View Full Version : lightweight flywheel power
Goinsleeper
05-20-2006, 12:40 AM
i couldnt find any threads with what i was looking for. i was wondering the basic power differences from stock flywheel to lightened? i know for NA cars, a lightened flywheel is great, but on a turbo app car, why would you want to get through your rpm's as quickly? wouldnt it also interfere with turbo spool? just curious to hear from some of you who lightened the flywheel and whether or not you were happy about the difference and what they were.
ps: also, what is the weight of the stock flywheel?
nismonster
05-20-2006, 02:44 AM
On the contrary, the lighter the flywheel, the faster the engine spins (because of less inertia) and thus you have better spooling and throttle response. There is however the simple fact that you will lose revs faster as well, particularly when you shift (which is the major issue) and you will have to shift faster to make up for this, especially with a turbo car, to keep the turbo spooling. But you can definitely increase acceleration that way. As for not wanting to go through the rpms faster: the rpm is connected to the speed that you are traveling, when you are in gear. Which means the faster you can go through the rev range the faster you can accelerate. This means lightening any the parts that are spinning (pistons, connecting rods, flywheel, driveshaft, crankshaft, brake rotors and, wheels and tires) will make you accelerate faster.
I hope that helps.
nismonster
05-20-2006, 02:53 AM
Also, I should warn you. Since, the flywheel weighs less, you will need more revs to get the car going without stalling as well, which can lead to nasty burning clutch smell if you don't adapt quickly, and could be embarassing if you don't remember and stall at a light. Really light flywheels (around 50% percent lighter than stock) are probably no good for the street. Those that are slightly (maybe 30%) lighter than stock and that have replaceable friction rings can be alot friendlier. That way with a turbo car you can accelerate faster but not fall out of spooling rpms when you lift off the throttle, or much more importantly, between shifts which could potentially be a problem. Plus, the car won't be as tricky to launch and would be better suited for street use (in my opinion)
What does anyone else think?
Goinsleeper
05-20-2006, 03:15 AM
well how much does the stock flywheel weigh? when i search on here i dont get much about it, and if i google it, it just bring up a bunch of sites trying to sell flywheels lol. i was curious about the jgy flywheel but they dont use the friction rings i dont think.
PS: the jgy weighs 10.5 lbs
DJPimpFlex
05-20-2006, 03:50 AM
stock is 18 I believe.....
wootwoot
05-20-2006, 11:37 AM
Technically your turbo will spool slightly slower with a lighter flywheel because of less load on the engine. But I'm talking 50rpms
aznxplayer
05-20-2006, 01:09 PM
Technically your turbo will spool slightly slower with a lighter flywheel because of less load on the engine. But I'm talking 50rpms
how would the load of the engine affect the turbo spooling? its the exhaust gasses, not the turn of the engine that spools the turbo. correct me if im wrong please.
Goinsleeper
05-20-2006, 01:09 PM
a 10.5 lb flywheel with lightened pulleys and no ac or ps wouldnt stall at a light would it? i know a lil about hondas and stalling but not so much about our engine. had a friend with a 7.5 lb on his eg hatch, if the ac was on and he took it out of gear it was over lol.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.