View Full Version : ka rebuild vs sr20 which is cheaper?
raysweiwei
02-14-2008, 11:48 PM
if i am only looking to about 300-350whp, which engine is cheaper to go with? how much do you need to spend on a ka rebuild? if rebuild ka t has good power + 2400 c.c and less money for SR20 i think i will go for it thanks.
Farzam
02-14-2008, 11:51 PM
I'd rather do SR20
But KA would probably be cheaper.
revat619
02-14-2008, 11:59 PM
its gonna be about the same.
if your goal is 300-350 rwhp...oh and RELIABLY mind you....being "cheap" really shouldn't be in your vocabulary.
Please do more research on KA-T's and SR's before doing either. This has been discussed countless times before.
iHeart240
02-15-2008, 12:06 AM
ka-t
get it.
cheaper.
realiable....
if done correctly
sr is good too.. hmm shit
GO SR!
raysweiwei
02-15-2008, 12:14 AM
alright thanks SR all the way
98koukile
02-15-2008, 12:16 AM
Well in Cali your in a lose/lose, at least with a ka-t you can make it stock pretty quick for a ref check
fairladysx_s13
02-15-2008, 01:10 AM
id say go with a ka. Theyre ganna be about the same price. Id go with ka because the parts are easier to find because u can find them in a junkyard and can get anything within a few days. Also ka's are torque monsters haha. And i drive an sr20. i kno i kno im very contradicting
eastcoastS14
02-15-2008, 01:26 AM
SR 350whp
s14 sr
walbro 255 lph fp
740cc inj
t3/to4e 57trim .63 a/r
fmic
koyo rad
sard fpr
enthalpy ROM tune ECU
done and done
thats stock internals too btw
MrChow
02-15-2008, 01:28 AM
its gonna be about the same.
if your goal is 300-350 rwhp...oh and RELIABLY mind you....being "cheap" really shouldn't be in your vocabulary.
Please do more research on KA-T's and SR's before doing either. This has been discussed countless times before.
As he said. Research before you ask.
Phlip
02-15-2008, 04:28 AM
Wow, is it 2001 all over again?
IF YOU HAD SEARCHED, you would have noticed that threads like this always become pissing contests.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.