View Full Version : project S13K
RJayS.
12-10-2007, 05:00 PM
I'm sorry if this is a repost I search and came up with nothing.
I don't know how many of your read import tuner but while I was looking through the latest issue I came across project S13k. Basically they put a honda S2000 engine into a S13 chassis. Boost is set a 17 PSI and 357whp. IMO I find it kinda intresting. Something different. I tried looking for the article but couldn't find it sorry.
Found it kinda intresting thought I would see what you guys think.
RJayS.
Matej
12-10-2007, 05:53 PM
Did they do it because the owner wanted to swap the superior Nissan motor into his S2K? :bigok:
ThatGuy
12-10-2007, 05:54 PM
Nah, the 240 owner hated torque. :keke:
cc4usmc
12-10-2007, 05:56 PM
I like to be different, but I thought that swap was retarded.
KA24DESOneThree
12-10-2007, 06:04 PM
It'd be decent if the F20C was NA, considering how light it is.
LongGrain
12-10-2007, 06:11 PM
i dont want to sound rude or anything, but you guys really hate on anything made by honda dont you, even when a stock F20c (naturally aspirated) makes as much power as an SR20det....their kick-ass motors. along with many others made by honda....
Bobafreak
12-10-2007, 06:13 PM
i dd a Honda civic 4 door. Good on gas. plus less attention.
Matej
12-10-2007, 06:15 PM
i dont want to sound rude or anything, but you guys really hate on anything made by honda dont you...
Nah, just S2K's, even Hitler hated them.
Kn1ves
12-10-2007, 06:18 PM
i love honda and their motors... but putting an F20 on a car with an already capable engine replacement/engine is pretty dumb considering it would require a lot more prep to turbo it.
lets put it this way, its like putting a LS1 into a Mustang. Sure you can do it, but why? The Mustangs V8 is already capable..
ALTRNTV
12-10-2007, 06:19 PM
i dont want to sound rude or anything, but you guys really hate on anything made by honda dont you, even when a stock F20c (naturally aspirated) makes as much power as an SR20det....their kick-ass motors. along with many others made by honda....
It's not that it's made by Honda, it's because you're replacing the KA with a torqueless wonder. The F20C is an amazing motor, but I wouldn't want my powerband to start at 8k rpms. :)
Full-Lock
12-10-2007, 06:19 PM
ahh yes yes i saw this car
it was an s13 vert w/ silvia front and an almost identical Sears paint/vinyl setup as chris forsbergs 350z.
when i first saw the cover i did a double take at the motor.
and then i thought that chris forsberg was going to an s13. but nope
i thought it was pretty cool
fromxtor
12-10-2007, 06:19 PM
Ok so it makes more HP, but you suffer in the tq dept. So it's give and take.
cdlong
12-10-2007, 06:31 PM
even when a stock F20c (naturally aspirated) makes as much power as an SR20det....
put a 240bhp F20c powered s13 up against a 240bhp sr or ka-t powered s13 and see which one wins. area under the curve is as important as peak (if not more).
they're kick-ass motors. along with many others made by honda....
that's definitely true. just don't say anything about specific output, stupidest argument ever.
pignose4life
12-10-2007, 09:18 PM
Nah, the 240 owner hated torque. :keke:
read my mind hah
k's_silvia2.0
12-10-2007, 09:22 PM
Ben Schwarts is gay.
muddafakka
12-10-2007, 09:50 PM
Ben's vert made it into the latest issue of Super Street. Go buy it.
Don't make me moderate this thread!! hahaha! :keke:
Seriously, my S2K is faster in its stock form than my modded SR'd 240sx was.
I'd take a naturally aspirated engine anytime over a turbo. Response is so much better...
k's_silvia2.0
12-10-2007, 10:07 PM
Ben's vert made it into the latest issue of Super Street. Go buy it.
No dont!!!!!
Don't make me moderate this thread!! hahaha! :keke:
Seriously, my S2K is faster in its stock form than my modded SR'd 240sx was.
I'd take a naturally aspirated engine anytime over a turbo. Response is so much better...
All that lag can be taken care of nowadays with some proper tunning;)
FYI I spank stock s2k's on the freeway:D
Dont pink me.:keke:
canyonking
12-10-2007, 10:08 PM
I saw the article, I thought it was a waste of a perfectly good S13
k's_silvia2.0
12-10-2007, 10:12 PM
I saw the article, I thought it was a waste of a perfectly good S13
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!
muddafakka
12-10-2007, 10:37 PM
It's a unique swap yeah, but for a vert? Nah.
No dont!!!!!
All that lag can be taken care of nowadays with some proper tunning;)
FYI I spank stock s2k's on the freeway:D
Dont pink me.:keke:
Trust me, on a track, you will always feel lag. Always.
And when I meant faster, I meant on a track, not on illegal highway or street races... :keke:
Dirty Habit
12-11-2007, 08:13 AM
Anyone else stop reading super street when they were 14? I flip through the pages occasionally while at walmart...
Anyone else stop reading super street when they were 14? I flip through the pages occasionally while at walmart...
I never read it to begin with... ;)
Okinawandrifter87
12-11-2007, 08:25 AM
Anyone else stop reading super street when they were 14? I flip through the pages occasionally while at walmart...
Haha thats the only time I read em lol..
muddafakka
12-11-2007, 08:26 AM
Anyone else stop reading super street when they were 14? I flip through the pages occasionally while at walmart...
I never read it fully...so many goddamn ads. Just check out what I like and that's it.
SHIFT_*grind*
12-11-2007, 08:30 AM
The magazines all suck now. I used to like SCC, now they change editors like every 3 months and it's only about 50 pages thick.
And I can never find GRM. :(
ayuaddict
12-11-2007, 10:25 AM
ive been a subscriber to SCC for about 5 years.
apparently they stopped sending me issues about 4 months ago.
didn't notice until last week that they stopped coming in.
past couple years they went to shit anyways, reading nothing is better than reading shit i suppose.
steve shadows
12-11-2007, 10:26 AM
I'm sorry if this is a repost I search and came up with nothing.
I don't know how many of your read import tuner but while I was looking through the latest issue I came across project S13k. Basically they put a honda S2000 engine into a S13 chassis. Boost is set a 17 PSI and 357whp. IMO I find it kinda intresting. Something different. I tried looking for the article but couldn't find it sorry.
Found it kinda intresting thought I would see what you guys think.
RJayS.
I find it retarded
just do whatever turns you on.
KA24DESOneThree
12-11-2007, 04:03 PM
I find it retarded
That's because you, for some unknown reason, actually like the SR20DET.
NA F20C could make 300hp easily, while weighing 100 pounds less than an SR with a front mount.
I bought the magazine.
I don't know why.
I was reading an article, and every paragraph had at least two references to "hyphy."
As a result, I'm never buying another issue.
Peter_North
12-11-2007, 04:18 PM
NA F20C could make 300hp easily
....................rofl
KA24DESOneThree
12-11-2007, 05:10 PM
....................rofl
In a 2250lb car, 300hp is nothing to laugh at.
yarou
12-11-2007, 05:14 PM
That's because you, for some unknown reason, actually like the SR20DET.
NA F20C could make 300hp easily, while weighing 100 pounds less than an SR with a front mount.
NA 300hp is by no means "easy" for the f20c
cdlong
12-11-2007, 06:19 PM
I was reading an article, and every paragraph had at least two references to "hyphy."
this "hyphy"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphy
why?
nightshiftgarage
12-11-2007, 06:39 PM
300 hp in a honda means like 198 lbs. of tourqe. lol what turds , i hate hondas. f20c is a good replacement for like a 4age which , if im not mistaken , is also lacking in the tourqe dept. not a sr or ka
yarou
12-11-2007, 07:27 PM
NA 300hp f20c also costs way too fucking much and is totally not worth it when you can get similar power in an sr or ka for much much much less.
300 hp in a honda means like 198 lbs. of tourqe. lol what turds , i hate hondas. f20c is a good replacement for like a 4age which , if im not mistaken , is also lacking in the tourqe dept. not a sr or ka
Still is faster... People like you don't get that most VTEC engine have a totally flat torque curve. So 154lbs of torque is 150+ lbs from 1000 to 9000 rpm.
Who cares about peak torque...? On a road course (track), when you stay in your powerband, low end torque is totally irrelevant.
Oh yeah, and 300hp n/a on a F20C is nearly impossible unless you dish out tons of money. The engine is almost maxed out from factory.
yarou
12-11-2007, 07:37 PM
Still is faster... People like you don't get that most VTEC engine have a totally flat torque curve. So 154lbs of torque is 150+ lbs from 1000 to 9000 rpm.
Who cares about peak torque...? On a road course (track), when you stay in your powerband, low end torque is totally irrelevant.
Oh yeah, and 300hp n/a on a F20C is nearly impossible unless you dish out tons of money. The engine is almost maxed out from factory.
Nothing but love here, I own an 02'. I just don't think its worth the cost for the swap
That I agree.. Added to the fast that it was turboed... But who cares, I just hate the "torque" bashing... The F20C is of the best 4cyl in the world... (N/A that is)
nightshiftgarage
12-11-2007, 08:08 PM
for the record , ive owned a 99 gsr integra. i hated it and wasnt very impressed after i was told how great they are by the honda kids. v tech smeetech
yarou
12-11-2007, 08:10 PM
for the record , ive owned a 99 gsr integra. i hated it and wasnt very impressed after i was told how great they are by the honda kids. v tech smeetech
different strokes
all this talk and no link yet? meh
i remember about a year ago i saw an f20 swapped into a beat up white coupe on ebay. kinda cool in a way. too much work imo tho.
For the record, I owned a SR'd 240sx... and it was slower at 7 psi on the track, on a drag strip, at everything. And it did horrible gas mileage too... :keke:
Peter_North
12-11-2007, 10:32 PM
In a 2250lb car, 300hp is nothing to laugh at.
I know that, I was laughing at the fact that you think 300whp is easy to get out of an NA f20, turbo s2ks have dynoed under that.
For the record, I owned a SR'd 240sx... and it was slower at 7 psi on the track, on a drag strip, at everything. And it did horrible gas mileage too... :keke: Yay lets compare a shitty stock redtop swapped into a 240 to a $30,000 sports car.
300 hp in a honda means like 198 lbs. of tourqe. lol what turds , i hate hondas. f20c is a good replacement for like a 4age which , if im not mistaken , is also lacking in the tourqe dept. not a sr or ka I agree, hondas are retared. The only imports I like are Nissans and subarus....the rest are pointless.
SHIFT_*grind*
12-12-2007, 06:41 AM
NA 300hp is by no means "easy" for the f20c
For real. Try getting 300 horses, N/A, out of *ANY* 2.0L engine (or 2.2L for that matter, if you want to try it with an AP2). There's not a damn thing that's "easy" about that, and it certainly wouldn't be cheap.
For what it's worth, my friend used to have an S2K and he took me for a ride in it a few times. I never drove it, but I didn't have to; I had more fun riding shotgun than I ever have in any other car. Who cares if you have to rev it to make power, and if it's actually not quite as fast as X car with Y mods? With the top down and the thing screaming up to 9K on every shift, it sure as hell feels like you hit 100 pretty quick :)
Such fun cars; if I can afford it in the next couple of years, it'll probably be my next purchase, whether it's slower than my S13 or not =P
fromxtor
12-12-2007, 07:04 AM
I stopped reading super street due to their constant KA bashing. Seems the writing staff there is way too JDM to ever think about turboing a KA. :down:
ThatGuy
12-12-2007, 08:31 AM
That is because they invented "JDM". It was their word to start with, so they are gonna ride the hell out of it.
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 08:55 AM
That is because they invented "JDM". It was their word to start with, so they are gonna ride the hell out of it.
Yup, same with "time attack"
Yay lets compare a shitty stock redtop swapped into a 240 to a $30,000 sports car.
BTW, that was my "shitty stock redtop swapped" 240sx: http://www.zilvia.net/f/vbpicgallery.php?do=view&g=8
nightshiftgarage
12-12-2007, 10:10 AM
ok im over it
PRADOgy
12-12-2007, 10:30 AM
Trust me, on a track, you will always feel lag. Always.
And when I meant faster, I meant on a track, not on illegal highway or street races...
here you go friend,
http://www.zilvia.net/f/showthread.php?p=1638206#post1638206
:keke:
PRADOgy
12-12-2007, 10:41 AM
f20c NA in a 240... pretty cool i guess.. faster than a ka and funner than a KA.. but dropping it in to boost it.. yeah stoopid!.. dont need to explain myself why.. it just is.
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 10:54 AM
BTW, that was my "shitty stock redtop swapped" 240sx: http://www.zilvia.net/f/vbpicgallery.php?do=view&g=8
Looks good, but what I meant was an old ass redtop on 7 psi is by no means fast.
here you go friend,
http://www.zilvia.net/f/showthread.php?p=1638206#post1638206
:keke:
Most of the S2000 were faster... but the comparisom is bogus, it's not the same driver in the cars... ;) :keke:
Looks good, but what I meant was an old ass redtop on 7 psi is by no means fast.
But it has way more torque than a F20C... ;)
And power was similar to F20C. I mean, 240hp on that redtop with all these boltons should match up no?
Anyways, I am just playing devil's advocate for all you Honda bashers... People need to understand that making power N/A = revving it up. And N/A, Torque is limited to whatever displacement can offer.
Let's not start talking about SR20 (N/A) torque. that is scary, even for the SR20VE. ;)
VROOOM
12-12-2007, 11:12 AM
ive owned a 194 whp b18c powered hatch and a sr powered 240sx. civic was faster in a straight line by far, but it wasnt as fun to drive. having all that torque helps alot and makes things more interesting. but dont bash honda's they are the reason good parts are available for our cars.
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 11:19 AM
ive owned a 194 whp b18c powered hatch and a sr powered 240sx. civic was faster in a straight line by far, but it wasnt as fun to drive. having all that torque helps alot and makes things more interesting. but dont bash honda's they are the reason good parts are available for our cars.
A stock SR usually dynos at 180whp.
Catback + FMIC + MBC + tuning = bye bye civic
VROOOM
12-12-2007, 11:21 AM
A stock SR usually dynos at 180whp.
Catback + FMIC + MBC + tuning = bye bye civic
my sr had 3 in full exhaust front mount an intake and it ran 14.0. the motor in my civic ran 12.7 in a 4 door integra. hmm wonder what would win
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 11:23 AM
my sr had 3 in full exhaust front mount an intake and it ran 14.0. the motor in my civic ran 12.7 in a 4 door integra. hmm wonder what would win
Got any proof? Theres people on here with low 12 second timeslips that are still running stop turbo SR's
You're just a honda fanboy. FWD sucks, and no matter how you look at it 240's are better drag platforms than anything FWD, especially honduhs.
VROOOM
12-12-2007, 11:25 AM
i had a sr powered 240sx in 1999 yeah im honda fan boy
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 11:30 AM
i had a sr powered 240sx in 1999 yeah im honda fan boy
You obviously are, talking about an imagenary 4 door 12 second integra. You honda people always bothered the crap out of me when I owned a T28 KA. Always wanting to race me, I risk getting a ticket and my license revoked hoping to get a good race but none could even come close to keeping up, even a " built " boosted GSR hatch. Seems like every honda kid wants a piece of the 240sx, envy much?
SHIFT_*grind*
12-12-2007, 11:33 AM
Theres people on here with low 12 second timeslips that are still running stop turbo SR's
Got any proof?
Can we stop the bench racing and ignorant blanket statements, please?
VROOOM
12-12-2007, 11:37 AM
You obviously are, talking about an imagenary 4 door 12 second integra. You honda people always bothered the crap out of me when I owned a T28 KA. Always wanting to race me, I risk getting a ticket and my license revoked hoping to get a good race but none could even come close to keeping up, even a " built " boosted GSR hatch. Seems like every honda kid wants a piece of the 240sx, envy much?
i respect all fast cars, unlike you. i know that hondas can be fast, you seem to deny that
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 11:40 AM
i respect all fast cars, unlike you. i know that hondas can be fast, you seem to deny that
I know they can be fast, its still easier to make a 240 faster and at the end of the day it isnt an annoying ugly little hatchback. 240s are at least RWD and look nice.
SHIFT_*grind*
12-12-2007, 11:43 AM
Uhh...
S2000s are A) not ugly, B) not hatchbacks (which most S13s are, by the way), and C) not FWD.
......
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 11:47 AM
Uhh...
S2000s are A) not ugly, B) not hatchbacks (which most S13s are, by the way), and C) not FWD.
......
I'm taling about civics which I find ugly, and the S2000 I dont find very good looking either. Oh btw, the 240s are actually FASTBACKS, which arent the same as hatchbacks. You wouldnt call a 350z a hatchback would you? No...
ManoNegra
12-12-2007, 11:49 AM
for the record , ive owned a 99 gsr integra. i hated it and wasnt very impressed after i was told how great they are by the honda kids. v tech smeetech
Knew a guy with one years ago with just a few suspension mods. De-baged it would make an ideal daily driver imo.
For the record, I owned a SR'd 240sx... and it was slower at 7 psi on the track, on a drag strip, at everything. And it did horrible gas mileage too... :keke:
I thought S2000s and 240s had similar gas mileage, ~25mpg or so, no? Anyways, I would love an S2000 but two seater and high insurance just doesn't make it very practical to me.
I stopped reading super street due to their constant KA bashing. Seems the writing staff there is way too JDM to ever think about turboing a KA. :down:
Whatever sells the mags...
Don't get the Honda bashing going on, they're reliable capable cars. I'd rock an EG6 or EK9 as a daily. It's the fanboys, Honda and Nissan alike that kill it either way.
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 11:52 AM
Don't get the Honda bashing going on, they're reliable capable cars. I'd rock an EG6 or EK9 as a daily. It's the fanboys, Honda and Nissan alike that kill it either way.
Yea for a daily...anything other than that is just pointless with a honda.
SHIFT_*grind*
12-12-2007, 11:53 AM
which arent the same as hatchbacks.
Oh God. Explain to me the difference, then, in painstaking detail.
Hatchback, fastback, liftback, whatever the hell you want to call it. It's a big-ass piece of glass that lifts up to reveal a trunk, or trunk-like compartment.
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 11:57 AM
Oh God. Explain to me the difference, then, in painstaking detail.
Hatchback, fastback, liftback, whatever the hell you want to call it. It's a big-ass piece of glass that lifts up to reveal a trunk, or trunk-like compartment.
Its still not a hatchback, not a coupe either obviously, but not a hatch. Does a 240sx look anything like a crx? How about a mid 90s civic? No it does not.
SHIFT_*grind*
12-12-2007, 12:02 PM
Then why does everybody who owns one call it a hatch. Dude.
Never mind.
PRADOgy
12-12-2007, 12:02 PM
ok.. if you guys are talking about drag racing this little argument will never end... all in all ZERO-YON blows any who..
f20c engine is really fun.. but in order to make big power in that engine you need a big bank account..
that engine NA is real fun.. i dont see a point in boosting it.. if thats the case your SR or RB or hell even 1J options are far beyond that F20/22c ..in a financial or HP point of view
markyboi
12-12-2007, 12:04 PM
i would love to have a stock bodied (ek, dc integra or a si coupe) with a k20 swap as a dd.
markyboi
12-12-2007, 12:05 PM
well, his "dictionary/encyclopedia" describes hatchback as a civic..
so if it's a r32 golf, he wouldnt call it a hatchback because its not a civic
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 12:08 PM
well, his "dictionary/encyclopedia" describes hatchback as a civic..
so if it's a r32 golf, he wouldnt call it a hatchback because its not a civic
The 240sx does not look anything like an R32 golf. Those are traditional "hot hatches "
Do you people know anything about cars or what? Am I the only one here that knows other things about cars than " drift, skyline, Volk, SR20det, JDM,body kit " ?
SHIFT_*grind*
12-12-2007, 12:11 PM
OK. Since you know so much about cars, I'll ask you one more time.
Explain to me the definition of a hatchback.
THEN, explain to me the definition of a fastback.
DEFINITION. Which means "a civic is a hatch, a 240 is not" DOESN'T COUNT.
markyboi
12-12-2007, 12:11 PM
read and learn:
http://www.reference.com/search?q=hatchback
Peter_North
12-12-2007, 12:19 PM
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc209/TSalz/civic.jpg
http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc209/TSalz/240sxxxx.jpg
A quick google search. Notice, 1 looks like an ugly bubble, the other looks like a sports car.
markyboi
12-12-2007, 12:21 PM
^^^yeahp, his definition of hatchback is a civic...its like talking to a wall
SHIFT_*grind*
12-12-2007, 12:28 PM
A quick google search. Notice, 1 looks like an ugly bubble, the other looks like a sports car.
Again, definition is based on what you think it looks like. Give me a definition, IN WORDS. Because, you know, that's what definitions are written in.
By the way, the first 10 pages of a Google image search of "fastback" are composed entirely of 1st generation Mustangs. No 240s to be found.
MY GOD I'M GETTING DUMBER WITH EVERY POST
codyace
12-12-2007, 01:53 PM
i love honda and their motors... but putting an F20 on a car with an already capable engine replacement/engine is pretty dumb considering it would require a lot more prep to turbo it.
I wouldn't be calling a KA capable of that HP for , because to make it reliable is going to cost a chunk of change too. Please, no need for the 1-5 guys with 400 whp on their cars, as I'll post 50 who have blown up at 250hp.
lets put it this way, its like putting a LS1 into a Mustang. Sure you can do it, but why? The Mustangs V8 is already capable..
I'll keep the comment in regard to Fox bodies, because a stock LS1 will run the balls off of anything this side of a stroked 347. An ls1 fox with a decent driver is an easy 11 second car. I think there are guys with suspension and slicks running high 10's with them too.
That's because you, for some unknown reason, actually like the SR20DET.
Who doesn't like SR's?
NA F20C could make 300hp easily, while weighing 100 pounds less than an SR with a front mount.
300 hp easy in a s2k? Maybe with a 100 shot.
Who cares about peak torque...? On a road course (track), when you stay in your powerband, low end torque is totally irrelevant.
QFT. When you're above 4/5k all the time, torque doesn't gain or make much of a difference (realitivly speaking of course).
A stock SR usually dynos at 180whp.
Catback + FMIC + MBC + tuning = bye bye civic
Maybe versus a stock GSR or a D series
Not if the Little civic has a worked B18 or even better a worked k20, or a k20/k24.
here you go friend,
:keke:
I assume you don't go to track days much...
I think it's a neat swap, perfect for magazine exposure!
RJayS.
12-12-2007, 08:44 PM
i have a 2001 civic ex and have nothing against honda.
but of course my SR'd 240 is funner to drive but i like RWD better and the civic has a slow D series engine great on gas. there is only one car company i dislike but i wont bring that up.
KA24DESOneThree
12-12-2007, 10:23 PM
Who said whp?
Who said stock displacement?
I used to build Porsche engines, so easy is a relative term.
Besides, we stray from my point.
Lighter-than-stock engine plus lighter-than-stock car means better weight distribution and insane response.
DALAZ_68
12-13-2007, 01:04 AM
Nah, the 240 owner hated torque. :keke:
:keke::keke::keke::keke: nice one lol
racepar1
12-15-2007, 09:30 PM
WOW all of you missed the whole point of the swap! The point was to gain reliability. The sr20's valvetrain sucks, period. Whatever nissan engineer decided to put rocker arms on a DOHC high-revving turbo engine should be HANGED BY THE BALLS! They had multiple valvetrain failures on his previous car so they decided to try something different. I personally don't like the swap, but at least it had a point.
if the point was reliability, why isn't he swapping a mercedes diesel into it?
racepar1
12-15-2007, 11:44 PM
if the point was reliability, why isn't he swapping a mercedes diesel into it?
Your sarcasm is staggering. LOL Seriously though they covered the swap and interviewed them in (ugh!) import tuner. According to the interview the primary reason was reliability. God I feel like such a ricer for mentioning import tuner!
drift freaq
12-16-2007, 12:07 AM
Again, definition is based on what you think it looks like. Give me a definition, IN WORDS. Because, you know, that's what definitions are written in.
By the way, the first 10 pages of a Google image search of "fastback" are composed entirely of 1st generation Mustangs. No 240s to be found.
MY GOD I'M GETTING DUMBER WITH EVERY POST
Well if you look up the 180sx and the 240sx Fastback in all Nissan info you will discover that yes S13 Fastbacks are fastbacks as designated by the parent company. Now you can be uninformed and call it a hatch like most ex honda people do as well as less educated people do. Though in true sense of the term its a Fastback as is a 240z regardless of it having a deck lid(that Honda and lazy people call hatchs).
Hell even I have called it a hatch inadvertently because so many people say it and I hear them saying it so often. It does not make it true or right. Its a fastback.
P.s. this is not a flame of you its a statement of facts. Now quite arguing over it and get back on topic.
SHARKERIOcoupe
01-28-2009, 09:54 AM
craaaazy...has any one seen or found a link to this thing?
post it man
BustedS13
01-28-2009, 10:09 AM
The magazines all suck now. I used to like SCC, now they change editors like every 3 months and it's only about 50 pages thick.
And I can never find GRM. :(
scc is going out of print like this month
SimpleS14
01-28-2009, 10:12 AM
craaaazy...has any one seen or found a link to this thing?
post it man
You bump an old thread for this? :ughd:
SHIFT_*grind*
01-28-2009, 03:35 PM
scc is going out of print like this month
I posted that in another thread. Wires get crossed somewhere? ;)
shishcabobers
01-28-2009, 04:28 PM
scc is going out of print like this month
Yeah got a notification that SCC last issue and the continuation of my subscription will go to modified....talk about fail.
CrimsonRockett
01-28-2009, 04:37 PM
Bumping old threads...
You nasty.
:lockd:
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.