PDA

View Full Version : U.S. military to shoot down errant spy satelite


MavericStephenc
02-16-2008, 08:11 AM
The United States military has announced their intention to use a missile to destroy USA-193, a spy satellite which failed immediately after launch in December 2006. Since launch, the satellite's orbit has decayed and it is approaching the point at which it will re-enter the atmosphere and potentially fall to Earth. The missile will be used as a kinetic anti-satellite weapon (ASAT), and will destroy the satellite through hitting it at high speed.
The satellite potentially has hazardous materials on board, including hydrazine. Ordinarily, the hydrazine would be used as fuel, but since the satellite failed immediately after launch, this was never used. It is expected that about half of the satellite would be capable of surviving re-entry, potentially including the fuel tank. Since hydrazine is toxic, the satellite could pose a severe danger if it hits in a populated area, however it has been considered likely that the tank would probably rupture and explode during re-entry. Destroying the satellite on the grounds of safety is the stated purpose of shooting down the satellite, however claims that it is to prevent secrets that the satellite is carrying from falling into the wrong hands, or that it is a demonstration in response to a Chinese ASAT test in January 2007. Officials have denied both of these claims.
The missile which will be used to shoot down the satellite will be a Standard Missile 3 (SM-3), which will be launched from a the USS Lake Erie in the North Pacific Ocean. The missile, which was designed to shoot down other missiles, will be modified slightly in order to allow it to recognize USA-193 as its target.
If the attack is successful, the satellite will be broken into many small pieces. This will eliminate the hazard from the hydrazine and break into small enough pieces that nothing will survive reentry. Officials reported that the likelihood of success was "high". NASA Administrator Michael Griffin said that it was impossible to make the situation any worse. Missing the satellite would change nothing, a while a slight blow would still result in the satellite returning to Earth, and a direct hit would destroy the satellite. It is believed that the missile will be aimed directly at the satellite's fuel tank.
While the debris will not pass near enough to the International Space Station to cause disruption, it is not clear whether it could affect spacecraft passing through the lower orbit in which USA-193 currently resides. For this reason, the satellite will not be destroyed until the Space Shuttle Atlantis, which is currently conducting mission STS-122, has landed. The debris caused by the satellite's destruction is expected to re-enter the atmosphere within a few weeks.

ThatGuy
02-16-2008, 08:20 AM
I say 15% worried about possible toxins on board.

85% Worried about Sensitive Information possibly on board.

Failed after launch or not, I doubt the government would be thrilled about the technology and information inside that satellite becoming public knowledge.

:keke:

exitspeed
02-16-2008, 08:28 AM
Hydrazine, that doesn't sound hazardous at all. :ugh:

projekt_s13
02-16-2008, 08:39 AM
It sounds like a chemical thats should be in some acne medicine. lol
Hydrazine, that doesn't sound hazardous at all. :ugh:

MavericStephenc
02-16-2008, 08:43 AM
Hydrazine (N2H4) is basicly a very unstable and toxic rocket fuel used in the space shuttle, outer atmosphere rockets and satelites.
burns up to about 800 degrees celcius.

yummy

edit: it also decomposes into ammonia. just so you guys know

mRclARK1
02-16-2008, 09:16 AM
I agree with ThatGuy. It's a combmination of the two reasons, both of which really make perfect sense. If it was my spy satellite, I'd shoot it down too.

Not to mention shooting things down is so much fun. :keke:

Dirty Habit
02-16-2008, 09:27 AM
This is going to be oh so rad!

allntrlundrgrnd
02-16-2008, 09:34 AM
hmm sensitive information? and a chance to nut flex? bombs away :rl:

cgtdream
02-16-2008, 10:28 AM
Hydrazine (N2H4) is basicly a very unstable and toxic rocket fuel used in the space shuttle, outer atmosphere rockets and satelites.
burns up to about 800 degrees celcius.

yummy

edit: it also decomposes into ammonia. just so you guys know

Also used on some fighter jets....lol, silly goverment....when they first realized that the sattelite was gonna crash, newspapers across america printed how dangerous it could be...of course the military downplayed it afterwards....and now.....its a danger again....aside from the info that could be onboard, they prolly realozed where it might crash, and threw up the oh no flag/....

S14DB
02-16-2008, 10:55 AM
$10 million dollar fireworks show woot.

jackjack
02-16-2008, 11:23 AM
^pretty much. i saw this on the news a couple of days ago.

fliprayzin240sx
02-16-2008, 11:30 AM
Why dont we just let it crash and hope it lands somewhere on oh i dont know...Hugo Chavez' house??? I cant stand half the shiet that comes out of that mans mouth. Like the whole US is out to get him and shiet...Dood...STFU. If we didnt need or buy your oil, you wont have shit!!!

ryguy
02-16-2008, 11:35 AM
Why dont we just let it crash and hope it lands somewhere on oh i dont know...Hugo Chavez' house??? I cant stand half the shiet that comes out of that mans mouth. Like the whole US is out to get him and shiet...Dood...STFU. If we didnt need or buy your oil, you wont have shit!!!

Maybe we should fire the missile, and have it "accidentally malfunction" and head right for Chavez's house. Our bad.

firelizard
02-16-2008, 12:06 PM
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s271/bokeatong/piccolo/DBZ_GokuPiccoloVSRaditz__FullFig-6.jpg

This guy

Yes it's relevant.

Sean14
02-16-2008, 12:19 PM
$10 million dollar fireworks show woot.


So in theory, if you were in the right part of the world, at night, could you see this actually explode?

In my mind its a lot more dramatic than I'm sure it really will be...

PF ALL DAY
02-16-2008, 03:51 PM
so when do we get to see something blow up?

Matej
02-16-2008, 04:41 PM
Cuba will capture it first.

bardabe
02-16-2008, 05:46 PM
http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s271/bokeatong/piccolo/DBZ_GokuPiccoloVSRaditz__FullFig-6.jpg

This guy

Yes it's relevant.

http://rpgmario.free.fr/images/fire_mario_choix.jpg owns

s13Dr1ft
02-16-2008, 08:08 PM
Maybe we should fire the missile, and have it "accidentally malfunction" and head right for Chavez's house. Our bad.

No, it will "accidently" hit Iran.

BustedS13
02-16-2008, 08:12 PM
don't shoot it down, this bro needs a new hand

http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/7519/tetsuo7sv.jpg

fliprayzin240sx
02-16-2008, 08:21 PM
Hmm...funny part is how come they still havent calculated where it might land...

98s14inaz
02-19-2008, 11:27 AM
I say 15% worried about possible toxins on board.

85% Worried about Sensitive Information possibly on board.

Failed after launch or not, I doubt the government would be thrilled about the technology and information inside that satellite becoming public knowledge.

:keke:

It must be pretty sensitive material for the military to not trust NASA to capture the satellite and repair it. For Christ sake they went up to fix the hubble which imo is more complicated than fixing a spy satellite. I agree about the sensitivity of what's on board.