View Full Version : 91 92 s13 and 93 s13
HKrpS13
01-31-2002, 01:34 PM
some one told me that the 91, 92 has power seat belt and the 93 is manual. Is this true? is there anything else thats different?
BlankFlip
01-31-2002, 01:39 PM
they're all made in different years. some may refer to the 91 s13 as being made in the year 1991.
93 comes in manual or auto though. 94 is solely auto convertibles. n 91 has the best cams made ever for 240's. that's all i know off the top of my head since i have an s14.
sykikchimp
01-31-2002, 09:19 PM
BLankflip - We will soon see about those cams. I have S13Grl checking on this tomorrow I assume. She said she would check it out and post what she finds.
Also, I think what he meant was the 93' had manual Seat belts.
There were NO manual seatbelts sold in the US. The only way you would have one is if it came from Canada.
The only difference b/w the cars is supposedly the Cam Duration. There is a myth (we'll soon find out if I'm right) about the 91 cams being hotter than the 92' or 93'.
mbmbmb23
01-31-2002, 09:54 PM
My 93 base hatch has automatic seatbelts.
M
White240sx
01-31-2002, 10:21 PM
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Quote: from BlankFlip on 1:39 pm on Jan. 31, 2002
91 has the best cams made ever for 240's. that's all i know off the top of my head since i have an s14.
</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
The '91 also has the best fatcory performance figures of any 240sx.
240meowth
01-31-2002, 10:43 PM
as i purchased my 93 coupe base edition, it came w/ auto seatbelt, power window, and cruse control, excellent =)
the 91 runs 0-60 in 7.9
the 93 runs 0-60 in 8.3
oh well, .4 sec, that's the reason i've been loosing to civics
sykikchimp
02-01-2002, 12:51 AM
I think the marketing guys got a little happy in 91.. How can they justify .4 seconds??? A cam should NOT give you almost half a second to sixty.. that would be like 3/4 of a second i the 1/4 mile.. which all of us know is A LOT. If there was that much difference they shoudn't have been rated the same HP/Torque figures. The 91 should be better?
MorganS13
02-01-2002, 06:23 AM
"oh well, .4 sec, that's the reason i've been loosing to civics "
...u lose to civics?? :o <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':)'>
drift freaq
02-01-2002, 11:44 AM
hahahahahahaha,
he's just jealous of all of us who own 91's hahahahahaha J/K
uuninja
02-01-2002, 03:26 PM
I have seen :eek: with my own eyes a 91 with an lsd run a 15.2 Bone Stock. No BS, I chatted with the driver before the run and checked out his car. I actually offered to buy it on the spot.
240meowth
02-01-2002, 03:32 PM
i lost to 3 civics, on time this one just pulled up next to me and guned it, i wasn't able to catch up, then the next time was the same thing, i was albe to catch up little by little, milimeter by milimeter, but then i gave up, then the next one was head to head, stopped @ the light, but i couldn't gain traction, neither could he, but his FWD got advantage over me, i was fish tailing... oh shucks, so i slowed down...
drift freaq
02-01-2002, 09:01 PM
meowth ,
when your drag racing you need to learn to feather your gas pedal so that your wheels grip without breaking loose to much i.e. romp on it when you dump your clutch but then back off a little on the gas and feather it lightly that way your wheels hook up and you go you don't sit and spin.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.