started being made, lol
:)


I dont mind HDR in the right context. but to just make up for a shitty picture like most people do,......wack!

[.Smitty.]

SimpleSexy, I think it's obvious that we need MOAR..

kthx :wavey: